Done reading. I just had to skim some of that thesis. You'd think a retired person has all the time in the world but he really doesn't. Always something else that I need to do besides trying to write a novel.
Hillary is still pretty much a 60s young person between the ears as I once was once upon a time a long time ago.
No wonder her political ambitions want to bury that thesis and other 60's stuff under stealth make-up Bernie's out in the open socialism does not use.
She's a phony as well as a consistent liar.
What really jumped up at me of what I did read of the thesis was Hillary writing "Alinsky reminds critics that the difference between a "liberal" and a "radical" is that the liberal refuses to fight for the goals he professes."
Yeah, I'll buy that in a relative kinda way.
"What!?!" is what jumped out of me after I read under PRIMARY SOURCES the following: "His (Alinsky's) offer of a place in the new Institute was tempting but after spending a year trying to make sense out of his inconsistency, I need three years of legal rigor."
That's funny. .