I'm speaking strictly on terms and not using them with any degree of malice or vulgarity.

Normal - adj.
1. Conforming with, adhering to, or constituting a norm, standard, pattern, level, or type; typical: normal room temperature; one's normal weight; normal diplomatic relations.
2. Biology Functioning or occurring in a natural way; lacking observable abnormalities or deficiencies.
3. Chemistry
a. Relating to or designating the normality of a solution.
b. Abbr. n Designating an aliphatic hydrocarbon having an acyclic unbranched chain of carbon atoms.
4. Mathematics
a. Being at right angles; perpendicular.
b. Perpendicular to the direction of a tangent line to a curve or a tangent plane to a surface.
5.
a. Relating to or characterized by average intelligence or development.
b. Free from mental illness; sane.
n.
1. The usual, expected, or standard state, form, amount, or degree: Temperatures have been above normal for this time of year.
2. Mathematics A perpendicular, especially a perpendicular to a line tangent to a plane curve or to a plane tangent to a space curve.

Abnormal -adj
1. not normal; deviating from the usual or typical; extraordinary
2. informal odd in behaviour or appearance; strange

Simply based on empirical evidence collected over a milennia we absolutely do define reality by defining words. (97% is the norm, 3% the abnormal, the deviant, the freak - thats a reality). I do not redefine established definitions to suit PC, I'm sure time will take care of that (eg. gay).

(good measure)
freak
n.
1. A thing or occurrence that is markedly unusual or irregular: A freak of nature produced the midsummer snow.
2. An abnormally formed organism, especially one regarded as a curiosity.
3. A sudden capricious turn of mind; a whim

Yes, but I'd define Transgender as 'Dr. assisted self mutilation' to aid in self hate fulfillment, rather than just a physical process.

There is no social programming for gender. Having had children (M then F) and seeing first hand the predisposition I can say that it is a MYTH (wishful thinking). I can go into detail on how I come to this strong conclusion.

Reason and logic are two different things. Reason is based on and abstract from experience. Logic is the abstraction of reasoning. Therefore, my question stands. If your bald, unsupported assertions are based on experience, then you have reason… if you do. If your unsupported claims derive from pure logic, then you must show the proof. Just for example, to see if you know what you are talking about, please provide a proof that
1/2( 4a-5) (1/2 a + 1/3) + 7/2 a = 6a^2 - 5.
or, if you are not adept at algebra (having suffered from communist public education all your life), please provide a proof that the nature of Man qua Man demands that in society he must have rights.

I disagree with your assessment. I have no dog in this fight, adults can do what they will as long as they are not violating others' rights, but discernment is still important in objective reasoning. Here is the take from the former head of psychiatry at Johns Hopkins. As well, the former head of psychiatry at Boston U found that after reassignment surgery, patients did not experience happiness and tended to have the same issues they had pre-surgery. so-this begs the question...http://www.wsj.com/articles/paul-mchugh-tran...

A gender-aware colleague with an ideological rainbow on her backpack told me:

Sex is what is between your legs.
Gender is what is between your ears.
Orientation is what goes on between the sheets.

Do you intend to "fix" the "erroneous" heads of other people?

Do you intend to do that by force? By law? Or only by your own condemnation of their "immoral" behavior??

Do you know about the brilliant historian of middle class values Deirdre McCloskey?