Not at all. Those things anger most of us taxpayers. But they aren't here to observe your anger, only us. So you're taking out your anger on us, not them.
Are you asking why someone who pays taxes might be angry/hostile towards a demographic that reproduces like rats, repeatedly votes for higher taxes and more welfare while raising nearly 3 times as many hardened criminals than any other group?
Yep. We white guys and gals go to the bottom of the list, even in towns where we were out numbered.
I lived in El Paso Tx which is 90% Hispanic. When I applied to the University of Texas, ElPaso I had to wait three semesters because there were not enough Hispanics in the Civil Engineering Dept. They could only allow ONE white, non-hispanic student into the program each semester due to the racial "imbalance".
Some people are so dense (or so wrapped up in themselves?) that they couldn't notice a nuke being set off beside themselves.
If she can't "endure" the next 18-20 years of a kid like you under foot, she shouldn't be playing adult games. (I guess I better be blunt) She should not be having sex if she's not prepared to raise a kid. Abortion is murder, not birth control.
"At the 2012 Democrat Convention, actress Kerry Washington made it sound as if Republicans were elected, the Civil Rights Act would be repealed (even though a Republican controlled Congress passed it), women’s suffrage would be repealed (even though Republican controlled state legislatures passed it), and slavery would be re-enacted (even though the Republican Party was FOUNDED to abolish slavery.)" ----- I would just like to point out that all those things happened prior to the 1960s and 1970s. Those two decades literally flipped the political spectrum around. I've noticed many Republicans like to point out how the KKK was founded by Democrats, while totally ignoring that the KKK is Republican today...
I agree with most of the article, but this girl is blind to reality if she doesn't think the Republicans in several states have been actively trying to strip away the laws which protect African Americans and other minorities.
I'm also suspicious of the whole school voucher thing. I admit I don't really understand the voucher program, but I don't see why anyone needs some special ticket to switch schools.
She also says that adoption is a viable alternative to abortion, which it may be in some cases, but certainly not in every case, and getting rid of abortion and insisting that all women always carry their babies to term and then give them up for adoption if they don't want them isn't going to help solve anything. The debate over exactly when life beings is dumb. Technically, a sperm and an egg are already living organisms in and of themselves. I don't see why it makes any sense at all to say that life suddenly begins when the two merge (conception), but that prior to that point there is no life. If your argument that life begins at conception is based on the fact that a clump of cells is technically alive, then you must logically say that life actually begins BEFORE conception, because an egg and a sperm are clumps of cells.
Aside from those few issues, I pretty much agree with everything else she says.
1. Planned Parenthood discriminating against Blacks 2. Caucasian students applying for professional schools and state universities 3. Caucasians assumed racist until proven innocent 4. Christians forced to perform on contracts they do not wish to enter?
Hello Abaco, Me too! I could generalize and blame, but that would be unfair to all of those that are undeserving. I also do not profess to be an expert on the reasons for demographic voting differences. It could be men who influence the conditions making it more sociological than biological, and I prefer to look at them as individuals since I also know plenty of very foolish men. Respectfully, O.A.
No, those sorts of programs exist to counteract the other types of persecution which minorities already endure. What I'm talking about are laws or practices that everyone is required to follow and obey, but which only certain groups are actually harmed by. It's a form of discrimination called "disparate impact."
Explain your 2. So college scholarships/tuition assistance for certain skin colors/ethnicity/citizenship should be illegal then? That's discriminatory and unfair.
I don't know if women are smart enough to recognize the connection between their "government exists to give me things" attitude and the utter destruction of America that's the result. I think much depends on how much pain is visited on women between now and 2016. I'm hoping it's a LOT (like women and children starving in the streets). The longer the female agenda goes on, the more depleted America will be and the longer a recovery (if any) will take.
You have a better name for someone who lies about birth control, gets knocked up and expects the dude to be her eternal cash machine to support an offspring he never wanted and was tricked into being part of?
just above you say 'discriminated against',
in the earlier comment you said 'persecution'.
I lived in El Paso Tx which is 90% Hispanic. When I applied to the University of Texas, ElPaso I had to wait three semesters because there were not enough Hispanics in the Civil Engineering Dept. They could only allow ONE white, non-hispanic student into the program each semester due to the racial "imbalance".
If she can't "endure" the next 18-20 years of a kid like you under foot, she shouldn't be playing adult games. (I guess I better be blunt) She should not be having sex if she's not prepared to raise a kid. Abortion is murder, not birth control.
-----
I would just like to point out that all those things happened prior to the 1960s and 1970s. Those two decades literally flipped the political spectrum around. I've noticed many Republicans like to point out how the KKK was founded by Democrats, while totally ignoring that the KKK is Republican today...
I agree with most of the article, but this girl is blind to reality if she doesn't think the Republicans in several states have been actively trying to strip away the laws which protect African Americans and other minorities.
I'm also suspicious of the whole school voucher thing. I admit I don't really understand the voucher program, but I don't see why anyone needs some special ticket to switch schools.
She also says that adoption is a viable alternative to abortion, which it may be in some cases, but certainly not in every case, and getting rid of abortion and insisting that all women always carry their babies to term and then give them up for adoption if they don't want them isn't going to help solve anything. The debate over exactly when life beings is dumb. Technically, a sperm and an egg are already living organisms in and of themselves. I don't see why it makes any sense at all to say that life suddenly begins when the two merge (conception), but that prior to that point there is no life. If your argument that life begins at conception is based on the fact that a clump of cells is technically alive, then you must logically say that life actually begins BEFORE conception, because an egg and a sperm are clumps of cells.
Aside from those few issues, I pretty much agree with everything else she says.
2. Caucasian students applying for professional schools and state universities
3. Caucasians assumed racist until proven innocent
4. Christians forced to perform on contracts they do not wish to enter?
Me too! I could generalize and blame, but that would be unfair to all of those that are undeserving. I also do not profess to be an expert on the reasons for demographic voting differences. It could be men who influence the conditions making it more sociological than biological, and I prefer to look at them as individuals since I also know plenty of very foolish men.
Respectfully,
O.A.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Disparate_i...
http://legal-dictionary.thefreedictionar...
So college scholarships/tuition assistance for certain skin colors/ethnicity/citizenship should be illegal then? That's discriminatory and unfair.
I don't know if women are smart enough to recognize the connection between their "government exists to give me things" attitude and the utter destruction of America that's the result. I think much depends on how much pain is visited on women between now and 2016. I'm hoping it's a LOT (like women and children starving in the streets). The longer the female agenda goes on, the more depleted America will be and the longer a recovery (if any) will take.
What would you call them?
Load more comments...