Mexican Troops Invaded Border, Held U.S. Border Agents at Gunpoint
This isn't the first time, though it may be the first time you have heard of it. Private property violated. Americans threatened AGAIN.
SOURCE URL: http://toprightnews.com/?p=1905
Notwithstanding the plausibility, this kind of overzealous reporting is counterproductive, particularly in bringing the "swing votes" around.
http://www.foxnews.com/story/2008/06/26/...
http://www.cnn.com/2008/US/02/13/border....
http://www.ketv.com/news/update-93-year-...
http://cc.bingj.com/cache.aspx?q=sign+wa...
I hope that last one works.
I realize that went away from the topic but honestly it didn't. Should people be taught the very things I listed they could not be bought easily. Instead we now live in a country that has become crippled by their government. It will take a very long time to undo the damage but it must start some where and soon. Should a single one of those involved in this incident had self respect, honor and courage, this would not have happened. All it takes is one person to stand up for what is right, live it, teach it and others will follow. What do our fellow countrymen believe? Live and let live? Are we not all responsible? Remember while we are not responsible for the actions of others we are all responsible.
It completely corrupts what otherwise may be decent law enforcement personnel - from the bottom to the top.
Footnote -
The Nuremberg Trials established that . . .
Legislation is not the same as law
Legislation must be moral to be lawful
“Government” actions that violate moral rules are criminal
- Price per ounce out of reach of most users,
due to sales taxes, the cost of setting up sales office, and complying with state regulations
- Black market sales growing, mainly due to the above
- Tax revenue lower than expected, due to both of the above
- Vehicle accidents on the increase from people driving stoned (or drunk AND stoned)
- State and local law enforcement asking for more money to enforce prevention of illegal drug activity (and no one saw that coming?)
Before you condemn trying to limit the impact of
drugs on society, you need to consider the consequences.
This article refutes your claims:
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/quora/is-m...
Also your statement about:
" due to sales taxes, the cost of setting up sales office, and complying with state regulations "
is closely related to a prohibition, and shows more government failure in eliminating prohibition laws/regulations.
It is also kinda funny that you mention that the State wants more funding for the War on Drugs, as an argument about the failure of the War on Drugs. Obviously the War on Drugs was not killed, and the many beneficiaries of the War are still fighting for a bigger place at the trough.
As for taxation, regulation, and defining certain transactions of a legal substance as "illegal", I agree that it's just a different form of prohibition. However, the sales pitch for legalizing marijuana was based on expected tax revenue and reduced law enforcement cost.
I do think throwing people in prison for victimless crimes is counterproductive. Go after the black market by enacting heavy fines on unlicensed growers and sellers, and don't worry about where the users got their stash.
The sales tax in CO was set too high (higher than the tax on alcohol), and the regulatory overhead cost was badly underestimated. The state should have aimed to target prices at a reasonable level, to discourage a black market.
"We have not seen a huge onslaught of crime like you might have thought. And fortunately we have not seen violent crime, which is our biggest concern."
This is from the police department in Denver, CO - I think one of the larger places in the state...
http://www.wtae.com/news/local/allegheny...
The Colorado highway patrol has listed a 3% increase in what they call marijuana-related traffic deaths. The admitted problem with that number is that THC remains in the blood for weeks after its reaction delay effects are gone. Is the increased number due to an increased focus on drug impaired driving, or is it an expected effect of increased consumption?
The source is:
John Hudak, Author of Presidential Pork, Fellow @ Brookings, Managing Editor of the FixGov Blog. UConn Alum (B.A., 2005); Vanderbilt Alum (Ph.D., 2012)
as clearly stated in the reference.
Apparently, American lives are expendable to our government. This goes back well before O too.
The Spanish colonization of North America was real, with occupants and the Roman Catholic Church converting natives into catholics and, therefore, second class citizens. The apolalyptico version of what is considered a savage and bloody colonization of Mexico and the rest of America isn´t entirely wrong for "south of the border" none would celebrate thanksgiving. In Tenochtichlan there weren´t any free tribes, it was the capital of the Aztec Empire. Same with the Mayans and the Incas further South. Natives, unlike the Aztecs, were hostile to the occupation of their land and the Church´s aid in colonization was crucial, they introduced a new phenomena to the concept of colonization: guilt. But it was still a very difficult conquest, that extended well into the XIXth Century and the beginning of the XXth.
Mexico and the prior Spanish Colonies had long before occupied and exploited what is now the state of California, New Mexico, Texas, Colorado and the entire south western region of the US. The gold rush were all Spanish-Mexican mines that usually never made it back to spain (the gold), becoming victims to piracy at sea or worse, corruption in america. A great part of the federal reserve is Spanish Mexican gold, as a matter of fact.
But there´s much more. The names of this region´s states are spanish ones, Texas meaning "tejas", which is what great part of the soil was used for: the colonial terracota shingle or "teja". The fact that today many illegals are Mexicans and the border policies are so strict is due to many things, some even amoral and in clear dissadvantage to the people "south of the border". This isn´t a race or cultural issue, let´s not confuse things. This is an economical and political issue.
It´s wrong, I agree, that Mexicans should do this. But isn´t also wrong that they were robbed of their mines and gold, used as cheap labor in the states and left to starve in the waste lands beyond the great texan oil reserve (which is all "american", no doubt about it)? For an official Federal Trooper to attack a border policy isn´t just mear mayhem...
Should those in Mexico clean up their corrupt and dangerous sh*thole, perhaps people wouldn't be attracted to the (declining) prosperity of the US? Mexico should clean up its own problems with or without outside help before supported (and paying for) the expulsion of its people to another land illegally (yes I can prove this too).
So Spain, Mexico's origin, wasn't imperialist when they conquered and murdered millions of natives all over the American continent? What about the extinction of an entire established culture? Imperialist? LOL Mexico and Mexicans should talk.
As for it :too bad about history not being taught in government schools" I agree. Still, if it weren't for the illegal aliens, the crime they bring and the economic burden they create, I wouldn't give a damn about Mexico outside of its food and perhaps, in my younger years, tequila.
I notice that you avoided my questions about Spain.
Then add you are a corporation without the power to purchase land. That is, and was, the U.S. position because there is, and was, no such power delegated to the federal government. If you are the president sworn to uphold the constitution and you deliberately violate it, should you not be impeached instead of lauded?
The U.S. was supposed to be the first nation based upon the rule of law. Your (correct) use of the word “conquest” when referring to the theft of land from Mexico illustrates well that at least from 1803, the U.S. has not been based upon the rule of law and it has been a land-grabbing country just like all the others in Europe. This should be a matter of shame, not veneration.
I did not deal with other aspects of your comments because it would take too long and is not appropriate for a blog.