Hillary Clinton Has A Message For Coal Miners: You're Fired
You know, it seems at some point, the fact that Imperialstic morons like the Obamanation and HillaryBeast would wear out their welcome when they kill off 1 in 5 coal workers, and then want to blow 90 billion to keep it up. (90 Billion of our money, not hers). So far no one seems to interested in asking whose pocket she will raid to pay for all this looting...
oh well, not my problem, and my favorites always seem to benefit from it anyway.
He does not need to have his cash flow cut off by a socialist rat pack of EcoNazis who would as soon also cut off the free speech of any complainers.
He wanted to be a cop but can't with one replaced kidney all there is to make his urine.
What gets me is how Obooboo and Hitlery talk like we already have "alternatives" on hand.
Like what? Solar panels that can really for real light up all of New York state?
Nuclear energy? Like we finally have that safer fusion power now. Bet EcoNazis would still find a problem with that.
How about the diliithium crystals that killed Mr. Spock?
Oh, I know. Maybe they found the wind god of The Odyssey that you could bag to water rocket a ship.
http://www.dividedstates.com/list-of-...
We need them like we need Iran with nuclear weapons, or Flints outstanding water system. They have a history of failure and I do not want them to have 30 Billion to retrain coal workers for jobs that donot exist, after they have forced them to leave. And I certainly do not want them to blow 60 billion on crap like the above. Only their buddies walk away with money we do not have. We cannot afford their corrupt crap anymore.
LOL when I saw the EPIC FAIL photo with FAIL printed on Obooboo's forehead.
I scanned the comment section where someone wrote: "The government is crappy at choosing winners." That's something the Founding Fathers never meant for government to do.
I'm sure she would not allow importation of Coke to make steel. These politicians have bcome so delusional they are totally clueless how the world runs outside of DC. She will be the monkey wrench thrown into to the Works to destroy the Economy.
https://youtu.be/TgttkWQj6D0
Cackles' contradiction cannot be explained away. What she says out loud depends on who she expects to be listening. Cackles is saying that she, like Obama, wants to destroy industry, especially the natural resources extraction industry, on behalf of the viro pressure group lobby by politically imposing costs to drive it out of business. The viro anti-industrial revolution has been doing this for decades, overtly attacking logging, mining, fishing, grazing, drilling, outdoor motorized recreation, etc. for anyone to see who is awake and not an apologist for the nihilistic left and their politicians like Cackles and Obama.
They want to replace industrial civilization with Wilderness utopia. It is why Obama's executive decrees are setting records abusing the Antiquities Act of 1906 to lock up record amounts of land to abolish human use and impose wilderness preservationism. Their ideology regards any measurable human presence as "pollution" against the pristine nature they worship. What they can't shut down by decree the way they do on Federal lands they strangle with regulations and costs.
It's much worse than slowly evolving from Little House on the Prairie. They are primitivist misanthropic wilderness fanatics hijacking the power of government to forcibly prevent and destroy industry and seize private property for Federal parks and wilderness.
As one of these eco-socialists infamously put it:
"To me, ownership and private property were the beginning of the end in this country. Once the Europeans came in, drawing lines and dividing things up, things started getting exploited and overconsumed. But a park takes away the whole issue of ownership. It's off the table; we all own it and we all share it. It's so democratic."
But they still use eminent domain, too. Almost all of it has become "legal" because under statism whatever government does is "legal".
How do we get this to happen? If we just used reasonable calculations for the costs of pollution and charged a tax on them, the market would solve the problem.
Instead people circulated petitions at my church a couple years back to stop emission trading because they think the environment is priceless. They say no matter how good the business, no matter if the profits could build windfarms in the Dakotas to replace coal power, they just want the emissions stopped.
Then you have other people who apparently overwhelmed by enormity of the problem, just stick their heads in the sand. They figure these scientists once told us that all human nutrition came from macro-nutrients, and now they tells us about vitamins and minerals. Forget it, they say, let's just pick an answer we wish were true and stick with it.
It seems the same way with gov't borrowing. We just deny the problem and debate "Can we keep funding 20% of our gov't with borrowing indefinitely? Let's be balanced and hear both sides of the controversy." We don't act until it's a mini-crisis.
Most people who support these various clean energy causes remain blissfully ignorant of the implications of the goals. The horrifying fact is that the promoters of the "clean energy future" are adherents to extreme population reduction, with some believing that the Earth won't be safe until the human population is reduced to no more than 100 million.
By eliminating most energy production, nature will take its course, as famine and fighting over food and water will reduce the human population. A good healthy war here and there wouldn't hurt, so long as the weapons aren't going to harm the environment too much.
You list various things about which people could hold contradictory positions. You give an example: Sierra Club suppressing a study they funded whose results were favorable to nuclear energy. What is the point of these apparently random examples of stupidity?
Are you saying lack of long-term critical thinking results in a whack-a-mole approach, where we learn something like CO2 released by burning coal is causing costly global warming, so we whack the mallet down: coal bad! But then some other problem crops up and we're on to that. So in a few years we'll be whacking the mallet down on the budget. "Who could have ever imagined long-term rates would rise and gov't would have to cut spending or raise taxes right when people are seeing losses in their bond funds, house prices, and business valuations. No one could have foreseen this." It's really unfortunate.