- Hot
- New
- Categories...
- Producer's Lounge
- Producer's Vault
- The Gulch: Live! (New)
- Ask the Gulch!
- Going Galt
- Books
- Business
- Classifieds
- Culture
- Economics
- Education
- Entertainment
- Government
- History
- Humor
- Legislation
- Movies
- News
- Philosophy
- Pics
- Politics
- Science
- Technology
- Video
- The Gulch: Best of
- The Gulch: Bugs
- The Gulch: Feature Requests
- The Gulch: Featured Producers
- The Gulch: General
- The Gulch: Introductions
- The Gulch: Local
- The Gulch: Promotions
- Marketplace
- Members
- Store
- More...
HOWEVER
The Government side has two faces. Yes they will take credit and probably hope it will drive the price down because there's a Catch 22...
They are also talking and actively workingi at raising the federal fuel tax since all that savings is really 'found money' and the government wants it's fair share. (BIG tongue in cheek on the explanation. But a tax hike is in the mill.)
These creatures seem to ignore everything in reality...good or bad. Maybe their on an LSD trip.
I feel a bit like one does standing at the ocean seeing the water line much much further out than normal. Beware.
There is no free lunch, and not in china either. Currently, prices for chinese goods that we buy have been falling. I buy for our company and I see the prices declining. Thats good for us.
I guess time will tell...
While the profit picture isn't good for the American suppliers right now, the important thing is maintaining the cash flow to cover debt and expenses. We have a glut of oversupply sitting in Cushing, OK, so releasing that supply to overseas markets will keep the cash coming in, for the short term. If the doomsayers are correct, and the price remains at $20 or less per barrel for the next couple of years, the industry will be in dire straits, unable to generate profit from their most productive wells.
While we like to think of the U.S. as primarily an industrial supplier of finished products, the reality is that commodities are still a major source of income. Oil, natural gas, coal, minerals, crops, and animal products are big export items, and a dramatic drop in demand for any of those items can put a big dent in our GDP.
With "friends" like the Saudis, we need few enemies, as their purposeful distortion of the market, generating oversupply against a shrinking demand is as damaging an assault on our national interest as a military strike. Ironically, the best thing for the U.S. right now would be a shooting war in the Gulf of Oman, stopping Saudi and Iranian oil delivery.
But isn't 'selling at their best price' exactly what the Saudi's should do. Why should they inflate their prices to the benefit of their US competitors in the fracking industry?
Jan
So, one of the articles I read pointed out that fracking can act as a buffer in a solution: you can turn it on or off relatively quickly. If that is so, then 'turn fracking off' and let the Saudi's loss leader dismantle OPEC and Russian oil. Then we 'turn it back on'.
It seems to me that this sort of price war is in the best traditions of capitalism...I just want us to 'win'.
Jan, not unbiased
When people quote the 'cost' of oil from overseas, from Saudi for example, does that include the transportation cost to get it to the US?
Jan, not an economist
that are as real as the physical principals of gravity or thermodynamics. These economic principals are just as real as the physicals ones and just as difficult to thwart. The "law" of supply and demand is a simplified description of one of these principals. There are close similarities between economic models and those found in physics. Economic systems can be modeled as a recursive dynamic construct. Like the power distribution system it consists of a source, a means of storage, a means of delivery, and a network of loads, or consumers. In such a system it is the load that dominates performance by placing demands on the rest of the system which can either meet the demand or fail.
Your point about people believing that economics can be manipulated without an inherent 'cost' is well stated. Physical laws can likewise be manipulated if you take the cost into consideration (we can make a hollow hunk o'metal fly us through the sky, for example).
Thank you both for making valid points.
Jan
I don't understand your comment.
It might be that a rusty channel in this ancient brain has frozen up.
The illusion was an alternate choice to your comment as if one could ride a roller coaster that wasn't there. Political version is thinking what candidates say has any real importance in their selection or at worst is a signpost of what they will not do. I was waxing eloquent while waiting for boat parts to show up. The system for that is something like the illusion of the roller coaster.
First, many people have bought paper oil at $80 a barrel or greater and are losing big on it now.
Second and the bigger issue is the governments that set budgets on selling $80 oil and will not have the money to fund all their handouts with low oil prices. Not much different than our own government that spends every single dime + it takes in on programs that we cannot afford.
OTOH I am listening to CNBC right now and am more down than ever on central banks pulling their levers. These guys spend as much time on guessing what central banks will do than working out who's creating the things that will be valuable to the economy a few years from now.
People would do technical analysis and momentum speculation even if there were no central bank, but my goodness. We put together this monetary system, and it just motivates people to spend their time trying to get inside its head instead of getting stuff done.
I keep thinking of straightlinelogic said: try to think about what money would be if you'd never heard of the modern monetary system.
http://nypost.com/2016/01/22/the-shoe...
Beware if the federal government offers bailouts. I'm sure they would like to nationalize the oil fields and shut them down to please the eco-nuts and freeze us.
...and oil is expected to drop further...the market is dropping with it...we have broken key support levels and a 50% drop like 1932...2000...& 2007 are on horizon...
Part of the fun!