When a liberal cannot answer a rational point, he falls back on to the good old-never-fail accusation of racism. It is equivalent to two kids arguing in the schoolyard and when one of them is losing and has no counter argument he'll look bellicose and say the only thing he can to end the "discussion." He'll say, "Oh, Yeah!?!"

Racism is a tool of the progressives to try and invoke unearned guilt and to attempt to chill the opposition. It's a threat used when there is no rational argument on their side. I don't care what color skin a communist has, I disagree with them.

how about disliking him because he dislikes the country he lives in and has been given a job that he has demonstrated to the hilt he is incompetent at.
I further agree with Eyecu2

racial profiling? https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?v=646...

And we will soon watch the left attempt to guarantee Hillary's success by way of the "sexism" shield.

Progressives pull out the "racist" accusations when they want to end debate. Those who engagein this type of lazy rhetoric do so because of different reasons. One reason is they are losing the ideological argument, another is they are not equipped to have that argument in the first place.

This whole "racist" thing is just a method. We saw Hillary pit races and socio-economic groups against each other to promote her goals as First Lady. Why, because she adores the ideas of Saul Alinsky - see her 92-page thesis on the subject. Now, the pitting of groups continues toward a Marxist collectivist goal. Obama out Alinskyed Hillary to win, but his IQ is actually much lower. Read "Rules for Radicals", it is what we are seeing, and we should use their methods against them, not flee from their labels.
I grew up with black friends watching TV in the 50s at our home, and have always had friends who were Black, probably more so than did Obama. I respected those who earned it, as with any person I knew. I detest Obama for his Marxist anti-American views, for his posing and lying, for his goal to destroy capitalism - and I do not consider him Black! He is half white, raised with citizenship of Malaysian origin with Muslim loyalties. He would not know how to be a Black man if he had to, he never lived on the streets or was discriminated against. If you are a Marxist, own it, if you are gay, own it. I detest liars. Same goes for white gal Hillary.

This is just foolish. "You're against Obama b/c you're a racist" is the last death throes of this thinking. It's like of like the thinking that gay people will despoil your heterosexual marriage. It sounded questionable to begin with, and now it's completely lame.

I generally support President Obama, and it's not because of race or sex. People oppose him for policy reasons and b/c of the left/right thing that made people hate President Bush. It's not about race.

Racism is too much of an issue in the States. Therefore, it becomes a tool. I have no problem in admitting I´m racist, society made me so and, appart from my upbringing and all, I choose to be racist. Why? Because it really isn´t that big an issue to me. It´s worse to be sexist, in my opinion, and the way I see it nowadays there are no "pure" races anymore. We tend to get darker in hair, eye, and eventually skin color with the centuries. I envy dark skin personnally, my mother and brother have darker skin and therefore have little problems with sunburns. I´m whiter, and therefore the sun gave me freckles and uncomfortable sunburns more than once.

We´re all different, not only in the surface. No two are alike, and that´s just in my opinion. It´s rather great, I might add that as well. Loved it when the US Olympic Team won over in Berlin, leaving Hitler and his ridiculous Arian Army out in the cold. Race, stripped down plainly, is no guarantee of any theory whatsoever. Stastics usually end up wrong when using race facts from sheer observation.

As for Obama well, it´s true that there is racism. But that´s what helped him win the election, partly at least. The first "black" president of the USA, who is much more a mix than pure African Blood, had advantages I believe based on his skin color. But that´s partial, for he´s no fool either. An extremely intelligent man, Obama has proven many times that he can defy the powers that call him out to be a puppet in a suit. A clear example is his strategic and intelligent delay of the inminent attack on Syria. Bush was a neanderthal compared to this brain, sorry to put it this way. And as for Reps and Dems...that´s just jungle talk to me. The two party system is a keen distraction made by "the man".

It's also enlightening to watch these answers that require the person to think of an answer, instead of the usual recital of some pre-rehearsed talking point. When they say "50-50" it probably means that they recognize that they are talking to a white guy and don't want to offend him by saying "100%" This is newspeak for when we used to say "present company excepted" to be polite.

I wonder if the young black student who admitted he did NOT vote for Obama (in 2008) was a racist? If Obama had a son...it probably would NOT have been this young man.

I have been called worse. Those who speak the language have no unearthly idea of what they speak. When Obama goes to Africa and always goes to the dungeons where slaves were held during those times by their task masters and contemplates what took place is this the force that drives his agenda. Just sayin'

One of the reasons I dislike Obama do involve race, I absolutely hate the idea of having a half breed Muslim who's not even an American sitting in our highest office. The fact that I abhor nearly EVERYTHING he represents politically only adds too my negative feelings about him.

The only reason that I said nearly everything instead of everything, is that I did like that he mobilized the young voters more than anyone else in recent history.

Last-gasp effort to protect the president's legacy. I think he should/would be embarrassed by this.