- Hot
- New
- Categories...
- Producer's Lounge
- Producer's Vault
- The Gulch: Live! (New)
- Ask the Gulch!
- Going Galt
- Books
- Business
- Classifieds
- Culture
- Economics
- Education
- Entertainment
- Government
- History
- Humor
- Legislation
- Movies
- News
- Philosophy
- Pics
- Politics
- Science
- Technology
- Video
- The Gulch: Best of
- The Gulch: Bugs
- The Gulch: Feature Requests
- The Gulch: Featured Producers
- The Gulch: General
- The Gulch: Introductions
- The Gulch: Local
- The Gulch: Promotions
- Marketplace
- Members
- Store
- More...
Also, in fact, Roark did "escape" in closing his office and working in the quarry. He could have gone to work for another architect - any second-rate shop would have taken him for his skills - but that was no longer possible for him internally.
When things don't work out, you leave. Simple as that. You don't try to change other people. You do not coerce them, argue, plead, convince, convert... You just go your own way.
Life is too short to spend time trying to make people change, just is.
.
Why do you think Rand used escape as a device for plot resolution in Anthem, We the Living, and Atlas Shrugged, but did not do so in The Fountainhead?
"A device for plot resolution" is indeed a device, and is not a central theme. The central themes are well-known. (1) Individualism versus Collectivism, (2) Man against the State, (3) The Mind on strike.
Lwinn did not suggest escape as a central theme. As much as I admire your insights, this was not one of them.
I think that the USA should look to refugees that are smart, industrious, rich perhaps, and who will improve our country. Forget that freeloaders, violent muslims, and others that just detract from what we have built here.
No, they cannot come just by buying land. They are either allowed into the country or they aren't by the standards of immigration and of temporary entry into the country, whether they own, rent or are nomads.
You can assess what you think of them or anyone else, but what you "feel" about someone is irrelevant to their rights versus being a physical threat. The conservative criterion that has been circulating, based on "contributing to the country" to the satisfaction of others, is a collectivist standard.
Our standards of immigration are set up by mob rule of the majority. They are what they are.
Immigrants are typically discriminated against when they first come, and its up to them to prove that they can be productive members of the society. Thats not going to happen with muslim refugees from Syria, in my estimation, but who am I to judge. If it gets too bad, I will just move somewhere else.
We don't say who can come but there is a national debate on it right now being framed in a false alternative.
.
Roark: "But I don't think of you.”
others' approval to feel good about themselves. . it is sick. -- j
.
Escape to me means removing oneself form within the range of control or from power reach of somebody or something.
Two different concepts, I agree.
In my opinion, shrugging into the Gulch is not an escapist plan. They all want to cause a profound change in the country and the only method available to them is to hasten and precipitate an economic collapse.
with loyalty to reality. . a little wine, though....... -- j
.
I will engage the freeloading bums that ask for money sometimes. I ask them why they think that I should work so they dont have to. That ends the discussion right there.
That said, our daughter also did the math, and offered to buy us a condo near her when we are too old to fend for ourselves. She said that it was the least she could do in return. But she offered: we did not ask.
That is the difference between benevolence and sacrifice.
As for the spouse and kids, I agree. By an measure, you willfully entered an arrangement with a spouse, and it goes with the territory. With minor children, you caused them, you care for them. Again, you may enjoy that, which adds bonus value to your life, so good. Once they cease to be children, they should be capable of self care, and if not, it should be your responsibility to correct the problem, and not anyone else to take care of them, unless that person enjoys doing so to the extent that they believe it is worth the expense to them. While I'm sure your kids are lovely, I have no desire to support them, so make sure they are capable of self support and care. I'll do the same with my kids, and maybe some day we can sit around an old folks home and when other complain about their kids, we can remind them that the child has no objective obligation to the parent. (however, it would of course be my hope that I've been such an awesome parent that my smart and capable children are filled with joy to visit me and find that a relationship with me continues to add value to their lives.)
sary to escape. Not yet. Of course, she died 33
years ago, and things have gotten worse since
then. She named certain conditions under which it
would be "time to quit." I don't think we have
reached that point yet, but we must fight, and
fight hard, to keep from getting there. But
I just do not think Trump is the answer. Praising
eminent domain, getting chummy with Putin...
what's next?! No, I'd rather have Cruz. He's
certainly not ideal, but he has shown a real dis-
position to fight on the Senate floor. And at
least he's not a blowhard cross between Ross
Perot and P.T. Barnum.