Bingo you are now more than two people

Why do things by halves get rid of the left wing of the left at the same time you are dumping the right wing of the left. The whole world would be better off.

How do you know other than by imagination and in the face of proof positive you are making any difference whatsoever other than supporting a continued and measurable slide to the left.

You don't because you found it easier to wait and wait and wait for that imaginary dude or dudette on a white horse to charge in and save the day. You waited for marginally better while things got measurably worse.thanks to your help.

You 'think' but you do not 'know' because you use think as the way out of accepting responsibility.. Think in that context is commonly known as a cop out. Plato invented it. But are you one of the chosen anointed few that Plato stated were exempt from the sin of thinking they could think.

No baseline? Or you didn't bother to look. Does your 'imagination allow you to do that?
So where is this 'better person.' Not on any list of left wing approved candidates I have seen. Just a steady drift to the left.

You can't imagine what things would look like? You don't have much of an imagination. You can keep your imagination. It serves no useful purpose in the real world. It's too one sided but it is good for evading reality - and responsibility.

Prove to me there is no baseline...Careful it's a trick question. It uses facts not imagination.

I thought about that some more. If there is no use playing then why are you voting for other half of the left wing? That sounds like active participation and approval. Your final answer on what to do does not support your final statement defining the situation.

That 's one excuse. I don't have to convince you have to convince yourself... Remember we make independent choices as free people. That's not allowed on the other side.

Remember a vote is a one shot weapon. Two if you count primary and general. But it's versatile. In primary local races matter. especially in precincts. The current rules the partys are following are first fifteen states get free choice voting those that followi the primaries are winner take all. barring rules changes.

You can register democrat and vote for the weakest candidates they have. You can do the same republican but they are hardly worth the effort. You still get to vote for the local stuff and support or nullify the individuals on an individual local basis. So can your friends... THEN you can stay registered that way or re-register as something else depending on how you want to use your vote and what or who is on the ballot. Along way you can create pockets of resistance. saying I'm a Dino I'm a Rino and answer polls saying I'm not supporting this or that candidate. Independents don't get to vote against Hillary in the primary.... do it as a group in your own precinct you create doubt do it in a number of precincts you create fear - why did our party numbers go up and the support for the candidate go down? They are then seen as weak.

In the General you can vote against one and therefore for the other but that is a winner take all situation. So if you vote ...Trump for example or a write in and Hillary wins she gets the entire vote and can claim a mandate or a landslide on the electoral college level. Bush by the way had both but not in great numbers.


In the General you can leave the presidential line blank don't vote for either depending on the state rules it may still go the winner take all column...

Or you can not vote in the General election at all

Or you can not register and not vote in anything including the primary. Which may keep you off the jury selection as well.

The least two are where the under vote disparity comes in. Those eligible to vote who didn't vote Presidential and those who didn't register. That translates directly into a no confidence or a None Of the Above interpretation.. Must be useful I see the left is trying hard to get a mandatory with a fine voting requirement

In a Presidential year it's 35% give or take...

So the goal there is to use your register/not register ability and your vote or note vote ability to deny the winner take all perecentage.

Consider with 30% not registering that's 70% divided by three less those not voting. Democrat and Republican are fairly close but no way with winner take all they are getting a majority much less a mandate or a landslide. Those figures are increasing in the non register non voting category.

At near fifty percent in the off year the winner's actual vote is often less but since many of the states no longer keep records of splinter, write in or third party it has, intentionally, become harder to gauge. But it also becomes harder for any of those elected to claim they represent much more than a fraction in either case.

That's the target information it's a target rich environment with all the candidates falling in that category. Fire your ballot iwhere it will do the most good - your choice your responsibility.

If you want more than a one shot musket with two shots a year allowed talk to your friends in your own precinct. There are a 110,000 battlegrounds that way. 3143 counties and 50 States. Select your own targets method. If you don't have initiative or recall get it. If iyou have winner take all other than federal electoral get rid of it. Or demand the spnumber of registrants, registrants not voting, voting for other than two candidates using write in be counted and verified and published. Limiting general to top two primary vote getter's or any other limit banned. If your county clerk says it's too much trouble they work for you not the other way around. If they won't recall petitition or vote against them in the next election.

If you don't have initiative or recall you are in one of the slave states. Think about it. Much easier at the local level and that includes None Of The Above with 50% of registered voters plus 1 two more good things to add.

Lots of ways to shoot your ballots before it's time for a vowel change

110,000 points of light are hard to put out even for those with billions. And each one costs the money, time and effort. That's my idea of working together and giving back. Attack the weak and weaken the strong.