Big Mac - Sign of New GOP Power Realignment?
Posted by D_E_Liberty 9 years, 1 month ago to Politics
Ina rather stunning development House Majority Leader "Big Mac" is withdrawing his name for election of the next Speaker of the House. Mac was considered a shoo-in as the heir apparent to the speaking ship just a week ago. Why the shocking withdrawal? Simple, he didn't have the votes. why didn't he have the votes? Because the self- selected, so called "Freedom Caucus" ( made up mostly of tea party, libertarian leaning, economic conservatives), who agreed to vote as a block, refused to support him. The reason, they see him as a continuation of the previous Speaker, who led a consolatory capitalist Congress, on the major issues the Caucus members were specifically elected to oppose, I.e. De- funding Obamacare, reforming immigration policy, reducing the deficit, etc. But most importantly, the Freedom Caucus maligned the Leadership for "refusing to put up a good fight" in opposition to The Obama "statist" agenda. While they wanted to stack a mountain of reform bills on the Presidents desk for his veto pen, turning him into "President Nyet", the saw their own leaders turn the lower chamber into Chamberlin style institution of capitulation.
They want some in the speakership who will charge the bureaucratic barriers, and burn down the the walls of progressive imprisonment that their leader not only stood by and watched, but even handed them bricks. the amazing thing, is in Congress of more than 400 members, these 40 Reps have made themselves the swing votes, at least with respect to selecting the next speaker. they virtually have the power to elect, or block any nominee they choose, and they are clearly holding out for a young blood, who's vain' run as hot as their own. Daniel Webster has been mentioned, but it not clear whether even he posses the grit the Caucus wants to see in the next speaker.
The interesting, (and more encouraging) take-away is the new found power of the "economic radicals" who some would say are "radicals for economic responsibility" if not radicals for capitalism. Even more striking is the notion that this mini- movement in Congress is actually the tip of the iceberg sized dissatisfaction the GOP rank and file have toward a Congress, and indeed an entire Federal Government who the see not as the solvers of problems but the source of them. they are furious that the GOP majority they sent to Congress has virtually no major achievements to show for their tenure, including zero victories over a President who's policies they abhor. The result? A Presidential primary field lead by the three candidates who have Virtually NO experience as politicians. the kicker is, I doubt many think Trump would be a great, or even competent President ( leader of the free world is not an " on the job" entry level position). But his populist " Congress is Stupid" message resonates perfectly the the sentiments of the GOP faithful who feel the members they elected based on promises of conservative reform have used and abused their trust, and sold them out to the enemy. The political ramifications? GOP and Libertarian voters may see this as a golden opportunity to ADD to that Freedom Caucus... That same rag tag shirt tail that is currently wagging the entire GOP dog.
They want some in the speakership who will charge the bureaucratic barriers, and burn down the the walls of progressive imprisonment that their leader not only stood by and watched, but even handed them bricks. the amazing thing, is in Congress of more than 400 members, these 40 Reps have made themselves the swing votes, at least with respect to selecting the next speaker. they virtually have the power to elect, or block any nominee they choose, and they are clearly holding out for a young blood, who's vain' run as hot as their own. Daniel Webster has been mentioned, but it not clear whether even he posses the grit the Caucus wants to see in the next speaker.
The interesting, (and more encouraging) take-away is the new found power of the "economic radicals" who some would say are "radicals for economic responsibility" if not radicals for capitalism. Even more striking is the notion that this mini- movement in Congress is actually the tip of the iceberg sized dissatisfaction the GOP rank and file have toward a Congress, and indeed an entire Federal Government who the see not as the solvers of problems but the source of them. they are furious that the GOP majority they sent to Congress has virtually no major achievements to show for their tenure, including zero victories over a President who's policies they abhor. The result? A Presidential primary field lead by the three candidates who have Virtually NO experience as politicians. the kicker is, I doubt many think Trump would be a great, or even competent President ( leader of the free world is not an " on the job" entry level position). But his populist " Congress is Stupid" message resonates perfectly the the sentiments of the GOP faithful who feel the members they elected based on promises of conservative reform have used and abused their trust, and sold them out to the enemy. The political ramifications? GOP and Libertarian voters may see this as a golden opportunity to ADD to that Freedom Caucus... That same rag tag shirt tail that is currently wagging the entire GOP dog.
The next few days could turn out to be exciting drama entertainment as the establishment fights back. We've already seen a lot of that (Meagan's stand-in on Fox this evening). Whoever's driving the Freedom Caucus is the real 'person(s) of interest' to be discovered and watched.
+1
Samuel Adams
both Thurs and Fri. -- j
.
They even picked the right name. Freedom Party Dump the RINOS Recover the Constitution Represent the Citizens.
If it's for real burned to many time to do more than cross my fingers and point out all those wonderful votes waiting out in disenfranchised land they may or may not get.
We'll see
Allow me to be the first to thumbs up this long awaited day.
The creators of that technology shall be, as Woody Allen put it, "... some of the first ones to go against the wall when the revolution comes!"
I am joking of course, a bullet is too good for em.
Nice commentary though! I think we got the gist of it.
.
Charles Krauthammer.
Greta Van Susteren.
But if it happens as I say it might in another comment, Paul Ryan would be great.
Rand Paul, for that matter. Although we'd lose him in the Senate.
And, probably best but least likely, as long as we are fantasizing: David Kelley.
How else can you explain why the top three Presidential nominees (again all of which have never held any elected office) are currently commanding more than 50% of the support in most polls. None of which, I think, anyone would describe as traditional or "establishment" Republicans.
The highest "office holding" candidate is Rubio at less than 9%. Also keeping in mind that the field includes the "Libertarian Candidate" Paul, who is the far more obvious choice among Lib/Tea voters (he is also in single digits).
Though I might wish it otherwise, that 50% can't represent more than a hand full or "traditional libertarian and even tea party voters."
Those "protest voting"(?) top three supporters are sending a message, that they want a President that will challenge the status quo, NOT ONLY AMONG THE STATIST DOMINATED SYSTEM, but also among what has become the Republican establishment, who they are beginning to view as a American version of the Vichy government. (no intent to compare neo-cons, to neo nazis - but I do think many are beginning to shift their support to the Freedom Fighting resistance (despite their small numbers), and away from the Vichy collaborators - while we all await the liberation of Allied Patriot Army) . As you suggest, I hope the gorilla actions of this now "armed" minority, turns into a rebellion and then a full scale revolution, within the party and then the rest of the country.
But I still don't trust any of them. Here's an alleged Mark Twain quote:
"Samuel Clements supposedly said, “While hanging its lawyers and politicians might not help the country as a whole, it would be a great deal of fun and would do no harm to decent folks.”"
should be interesting. . this "freedom caucus" is about 20 percent
of the House R membership, and they appear to be the
only ones determined to change the inside-the-beltway
elitist behavior of the party. . hide and watch!!! -- j
.
BTW, Paul Ryan has been mentioned in this thread. He definitely is very familiar with Rand, and I'll never forget how he faced down Obama (until I thought "The One" was going to skip his knife and go straight for his gun) with actual facts and figures (and logic) in a hearing. I've seldom seen Obama so proven wrong, and so livid.
The latest "tea leaves" I read online within the past couple of hours is that Ryan, while truly reluctant, is being reasonably persuaded to take the post, which he would win. I hope so.