- Hot
- New
- Categories...
- Producer's Lounge
- Producer's Vault
- The Gulch: Live! (New)
- Ask the Gulch!
- Going Galt
- Books
- Business
- Classifieds
- Culture
- Economics
- Education
- Entertainment
- Government
- History
- Humor
- Legislation
- Movies
- News
- Philosophy
- Pics
- Politics
- Science
- Technology
- Video
- The Gulch: Best of
- The Gulch: Bugs
- The Gulch: Feature Requests
- The Gulch: Featured Producers
- The Gulch: General
- The Gulch: Introductions
- The Gulch: Local
- The Gulch: Promotions
- Marketplace
- Members
- Store
- More...
Of course they think that the climate is helped by giving politicians more money and power?
In fact their solution to anything is to give politicians more money and power.
The liberals spend their days talking about the greedy rich not paying their fair share. The truth is that if we were to take every cent from the top one percent of wealth in this country it wouldn't fund government spending for FOUR DAYS.
I was at a Christmans party six or eight years ago where I met a chap who was retired from the UAW. Now some of it was the egg nog talking I'm sure, but he was ranting on about how great Nancy Pelosi was because she was going after those rich bastards who were making all that money on Wall Street. I was talking with the he guy for a little while, and it turns out that he had rolled over $700,000 out of his 401(k) into his IRA when he retired, and of course how smart he was and all. I asked him if he knew who Queen Nancy was going after with all her "get Wall Street" rhetoric. He paused and I said, "It's YOU, ya dope! Your 401(k) didn't get that big on bank CDs." He then informed me that it grew because of his mutual funds, not stocks and bonds. I realized suddenly that it was pearls before swine...he didn't get it, and what's more, he never will.
To heck with Colonel Sanders anyway. Let's hear from The Man who studied for 8 whole years to be president under the (up until now) biggest spender of all time--
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B9puG...
If I was not seeing this in print and I guess on tv news I would think it was a bad joke but it is real and there is nothing that our sensible population is doing about it. They are just not going to their respective representatives and telling them enough is enough. The end result IS going to be that these muslims will not look for employment because they have been given "PERMANENT RESIDENCE" according to the article. The change the homeboy talked about IS going to take place over the next 50 years and unless there is some sort of uprising the country will no longer exist as we currently know it.
into the shallow end, keeping about half for themselves .......
this helps the depth of the pool increase. . sure! -- j
.
(+1 Anyway)
"Boomalay boom on the big bass drum,
Where is the money coming from?
It's used in research, children dear,
For ways to increase the tax next year."
---Ogden Nash
Much appreciated,
iSank
As Tolkien said in "Lord of the Rings" that when there were gatherers and shares there was more gathering than sharing.
Your rebuttal intrigues me though. I am checking my premises. Does it only stem from producers making more from what they are given or did you have other arguments to consider ?
said that the increases in productivity which result from the
complementary specialization he described make everyone
richer -- William learns to do software better and the farmer learns
to do cattle better, so that everyone can have more of each,
with higher quality!!! . this means that William and the farmer
both get richer, so that they can afford to sponsor others
who are learning how to do houses or clothing or tools or
cars or cruise ships better. . they can sponsor the poor
through their chosen charities, or directly. . they can afford
more, and others benefit from it. . capitalism is the way
that humans make everyone richer simultaneously. -- john
.
A modern economy is much more sophisticated of course. I often marvel at the fact that as I spend my day sitting at a my computer writing software someone is raising a cow so that I can have a steak as a result. He's better at raising cows than I am and I'm better at software. We will probably never meet, of course, but our money will.
You mention an ideal world though. I think that a lot of governments right now and in the past have forced the issue, such as money redistribution policies against your will. This helped caused my misconception.
I have been trying to figure out why that philosophy came out in my comment. I can only assume that it is both a remnant of what everyday society teaches and my own observations of our current government.
It amazes me how hard it is to remove implicit cultural lessons.....