Is "careerism" ruining the armed services?
in only two presidential terms, our military has been reduced
to a political mess of restrictive rules of engagement
which hobbles us as a nation. . IMHO. -- j
.
to a political mess of restrictive rules of engagement
which hobbles us as a nation. . IMHO. -- j
.
I agree that we need a President who is Commander-in-Chief, but unless the President happens to have a military background, he (or she) should not be trying to run any war-making efforts. The other problem is the President's use of the military to create distractions from their political careers. This was used by Carter and Clinton before Bush and Obama.
During the Carter regime we openly discussed military takeover and our responsibilities. The end was as long as the Constitution is there we're good. Once it's gone we have a legal right and duty to get it back.
Now we've lost the Constitution to the Patriot Act and a shyster snake armed with Executive Powers and as stated Careerist sell outs in the Pentagon - those conditions have been met.
The people and the country and the current government may not be worth fighting for but the Constitution is what we took an oath to defend.
Forrmer Rechsfuhrer Jack Boot Janet II was entirely correct when she stated the governments big danger was present military and veterans.
But what does this government have to do with the Constitution?
Nothing.
white house;;; he has studied it, but not like you and I do it --
he studied it in order to circumvent it and subdue its defenders!!! -- j
.
Which means it proves blacks can be elected we've had two now counting Bubba. But it doesn't validate the group as able to elect a President. For that, as with women they have to wait until it's their turn again. First walk, then run, then leap over tall buildings.
.
.
.