- Hot
- New
- Categories...
- Producer's Lounge
- Producer's Vault
- The Gulch: Live! (New)
- Ask the Gulch!
- Going Galt
- Books
- Business
- Classifieds
- Culture
- Economics
- Education
- Entertainment
- Government
- History
- Humor
- Legislation
- Movies
- News
- Philosophy
- Pics
- Politics
- Science
- Technology
- Video
- The Gulch: Best of
- The Gulch: Bugs
- The Gulch: Feature Requests
- The Gulch: Featured Producers
- The Gulch: General
- The Gulch: Introductions
- The Gulch: Local
- The Gulch: Promotions
- Marketplace
- Members
- Store
- More...
Then come back and tell all of us how wonderful it is. I also suggest that while you are in one of these countries you strongly criticize the government. They appreciate constructive comments on how they are dong.
this jerk proved my point -- in spades!
This sentence jumped out at me: "A universal basic income, combined with a job guarantee and other social programs, could make participation in the labor force truly voluntary."
See one of the ultimate goals there? It's basically "If you don't WANT to work, then you shouldn't have to." But this isn't a statement fighting against an economic/political system at all. Your own body mandates you feed it, clothe it, and shelter it because of a self-survival instinct. He basically is saying "Reality sucks. I want a new one." He is a child, and he wants anyone to remain a child if they so choose, and let the grown-ups take care of them until the day they die. What the child wants is more important than what the adults want, need, or are even capable of providing. The spoiled brat needs to be taken to the woodshed and be told to grow up and live in the reality that exists.
At least it answers the pressing question - why Rolling Stone has a red masthead. Now we know...
The author relies not on logic or study to make points, but innuendo and emotional appeals. Pathetic. Anyone with any brains can debunk all five of these points with ease:
1. You have the right to what you earn. No more, no less.
2. See point #1.
3. See point #1 again.
4. See point #1 yet again. Your choice to spend does not entitle you to means others chose to save/invest.
5. Government-subsidized business ventures are the road to corruption and cronyism.
There is work or harder work.
And over time your work buys you less, and less, and less.
If you earn too much, you end up in the "rich class", which is surprisingly lower than it was during the "revolution" as the nation continues to cannibalize itself.
Sounds fun.
He is referring to one of my favorite songs!
Where the handouts grow on bushes
And the hens lay soft-boiled eggs
The farmers' trees are full of fruit
..You never change your socks
(This tells us the age group).