What would Rand think of Donald J Trump?
He is a builder of beautiful buildings. He is an American success story. He gets things done. He is his own man. He is wealthy and is an advocate of capitalism but what would Rand have to say about Trump if she were here today? I have not posted in several weeks so maybe this discussion is redundant but I am curious to see what fellow Gulchers have to say?
Previous comments...
If it's all the same to you, I'll build my own business with principles I can believe in and sleep well with at night. If the Machiavellian mindset works for you, you're welcome to it. I'd rather build value for myself and my clients where we both benefit than to buy a favor from some politician so I can jam my power down someone's else's throat.
This garbage about how that "won't cut it in the actual business world where profit is life or death for the company and payroll for its employees" is pure horse manure. Anybody espousing the trash you're spewing likely has no idea what building a real business is like.
Go vote for Trump if you like, but don't come crying to me when you get an unprincipled, loudmouth, incompetent windbag jamming more government policies nobody ever voted for down your throat.
As for me, I'm voting for Ted Cruz.
Balance the budget? How? I haven't heard Trump ever say that the budget needed to be balanced. I also have never heard him mention one thing he is going to cut from the budget. Enlighten me.
Protect your property? I guess he'll protect your property as long as he doesn't want it for himself. You don't happen to own any land near a casino do you?
You mention 3 specific things you want Trump to do, and he has either not addressed them at all or simply done the exact opposite of what you are saying in real life.
That brings me to the last thing I am going to say in the discussion with you. You are either a troll (meaning I have been played like a fiddle) or you are an idiot/ignorant of Trump's record or complete lack thereof. Either way, you are not worth my time. Go cast your 2 votes elsewhere, and have a nice day. As for me, I feel dumber for having bothered with you in the first place.
At the public outrage against it "he told Neil Cavuto on Fox News:'I happen to agree with it 100%. if you have a person living in an area that’s not even necessarily a good area, and … government wants to build a tremendous economic development, where a lot of people are going to be put to work and … create thousands upon thousands of jobs and beautification and lots of other things, I think it happens to be good.'” http://www.theguardian.com/commentisf...
I don't want a president who listens to bleeding heart stories and gets involved in social justice. Just run the country.
Are you saying Trump has done this?
http://www.nationalreview.com/article...
and this:
http://michellemalkin.com/2011/04/22/...
Trump's goal is to stop that destruction. A fundamental difference.
Don't look at Kerry, and Obama, as cowards or incompetents - everything that they do accomplishes their goals - to destroy the country. This maybe difficult to accept, but if you add up all that they have done, their deeds speak for themselves. At this point, the country is in such an abyss that Trump may be the last parachute available for our eventual splatter.
It's like the people selling this crap have gone so far that even people not involved in promoting politicians can believe the most absurd claims. I kept hearing this with President Bush, how his puppet masters had set the goal of destroying the United States. It's beyond absurd. People who go into politics and get to that level are good at building networks, remembering people, and learning to navigate all the interest groups and ideologies. They're not people who decide they want to destroy the country and decide to go into politics to do it. It's just absurd, but there are more media choices than ever and people doing commentary have to say more and more bizarre absurdities to get attention.
Are you saying that Obama and Kerry are not cowards or incompetents, or just not to look at them that way? Kerry is definitely a coward and incompetent as a human being and especially as a leader, he has already proven that in 1968-'69 and again in 1971 in front of the whole world. I believe they both are so incompetent, they have no idea what they are doing, no idea that they are destroying this country, and making complete asses of themselves. No American could possibly have an agenda to destroy their own country especially someone with children. Do they really want their children to grow up in the mess they're creating? It's gotta be incompetence, or some other extreme mental disorder. We as Americans are also incompetent cowards by leaving them continue the degradation of our country. How do we even tolerate those that just close their eyes and still support these kinds of people? Hillary is next for the chopping block. If she runs and gets elected I don't even want to live here anymore, and I'm really too old to move to another country now. How could any true American possibly even support her, who would be willing to take the chance with all the 'Clinton' unknowns? _ Nuff said, those are just my opinions, I could be wrong.
Obviously that's why Hillary was chosen for Secretary of State, for her incompetence. Thinking back, many of them have left this administration, perhaps they weren't incompetent enough for the king. There really must be a devil..
And you can still sing ROCK in the USM instead of USSA?.