So he thinks that a mere theory should cause physicists to spend their time proving him wrong, instead of spending their time and money on what they have the tech and evidence to investigate. If he thinks it'll work, he needs to demonstrate it.

In the words of Bugs Bunny, "What a maroon!" The last time someone reported ridiculous hydrogen uptakes, it was proven that the uptakes were of ... water.

Some metals can absorb hydrogen. When I worked in industry, that was part of my job, but this idiocy gives people like me a bad reputation.

Cold fusion heats up: Fusion energy and LENR update
http://experimentalmath.info/blog/201...

Rossi ECat Patent Granted By USPTO
http://pdfpiw.uspto.gov/.piw?Docid=09...

Tell me why they're wrong.

Observation of abundant heat production from a reactor device
and of isotopic changes in the fuel
http://www.elforsk.se/Global/Omv%C3%A...

The point is interest and consideration for this is moving a bit off the fringe. He's more than a bit arrogant in his statements but what if he's right? Oil's being dumped to the tune of 2 million barrels a day over demand and the falling prices are the result. Are the oil producers taking this as a serious threat?

I'm just saying its worth a look and if they are right the world changes.So heap on the skepticism I can take it. I used to argue against man made global warming on liberal sites.