- Hot
- New
- Categories...
- Producer's Lounge
- Producer's Vault
- The Gulch: Live! (New)
- Ask the Gulch!
- Going Galt
- Books
- Business
- Classifieds
- Culture
- Economics
- Education
- Entertainment
- Government
- History
- Humor
- Legislation
- Movies
- News
- Philosophy
- Pics
- Politics
- Science
- Technology
- Video
- The Gulch: Best of
- The Gulch: Bugs
- The Gulch: Feature Requests
- The Gulch: Featured Producers
- The Gulch: General
- The Gulch: Introductions
- The Gulch: Local
- The Gulch: Promotions
- Marketplace
- Members
- Store
- More...
I have an observation in business and I wonder if you see the same in school.
People from these countries that are failing (I have people from India and China in my teams) seem to have more of a capitalist attitude and hard work ethic than people from the US. Not always the case but it is more common among the returning to the 3rd world nations.
I had a team in India that just seemed superhuman in what they were getting done. I went to India to do some training and face to face relationship building. I found out they were doing 12-14 hour days. They did not say a thing, they just were making sure the work was getting done. I expanded the team after that, but the thought occurred to me, no American team would do this without letting you know that you are overworking them and taking advantage of them.
I wonder if you see similar things in education?
So apparently you do this and find it useful. How do you manage a team in India? What level of specifications do you need?
I will say that the times I have had a programmer from here working in Malaysia temporarily the ability to have work going on over a significant portion of 24 hours has been pretty amazing.
You will get more work out of India for about 1/3 the money. However they are not typically creative thinkers and the product plans and software design documents need to be exceptionally well thought out. They will write the code exactly as specified.
This brings to the two kinds of conditions underwhich development in India has worked well.
1) software design documents are very highly detailed and no creative thinking will be involved with writing the code.
2) they are maintaining your previous version, fixing bugs and doing minor updates to keep it alive while your company still supports it.
If on the other hand you want creative innovation keep the coding that needs this in your stateside teams.
It's interesting that in the face of people who are clearly very bright and very hard working we still seem to lead in creativity and innovation.
I read a study at one point where they took pictures of say a tiger in a meadow, a tiger in a forest, a bear in the same meadow and a bear in the same forest. When shown two of the pictures for just a second back to back Asians would recognize them as different if the background changed, western society would recognize they were different when the animal, or center of the picture changed. Only about 10% in both groups recognized them as different all the time. What this says is that Asians look a the full picture and work into the details. Western culture looks at the center detail and work out from there.
It may have some bearing on this issue. Asians are looking at the whole picture as it is. When the whole picture is in view and defined in your mind it is much harder to jump over to another picture in your mind. Much easier to describe the picture you currently see and deal with it. This also would explain to some degree the unwillingness to act without full informaiton.
We Americans tend to focus on a few key points and ignore the rest. That leaves a lot of creative room that is undefined in our minds. It also allows us to act more quickly.
It is an interesting study on perception and may have something to do with this creativity issue as well.
We each calculated what we called the efficiency quotient - the amount of time in the day that we each spent studying divided by the time available for studying. Carefully applying allotted times for meals and by mutual consent - an 11:00 PM break for some popcorn we would make and sit back and enjoy.
views on charity are very simple. I do not consider it a major virtue and, above all, do not consider it a moral duty. There is nothing wrong in helping other people, if and when they are worthy of the help and you can afford to help them. I regard charity as a
marginal issue. What I am fighting is the idea
that charity is a moral duty and a primary virtue. Right on!
All that is left is a begrudging giver and a entitled receiver. Both are less civil as a result and this creates a cyclic loss of civility within a society.
Jan
AR, "Faith and Force: The Destroyers of the Modern World" PWNI, 61
Jan
much easier to turn the other cheek and walk away.
Jan
You can blow your nose in a napkin.
But don't laugh too hard, you'll soon be able to decorate your cardboard box with Fed Reserve notes.
the customers papering the walls!!! -- j
.