13

What the Hell America? Study Shows More Americans than Ever Support Banning Books

Posted by Zenphamy 9 years, 3 months ago to Philosophy
76 comments | Share | Flag

From the Article: "According to a recently released Harris Poll survey, the number of Americans who would support the banning of books has doubled between the years of 2011 and 2015.

28% of the 2,244 U.S. adults surveyed answered yes to the question “Do you think that there are any books which should be banned completely?” This same question was answered yes just 18% of the time back in 2011 when the survey was taken last.

“While it’s still a minority perception … I felt that from 18 to 28 percent in just four years was a rather surprising growth,” Harris Poll Research Manager Larry Shannon-Missal told Library Journal.

Some of the questions were relating to what children should be able to read in school, while others asked which books should be taken off the marketplace entirely.

What was also interesting about the study was the fact that 71% of those surveyed, even those who did not support the banning of books, were open to books being rated in a way similar to movies. Also, it seemed that many people wanted to ban books that were controversial and opposed their religious beliefs. Some of those surveyed wanted to ban the Bible, while others wanted the Koran banned, others wanted any books banned that supported the ideas of creationism, and still others wanted to ban atheist texts."
-------------------------------------------
What the Hell is Right. Satan's Crispy Balls
Religious belief systems keep screwing with freedom and liberty.
SOURCE URL: http://thefreethoughtproject.com/americans-government-start-banning-books/


Add Comment

FORMATTING HELP

All Comments Hide marked as read Mark all as read

  • Posted by $ MikeMarotta 9 years, 3 months ago
    Here is the link to the actual Harris Poll cited in the article: http://www.theharrispoll.com/health-a...

    "Politically speaking, Republicans are nearly twice as likely as Democrats or Independents to believe there are any books that should be banned completely (42% vs. 23% & 22%, respectively).
    In addition, adults who have completed high school or less are more likely than those with higher levels of education to believe there are any books that should be banned (33%, vs. 25% some college, 24% college grad, 23% post grad)."
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by CircuitGuy 9 years, 3 months ago
    I am surprised. We have more openness of ideas today because of the Intenret. Its seems pointless, even if for those who don't agree with free speech to start banning or rating books. Moreover we don't have recent sensationalized stories of neo-Nazi books or something like that becoming popular. It seems like these would-be censors should focus their efforts on modelling China's Internet firewall.

    Apart from the methodolgy, I'm truly surprised people favor censorship in any form more today than in the recent past. .
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
    • Posted by strugatsky 9 years, 3 months ago
      It makes sense. Before the Internet, people lived in their bubbles and felt that the world around them shared their beliefs. Being exposed to other views makes one resent those of other opinion. They have always been self-righteous bigots, but now they're in contact with other bigots.
      Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
    • Posted by blackswan 9 years, 3 months ago
      We read about things like the holocaust, and say, "tsk, tsk, how could they?!? I'd never do that." Then, when we get the opportunity to act on that assertion, we do exactly as the Germans (and many others) have done. Part of the problem is that we're never taught the Constitution or the Federalist Papers or the writings of the enlightenment, so we're operating on emotion only. For Voltaire to get what he meant when he said that he would fight to the death for your right to say what you want, he had to go far beyond emotion. If we're going to be like Voltaire, we must think deeply about what we believe and how we'll act. Otherwise, we'll be carried along on any stray current, like most of the people who've gone along with the massacres. It's our choice, but it has to be a choice based on reason (or not).
      Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by InfamousEric 9 years, 3 months ago
    While I have no issue with limiting access to certain types of texts based on who would have access to them.

    Outright banning of just about any literature is in my opinion anathema to free thought.

    (However, to clarify, I'm not ready to populate a children's library with Playboy magazine, nor do I have much issue with banning certain forms of exploitation publications. However, most would probably refrain from classifying these as "literature".)
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  

FORMATTING HELP

  • Comment hidden. Undo