I think the motto for Hillary's presidential aspirations should be, "How much can you prove?".

If she has nothing to hide, why is she worried about the fedgov looking at her private and business email? Innocent people have nothing to fear from the feds.
(har har har har)

Nixon was an innocent pawn compared to these disgusting power hungry traitors.

The Clinton's need to go down. This country needs a good and honest example of real justice. Dinesh D’Souza got his for a minor infraction in comparison to what they have done. He paid the price, and now they continue to attack him because he is still willing to expose the truth. Hillary should already be in jail. But somehow she remains exempt from the law. It's to a point I cannot even be friends with people that still support her anymore. What did they use in the Kool-Aid to warp these peoples thought processes?

The more the republic begins to resemble a democracy where a simple majority rules, and the more the people are evenly polarized, the mechanism of governance falters. The ratio of providers of wealth to receivers is nearly even, and the Democrats have recognized that the institution of government can become an autocracy if more become dependent on the transfer of wealth. Everything they now stand for is simply finding most effective way to steal wealth from the providers and make more of the population dependent on government's distribution of the stolen wealth.

Obama has become Caesar-like in his challenge to our elected representatives. Whether it's out of supreme narcissistic arrogance, or seizing an opportunity, he recognizes he can get away with actions that would get a white male President impeached, because of the representatives' fear of a race war. Clinton hopes to have the same edge out of fear of society-breaking gender conflict, but she lacks her husband's skill at skirting the law, making her efforts clumsy and increasingly harder to ignore.

One bit of news that hasn't yet been taken up by the media is the fact that Clinton (purposely, no doubt) chose not to appoint an Inspector General for her entire tenure as Secretary of State. Her successor, John Kerry chose to instate an IG as one of his first acts. The question has to be if Kerry did this hoping to reveal to the world the questionable actions of his predecessor, hoping to replace her as the party's nominee for the President. If he did, his own connection with the wretched Iran nuclear agreement has undoubtedly squashed his chances for that outcome.

This story is done for me. So is Hillary Clinton. Its obvious she is a reincarnation of Nixon, in that she hides and protects only her only image- leaving us citizens to fend for ourselves. We dont want another one of those in the white house.

All hail to the Teflon Queen.
What her entitled majesty says just plain goes.
Such as "I am not a crook."
You should PC know that.
We should also all bow before any image of her royal personage.

I see you took the red pill...

I guess that if I had a D after my name, I could tell the IRS
to go hang. . but character demands otherwise. -- j
.

Yes this is BS-you think the average person could get away with this?

Like the Donald said, she should be in jail.

This is where the hacker group Anonymous could come in handy. Grab and publish those emails before they disappear forever.

The problem is not what they are doing. There have been scoundrels just as bad since the beginning of humankind. The problem is that they get away with it. That tells you more about how far we have fallen as a nation, than any other example.

What is fascinating about this story is how brazen the looters are about covering up their corruption. This smacks of the "You can't catch me." nursery rhyme tease.