Will the Cato Institute Uphold Intellectual Property?
Cato Unbound has sponsored a number of anti-patent articles. This article is typical in that the author is not a patent attorney, does not have a technical background, and makes a number of basic legal and factual errors, but is somehow an expert on patents.
Good essay db.
It will come down to where they figure the most money to take is.
I want to be clear that I am utterly in favor of protecting innovation and intellectual property. I just believe that utilizing copyright law prevents the copying of the work but allows the industry to build on concepts which fuel growth.
My objection to patents on software would not be as strong if the patent office had limited them to non-obvious solutions. For example the algorithm patented by the LZW patent falls into the non-obvious category. Most others I've read are quite obvious to a skilled practitioner in the field.
This, of course, brings us to the independent creation argument which says that an independent creator of an idea has just as much moral right to it as any other. If you only patent really unique ideas, this will happen rarely, if you patent the obvious then it will happen every day.
I find the whole wiring argument one of the kinds of things that lawyers do to try to convince someone that a horse is a cow. Software and electronics are two different things. It would be easy to allow one to be patented and not the other.
I don't actually know why I typed this, you will probably either hide me or call me names, but I also don't intend to be bullied.
This is your post so I guess you can hide anything you want.
I do believe in IP protection I think it's important so your repeated demands that I acknowledge the phrase about the wealthiest countries protecting their IP is something we agree on. We just have different strategies about how to protect IP and encourage technological growth. I suggest that as someone who's run a software company since 1994 I do have a valid perspective on the problem.
I'm here because I have a high degree of agreement with the goals of the site and those few things I disagree with are worth discussing. I could spend my time on liberal sites arguing with people who think "You didn't build that" but it's actually more satisfying to talk to people who do want to build things -- and know what it takes.
You are the lowest low life.