I remember only being offered one of two.

God I'm old!

and people think that a college or university education is some how valid. ca, the land of the fruits and nuts.

Get over it. You don't get to tell Africa they can't have big game trophy hunts. Economics!
http://www.luxuryhunts.com/index.html

"gender queer" is one of the choices? What planet am I on????

I am a number 7. I was denied admission.

Gee, dorm room assignments much be so much easier now.

If there is such a question on the list, then that university is probably not worth signing up with : already rotten to the core by cultural marxists.

Oh the bathroom signs. 6 of them, which one will be used for which room. How to distinguish between the skirts with female parts and the skirts with male parts under them on the signs? What serious problems we face.

Well, I'm glad I never lived in a college dorm. At\
least at the barracks when I went to Naval Radio-
man School, no men were allowed in there. If fe-
males wanted to mess with guys, they had to do it
outside of there, and they weren't allowed to bring
them in there and inflict that danger on the rest
of us.

If I went to that university, I would not know which lavatory to use. I'd need to run to where I live in order to urinate. That may prove to be inconvenient.

I don't know what those words mean. I hope everyone gets confused, and we can just forget about group identity altogether.

I'm laughing that queer used to be epithet. I'm glad they've taken back that word, even though I don't know what at means. At least I won't laugh if I make an honest mistake:
"Who's the man who works in the supply room?"
"He's actually not a man."
"She's a woman?"
"No, no, a queer."
I would think the person saying this was a full-on homophobe. I feel old now.

I would say "Other" and pick Ferengi. And demand "our" own bathrooms.

Male Lesbian with no boobs and a big Johnson!

Will the idiocy ever stop? That's a rhetorical question.

Actually, I find this both interesting and reasonable...OK, and a bit humorous too. My main complaint is that the sexual orientation options are too limited: "bi-sexual" actually describes a lot of the people I know, most of whom are in traditional hetero relationships now (but who have an adventure or so in their past). I think that should be the default...(at least here in CA).

I remember men and women sharing a single nearby bathroom (labeled for Women) at a camping event (the Men's room was waaaaay over by the entrance) and I was totally pleased by how well it worked. (I will add that this occurred amongst almost militantly courteous people. Also that this took place in Missouri, not in Calif.)

I think we are a bit close-minded about these things.

Jan

How about "self-served/independent?
That can apply to, not only gender, but also marital status, education, income, religion, hobbies, political affiliation, etc.. Wow! This could really save time on an application.

I personally thing we need to change ALL this identity crap into the following.

Identify your State:
1) Animal
2) Vegetable
3) Mineral

Please Identify your Species:
1) Mammal
2) Foul
3) Reptile (Lawyers/Politicians)

Please identify your Sub Species
1) Human
2) Non-Human (Also Lawyers and Politicians)

There ya go no more race crap...

I like the classic joke:

Sex:
0 Male
0 Female
X Other (write in) YES