NY Times Review of Rand Paul
I don't think Ayn Rand though much of Libertarians of her era--too wishy-washy.
But if the GOP rejects him as their candidate to beat Hillary, might he bolt the reps and run as the Libertarian candidate?
But if the GOP rejects him as their candidate to beat Hillary, might he bolt the reps and run as the Libertarian candidate?
I like Rand Paul's pragmatic approach to easing the Libertarian ideas into the Republican Party, rather than his father's all or nothing approach. Ron taught, where Rand may be able to influence and implement.
If the Republican's reject him, which by all appearances today they probably will, I just don't know if he can motivate the Libertarians as much as his father did.
It'll be fun to watch in any event and I think he is radically different and better for us than anyone either party can otherwise offer.
"But tucked into Mr. Paul’s lengthy monologue — its 76,000 words would fill a 300-page manuscript — was another narrative, told in a sprinkling of obscure references. He cited"
There was no mention of what he said or why he referenced it, only a law he cited.
I need to know more. I don't want another candidate that remakes himself on a daily basis. I don't think he will bolt, he has done a pretty good job of coalescing inside the beltway, So far he has not stepped on anything too controversial.
Too early to tell about the next presidential election.