i did see "Mitt" on Netflix. it was pretty good. I think he has the lead because people know his name, not because they'd vote for him. I sincerely hope we don't see him running again.

I think that if the GOP tries to put up 'Mittens' again, it will be the last nail in the coffin.
I'm sick and tired of choosing between two bowls of crap for breakfast, if ya know what I mean.
Rand Paul/Gary Johnson would be a ticket I could vote on without much trauma to my conscience. Beyond that, I must confess that I am rather skeptical of most of the other choices.

And the 2016 Presidential Race goes to Hellary.

Compared to what we have now, anything would be a marked improvement, excepting, of course, the Anointed One's hand-picked pantsuited successor, The former president's commander in chief.. Sadly, I could see the people who voted for the novelty of a black president vote for the bad side of Clinton for the same novelty factor - not the "lesser of two evils" or that she's particularly qualified, but "Gee, it'd be cool to have a woman in the white house", just like "Gee it'd be cool to have a black man in the white house". It'd be like electing Liberace because he's Gay. (OK, that he's been dead for years wouldn't likely matter much...)

Me? If it's a novelty you want, elect someone who is also qualified, skilled, AND was NSA during a nasty part if history - Condi Rice. Otherwise, people need to get their collective brains out of the clouds of sparkle-rainbow fantasy island and elect someone who will make a DIFFERENCE rather thal be kitschy.

For me? That'd be Rand. All business, I think he COULD reach across the aisle *and* be tough when it's in the USA's best interest, and not a wishy-washy pushover or a Self-entitled leader-for-life wannabe.

Of any candidate who has ran for the office in 20+ years in either party, Mitt has far more ability to make the country successful.

There are lots of people who don't like him for lots of reasons that have nothing to do with the office. If anybody has anything they can contribute to that list that is not related to:
his religion
his family
his wealth
his haircut
his race/sex/party

I'd like to hear it.

These are the usual things he's attacked on, none of which have a thing to do with being president. In the three debates he had with BO there was no question that he wiped the floor with BO in the first and second and the third was at best a tie because of the "Moderator" interfering on behalf of BO. Everything she interjected was proved to be erroneous. Instead of acting as a moderator it was clear she was protecting "her man".

Mitt has already said he is not going to run and I expect that he won't, but I can assure you that he had been president for the past year, the economy would not be on the verge of taking a terminal nosedive that will make 08 look like a one day correction.

Mitt Romney seems like a decent man, obviously has a savvy head for business but fails miserable at the Political game hence the flip flop flip flop.
Hillary - God help us ALL
Paul Rand - seems too much like his crazy Pappy. Sorry, you do need some taxes, otherwise how do you pay for a Military unless you intend not to have one.
Gov Walker, WI - don't like the looks of him, sorry.
Chris Christie - uh no, this country will not elect an overweight person, heart attack waiting to happen.
Marco Rubio - nice looking but messed up with his gang of 8 and immigration.
Bobby Jindal - maybe.
Doesn't seem like We The People have much of a choice and the American voters are just dumb enough to keep putting Marxist/socialist people like Obama/Hillary into office.

Some of the comments in this thread show why Repbulicans have a problem.
I don't care as long as it not a conservative (a rephrasing of the statement)
Don't want a moderate

With mind sets like those who ever the Dem's nominate will win.

Consider this, just for the hell of it -- How about Jeb Bush?

Loser. Liar. Politician.
Hooray, the GOP loses again!
Now if only the Democrats can lose, too, then the people would win.

No offense to Mitt, but this is typical republican move...they smell a gain and they roll out a re-tread tire THEY want to see in office and not what the American people are calling for (read in amnesty).

God we really need a third, fourth, or fifth party to choose from.

The appropriate RNC choices should be Rand Paul, Allan West, Dr. Ben Carson, Alan Keyes, Mike Lee or perhaps Ted Cruz.

And no, I do not dislike or have anything against Mormons.

Copied from another post that I put this on. sorry for any problemsw/
Governor Romney is an honorable man with insight into ho to make the country more efficient and effective in creating jobs and restoring the economy. That said, there is absolutely no way he will ever win the Presidentcy. The MSM will complete the job of his distructin if he runs again and maybe even if he doesn't.
He and others like him represent the thing they and the progressives fear most: a truly competent man who knows what needs to be done and is capable of actually doing it, not just offering "Hope and Change".

How would he differ from BO?