- Hot
- New
- Categories...
- Producer's Lounge
- Producer's Vault
- The Gulch: Live! (New)
- Ask the Gulch!
- Going Galt
- Books
- Business
- Classifieds
- Culture
- Economics
- Education
- Entertainment
- Government
- History
- Humor
- Legislation
- Movies
- News
- Philosophy
- Pics
- Politics
- Science
- Technology
- Video
- The Gulch: Best of
- The Gulch: Bugs
- The Gulch: Feature Requests
- The Gulch: Featured Producers
- The Gulch: General
- The Gulch: Introductions
- The Gulch: Local
- The Gulch: Promotions
- Marketplace
- Members
- Store
- More...
When I go to a restaurant, I will tip well for outstanding service, or poorly for poor service. But my tip budget goes down as food prices go up. When wages rise because of minimum wage hikes, those servers no longer get the 15%-20% I would normally budget to reward excellence.
last week. . we were the last table of her night, and she had done
a majestic job of personalizing our meal, scrounging more of
our favorite stuff, making us feel like a king and queen -- and she
probably has to pay them to let her work there (very fine restaurant:::
Sea Captain's House in Myrtle Beach).
this intrusion by the govt screws everything up. -- j
.
This would readily turn me into a non-tipper, and leave a note. Maybe I should consider the calculation for what it means to the price, and simply deduct it from the tip. (e.g. 20% -> 10%).
It is interesting that the Dutch generally don't tip. Those in the service industry consider that their job that it is an insult to imply they need tips to supplement their income (or that you are superior because you tip). I kind of like this in some ways. It makes life easier than carrying change around for cabs etc. and people take their cab/waiter/etc jobs seriously.
I live in Las Vegas, and I ONLY tip out of embarrassment in front of people who believe its some sort of duty. I never tip at buffets where I have to get my own food and often my drinks too. If I tip, its never more than 10% and only in places I want to go back to and who have the same employees every time. I have always thought its up to management to pay the employees what they are worth to give the level of service that is set by the establishment. Frankly I would rather be "served" by a robot system that doesnt interrupt my conversation, is always available, and has no "expectations'. Not to mention it would be cheaper. My experience is with my friends, NOT the server
People in other industries need experience in serving the public face to face and a restaurant is a great place to get it. When experience first hand that your job and your income comes directly from your customers/clients it is a lesson that will last a lifetime. I think the greatest benefit of the fast food industry is that it provides this experience for young people seeking income to supplement their school/living experiences. I have no sympathy whatsoever for those that complain that they can't support a family on those wages. The business model for fast food is cheap and fast. Bums that do not appreciate the "part-time" job and give slow, expensive and lackadaisical service need not apply.
In response to the title....
Divisive politics putting every group at someone elses' throat appears to have already destroyed goodwill.
Along with manners, respect for others, property rights, and simple pleasures.
Then again, my theory is that this is really all about destroying the fast food industry, or forcing it to unionize.
Answer:...No more restaurants, no more eating out.
Maybe a surge in Cooking class students, Hotel rooms with mini kitchens, OR...will we get a new Restaurant/service paradigm...standardized service and only those that set the bar the highest will be patronized.
Either way you look at it, something we all cherished and found valuable will be gone or at least reduced to a rarity.
But so what, along comes these two yank seppos in Cairns and they engage a taxi service. The driver places me in the front passenger seat and my companion in the back seat. Already, this is weird, in the US you never ride up front with the driver in a taxi - security I suppose.
The driver is incredibly talkative and funny and having a blast with the seppos. But, I ask him how come I can ride up front? He looks at me with a straight face and says "What's the matter, mate, afraid I'll break wind?"
I tipped the guy despite all objections and just said the comedy was worth it alone!
“If you thought Seattle activists were passionate in their successful push for the $15 an hour minimum wage, just wait until you see their fervor for rent control. It was on display Thursday night at City Hall when City Councilmembers Nick Licata and Kshama Sawant hosted a town hall meeting that drew an overflow crowd. People seethed about the skyrocketing rents, and vowed to do something about it in spite of the political sway that landlords and real estate developers hold. To this group one speaker, Flora Ybarra, said this: "We are going to show you we are the people with the power." The crowd roared its approval.”
Beside the minimum wage, the Seattle City Council is now pushing the new and improved Rent Control. There being a shortage of apartments in Seattle (and so the prices are going up) so they have convinced the people if they impose rent control there will be more affordable apartments available. That makes a lot of sense to an investor. Just put your money out there to build a bunch of low income apartments that the government will be controlling the rent on. I can’t even calculate just out how many investors will actually jump into this plan to correct the shortages of low income apartments. The council won’t listen to other cities that have actually solved their rental availability problems by building low income units and letting the market determine the rent. More apartments available, lower rent. What a unique concept, huh?
FYI, I worked at McDonald's for 0.90 per hour and NO tips. Different times.
Are ya happy now liberals?
I'm a tiny bit aspie too, so I prefer to interact with machines. There are two grocery stores next door to one another, and I always go to the one that has automated point-of-sale units b/c it just seems a little quicker and easier to skip the small talk.
This is interesting to contemplate. One of the things you look for in science is the concept of a 'baseline'. What is the normal situation? (This is what is wrong with many of the climate discussions - they lack an agreed-upon baseline, or any referent to baselines at all.) What we have here is the movement of a 'baseline' to advance the case of 'what a robot can provide'. A robot has a certain initial cost, maintenance cost, replacement interval; a human has wages, work habits, sickness or other time off. A human has personality, a robot has programmed responses, but a robot never goofs off or gets angry.
It is like one of those before-and-after pictures with the slider in the middle. Increased minimum wage moves the slider to the side that shows far more robots than humans.
Jan
You won't see a $15 minimum wage in Sioux City or Tulsa (not that those aren't nice places).
My daughter makes about $20 to $22 an hour waiting tables while in high school. She does an excellent job and gets very generous tips.
We have all ready had the discussion around what will happen if she gets a base of $15.00 per hour, the tips will largely go away and the prices on the menu will have to go up accordingly. The end result she will get $15.00 an hour and her co worker that covers about 60% as many tables and still gets complaints log against her and makes about $11.00 an hour will also make $15.00 per hour.
It is yet again another way to average things out between producer and non-producing people.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LLr5o...
The more goods and services cost, the smaller the purchasing power of the consumer, meaning they have a lot less to donate to charities and causes, too. That's a negative no one ever talks about in relation to the economic impact of minimum wage hikes.
Clinton's new campaign has carried a populist tone throughout, but this speech -- before a ballroom full of mostly young, African American workers from across the country -- virtually echoed the language that the Service Employees International Union has used in its campaign for a $15 minimum wage. Along with the fast food workers who have been at the core of scattered protests over the past couple of years, Clinton's short speech called out home care workers and adjunct professors, who make up a substantial part of the SEIU's membership base and have joined in the call for higher wages.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/w...
There is no one on earth, esp not a politician, with whom I would agree 100%, with whom I could say "I support XYZ" and mean that I agree with every thing she/he ever said. So if thinking for ourselves and having our own ideas is "contradiction", I'm full of contradictions.
The metaphoric fence you speak of isn't real. People make that up for their own purposes.
I wonder if this is true. I imagine she's a high-achiever working in the field of politics. She knows you have to be the best at what you do, and that means listening to experts and maintaining a laundry list of problems people want to know she cares about. She no political capital to spare to tell people that most problems have to be solved by the person with the problem, not outside help. I imagine destroying free and productive people is the farthest thing from her mind. She wants to win and climb the rungs of power as you say. She wants to excel and do a "good job". She's a smart person and a good person, so she figures if she wins, it's good for her and good for the people she represents.
That's all pure guessing I my part. I do know that my non-random sample of people I know personally who've worked with her says she's brilliant and seems like a good person.
Ron Paul and now Rand Paul are my favorites. I get the idea they are not just coming up with a mix of things that sounds good to voter but are actually starting from a belief in limited gov't, a belief in not over-interpreting the Constitution.
When I take the isidewith test, which I do not trust but is fun to try, I come up almost tied between Rand Paul and Bernie Sanders. If there's anything to that test (and it may be pure crap), maybe there's not such a huge difference.
In any case, I see all politicians as the cool and personable people who will respond to lobbying to keep their jobs. Much of the apparent disagreement I believe is theatrics. I don't think that as much about Rand Paul. I think he would ideologically resist people lobbying for gov't to take action, which is MUCH better than Clinton who I believe would weigh my lobbying with others' lobbying.
The rule according to Secular Progressives is ...I have the right with no explanation to take all lyour rights without exception.
But as far as attending a fund raiser I've never had the requisite thousand a plate to to hob knob with the ruling class. Edited...make that never had the money to waste.