Why Unions Should be Prosecuted under the Sherman Act

Posted by overmanwarrior 12 years ago to History
11 comments | Share | Flag

The hypocrisy is obvious, and demands serious analysis. Labor unions in The United States are parasitic entities that only exist through coercive monopoly status. They are the cause of continuous tax increases and unmanaged local budgets. They don’t get paid based on the quality of their work, but from the fear they inspire into the political machine. They, unlike Microsoft or Alcoa are not the best in their fields of endeavor, they are simply willing to use force to achieve their desires—and that means they should be prosecuted to the furthest extent of the law with the same gusto that The Sherman Act was created and for the same reasons. The only reason they are not is because legislators are afraid to put such words into the public for fear that they will be examined by history for taking away the “rights” of such people. What those politicians don’t know because they lack a study of history is that such rights do not exist—except in the mind of Karl Marx, where the labor unions were born using tactics that have built the worst coercive monopolies in the history of mankind—all on the backs of the American taxpayer, while the innocent are hung like thieves by the murderers of capitalism—labor unions and their government conspirators with their coercive monopoly which involves the legal system.
SOURCE URL: http://overmanwarrior.wordpress.com/2013/04/17/labor-unions-should-be-prosecuted-under-the-sherman-act-the-largest-coercive-monopolies-in-the-world-go-unpunished/


Add Comment

FORMATTING HELP

All Comments Hide marked as read Mark all as read

  • Posted by ObjectiveAnalyst 12 years ago
    Joining a union is a constitutional right. Breaking up natural monopolies is the governments right. That's what they tell us. Of course, they are wrong.
    The system is, as the central planners wish it. The overall messages of your article lead me to recall the following admonition.
    "The man of system... is apt to be very wise in his own conceit; and is often so enamored with the supposed beauty of his own ideal plan of government, that he cannot suffer the smallest deviation from any part of it.... He seems to imagine that he can arrange the different members of a great society with as much ease as the hand arranges the different pieces upon a chess-board. He does not consider that the pieces upon the chess-board have no other principle of motion besides that which the hand impresses upon them; but that, in the great chess-board of human society, every single piece has a principle of motion of its own, altogether different from that which the legislature might chuse [sic] to impress upon it." Adam Smith
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by atoms 12 years ago
    I agree that unions are open wounds on our continent and I fully support the end of public service unions when we vote to do it. I object to any legislation banning private sector unions but wouldn't mind taking away any tax advantages they currently enjoy.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  

FORMATTING HELP

  • Comment hidden. Undo