Government Reeducation?

Posted by $ WillH 10 years, 11 months ago to Politics
14 comments | Share | Flag

I am not trying to reignite the debate on the virtues of personal liberty vs government coercion, the biggest thing I was focused on in this article are these two paragraphs. Read them aloud.

<quote>Last August, Labor Commissioner Brad Avakian told The Oregonian, their desire is to rehabilitate businesses like the one owned by the Christian couple.

“Everybody is entitled to their own beliefs, but that doesn’t mean that folks have the right to discriminate,” he told the newspaper. “The goal is never to shut down a business. The goal is to rehabilitate.” </quote>

Now, say that again using the word reeducate. No difference. I think he said a little more than he wanted to, let a little more slip than he was supposed to. I wonder what lengths he and those like him will go to in order to reeducate people. Perhaps a central reeducation facility would help them out.
SOURCE URL: http://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2014/01/21/christian-bakery-guilty-violating-civil-rights-lesbian-couple/?intcmp=latestnews


Add Comment

FORMATTING HELP

All Comments Hide marked as read Mark all as read

  • Comment hidden by post owner or admin, or due to low comment or member score. View Comment
  • Posted by flanap 10 years, 11 months ago
    My favorite part of the article is where it says (may be slightly paraphrased) "everyone has entitlement to their own beliefs, but that doesn't entitle them the right to discriminate."

    In other words, believe what you want as long as you do what we say. Classic...just classic communism. I think Ayn Rand would agree with this conclusion.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
    • Comment hidden by post owner or admin, or due to low comment or member score. View Comment
    • Posted by Robbie53024 10 years, 11 months ago
      Tyranny or dictatorship, but not communism. You are confusing the fact that all communist leaders were also dictators (or tyrants, if you prefer that word).
      Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by CircuitGuy 10 years, 11 months ago
    Apparently people misunderstood me. I said people who work for the gov't and want to rehabilitate people should stop doing that and instead start their own businesses or serve on boards of companies and focus on doing business right rather than using their gov't position to harass homophobes.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by Lucky 10 years, 11 months ago
    Opportunity for a leeching business running rehabilitation camps. There would be a few unemployed experts from Soviet Russia available.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by LionelHutz 10 years, 11 months ago
    The light bulb that has gone on in Oregon is "hey - if enforcing these anti-discrimination laws actually closes down businesses, we're going to lose tax revenue"
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
  • -1
    Posted by CircuitGuy 10 years, 11 months ago
    All those officials criticizing them should put their efforts to getting on the boards of other businesses and implementing gay friendly policies. It would be nice if they were friendly toward polyamory. I don't understand polyamory, and I'm pretty sure my wife and I will embarrass our kids when we say things like that.

    We could do more by going out in the marketplace and doing things well than trying to re-educate these Christians. Even if we can't, it's a free country. We can hold signs in front of their store. They can keep selling cakes only to heterosexuals. It doesn't hurt me a bit. They're not actually doing anything to gays. They're just making asses of themselves. The spirit of US Constitution protects their right to make asses of themselves.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  

FORMATTING HELP

  • Comment hidden. Undo