is is something called the San Diego Initiative that appears to be happening now. I lfound the Hudson Institute which led me to look at their reports on trade. This led me to the report on the San Diego Initiative. Penny Pritzker is mentioned in paragraph 1. I outlined it here.
This is a document by the Hudson Institute it is called the San Diego initiative. This is a reinforcement of Nafta plus additions. I am providing an outline of the report. Penny Pritzker is mentioned on paragraph 1 here is the URL http://www.hudson.org/files/publications... Pg 11 is telling on their next move and how they plan to reduce the political backlash against the left and the right by increasing the number of contributors to both political parties. They also have a goal to increase the number of illegals (they use another term) and move law enforcement inland, lower regs and costs for trade across borders and increase globalization. Actually it says page 9 on the page but pg 11 on the reader. The following was on page 13 of the reader.it's not just Federal Government they want but state governments. Since U.S. states can amend their state constitutions, they have become frequent innovators within the United States system affecting what services are delivered and how (Katz 2003).When changes in trade flows affect jobs and economies, state, provincial and municipal leaders are often the first to react to these changes. This is one reason why U.S. states have taken the lead inreaching out to neighboring Canadian and Mexican jurisdictions to mitigate problems and leverage local advantages.Add all of these subnational governments together, and there are 97 governments with an important role in the governance of North American integration. It is not necessary to invent new institutions to improve public support for efforts .All three must be convinced that moving ahead as a block is preferable to going it alone and political leaders must once again be willing to concede national sovereignty in favor of a North American community. pg 22 We must also be realistic, recognizing that here are significant differences among the three. They want to stop duplicate testing in each country and get private labs to do the testing. Canada and Mexicodo nothave the same interests (except to preserve preferred access to the US market) and the US as the biggest market by far, has its own set of interests
and sensitivities.For this reason we propose a staged approach, beginning with sectors where there is already a high degree of market and product integration including autos, aerospace and meat Other areas will be more problematic. In government procurement, temp Other areas will be more problematic. In government procurement, temporary entry of workers, and intellectual property protection, our interests are not aligned and we are often competitors for investment from third markets. Nevertheless, the habit of consultation and the institutional and political underpinnings supporting this cooperation will lay the groundwork for future harmonization of regional trade. pg 23 Officials in all three countries have made concerted efforts to try to move security obligations away from the borders, and to focus on key trade corridors where the majority of cargo moves. If these efforts are successful,
the border of the future will serve as a data capture location supported by enforcement activity throughout the three countries. I say yeah bullshit. There would be no checks.hen it goes into DNA and fingerprint databases. There are 50 pages to this document. The government pays for this Hudson Institute.One claim in this document is to support TPP etc to combat China uneven trade leverage. Page 27 talks about the need to divorce citizenship from the right to work. It says so much more my head is exploding. More killer facts we have trade deficits with Canada and Mexico but the want more cheap labor. They also reccomended circumventing laws by using regulations to bypass Congress. I realize Hudson Institute is only one member of the Bilderberg but I found it interesting that Bilderberg claims it has nothing to do with policy making.