Galt's Gulch

Add Comment

FORMATTING HELP

All Comments Hide marked as read Mark all as read

    -
  • Posted by Eudaimonia 10 years, 11 months ago
    The UK Daily Mirror is a left wing rag.

    UKIP, The British version of the US Tea Party, in on the ascension in the UK, and it has the Left there crapping its pants.

    Just like in the US, any way a leftist rag can pull an Alinsky on its opposition, it will.

    A "councillor" is a local official, not a member of Parliament, and certainly not the party Leadership.

    Here's the real story:
    Some local bureaucrat leaves the Tories over the Tories' support of Gay Marriage
    As a way to tell the Tories to "Piss Off", he joins UKIP.
    He then spouts off something which the Labour Party finds offensive.
    The UK Daily Mirror jumps on it and tries to smear all of UKIP with the association.

    Typical.

    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
      -
    • Posted by $ Snezzy 10 years, 11 months ago
      Sounds to me like a Trojan Horse. Wouldn't be surprised if the Mirror put him up to it, or even if someone in Labour paid him to join UKIP and be his usual self. He'd not even know where the money came from.

      You always know when someone like Herman Cain, or the Tea Party, or UKIP comes along, there will be baseless accusations. US Conservative blacks always get hit with sex-scandal stories. The Tea Party is accused of racism and violence. The UKIP finds it's painted as religious nutters.

      What is the correct way to defend oneself against ridicule or against an "Alinsky" attack?
      Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
      • Posted by JossAmbrose 10 years, 11 months ago
        The correct way to defend oneself? Hit the cudgel wielding, bile spitting horde with cold, hard, logical facts. Mind you, they only hear what they want to hear, so it's a lot like throwing pearls before swine.
        Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ Stormi 10 years, 11 months ago
    Why must religion always be taken to the point of, "God will get you for that" extremism? This poor guy better think, the Brits have put Muslims in control of the TV religious reporting. Does he not see a problem there/ We spied on them going back to Clinton and Echelon, and now the current scandal with spying on everyone. Does he ever consider that the US uses HAMP (Hurricane Arosol and Microphisics Project)? Christie might look into that one. They also use HAARP (High Frequency Active Auroral Research Project), which they have bragged changed weather in the Middle East to aid soldiers. God helps those who help themselves? Maybe he had better dig a little deeper than divine intervention, and look for international scoundrels. Which brings up, did anyone else hear Christie now has links to the Rockefellers?
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ stargeezer 10 years, 11 months ago
    And I'll take odds on this fool thinking that Christians believing in God by faith are foolish mystics. The only thing more funny that a liberal is what falls out of their mouth.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  

FORMATTING HELP

  • Comment hidden. Undo