'Religion vrs Reason in the mind of a Supreme Court Justice.'
Far worse than the mind of the Justice is the religious belief -the new age religion of intolerance and carbon change- of the interviewer.

'This article makes a serious point with a touch of humor. '
This article makes no serious point and has no humor but demonstrates the stupidity and biases of the writer.

But only Salon would try to tie Scalia's personal belief, if actual, to ACW.

No proof has ever been offered as to whether the universe was created or has existed eternally. In the absence of proof only one's emotions can possibly be a guide to dealing with the evidence of the senses. Despite the writer's incredible plundering of Roget's thesaurus, he/she/it offers nothing but Saul Alinsky's rule number 5. Insufficient evidence to support the conclusion.

So fundamental theists are pedophiles. Very interesting. What's especially funny is that the author of this piece is questioning the sanity of one of our Suprme Court Justices.

Pot, meet kettle...