The Fountainhead
We found "The Fountainhead" on iTunes and watched it last night. Wow (Long Pause for Effect) what a movie. This sure took a chapter out of my working life only I never had the enjoyment of blowing anything up after someone defaced my work or stole the credit. Did Ayn Rand ever have an ability to clearly see reality for what it was.
I always thought it was to accommodate the loud volumes one experiences when in a movie theater, but that doesn't make sense given the much longer history of movies in the movie theaters. Or, have they cranked up the volume in our "modern" era? But also, the network series productions are guilty of this as well. So it isn't just a theater thing.
I think it is the fault of the sound engineers. Notice that when the kissing/slurping/chew face thing has to happen it is quite loud, but when some dialogue occurs you can hardly hear it.
Many a production is guilty of this, and it should not attributed to certain performers. But I find Russel Crowe really guilty of this. I could hardly sit through the remake of 3:10 to Yuma because of this. Imagine that - having to turn on subtitles on an English speaking film so that you can follow the dialogue. Jeez.
On the third hand, I HATE IT when the 'background music' becomes Foreground Music and isn't faded down when the actors begin to speak.
Producers or directors might think it's just SO cool or 'mood-setting,' but it just makes it impossible to hear a lot of the dialogue.
But the background music on a LOT of all-English (American-English)-speaking shows does the same thing.
It's as if nobody ever takes 'one last listen' before saying "Print!"... or whatever they say now... :)
A good piece of news: my heavily liberal/socialist-influenced high school daughter is assigned "Anthem" for her summer intro to her Senior English class. This was a shock! Think I will pull out my recently acquired copy and try to engage some conversation.
You might like to have a look at the course guide to see how they're expecting the book to be treated.
For all you know, they might be looking to smear the book and Ayn Rand, and make your daughter even more socialist.
Something which helped me was studying the research of Geert Hofstede, who came up with the idea of "cultural dimensions" - stereotypes which are supported by evidence. The main dimensions are Power Distance, Individualism, Uncertainty avoidance, Masculinity, and Long Term Orientation.
Where that applies in this discussion is with individuality, a dimension in which countries like the USA scores highest in the world. Other countries, such as South Korea and Saudi Arabia, score very low.
http://geert-hofstede.com/united-states....
Lecturers like your daughter had would be better off in one of these other countries.
I say this because that is exactly what Anthem provided me as a pre-teenager. And gee, without government mandated counselors.
I was very young and looking for a verification of what I was so early formulating as a framework of thought that could provide an operable basis for life.
Anthem, and the other major pieces of Ayn Rand's work - and the experiences of sitting alone on my ten-speed on the Concord Bridge in Massachusetts are intensely integral to my life.
I sat there on Concord Bridge trying to understand why certain people would resist significant and apparently overwhelming forces at the risk of their very lives.
I directly struggled with the immediately evident understanding that these individuals chose to possibly- and likely - die as a result of "resisting the king" than to live with a life arbitrarily determined by others than themselves.
What "belief system" is worth more than life itself if it comes down to it? This is a huge visceral question for which many have given their lives as the very testimonial answer to the question.
It is the "how did they know" question that haunts me the most about when it comes time to expend your utmost - as an individual - in the name of that freedom - and give it all.
Would that supposed to be symbolic of passion?
That's an unforgettable B/W sight that repeatedly floats up from old dino's memory banks.
Gave you the 3 for showing me up.
Take that, smarty pants.
ISBN 1-58567-406-0. OCLC 56413971
Turn to Page 71
To quote: Ayn rand "disliked the movie from beginning to end", and complained about its editing, acting and other elements.
Two different art forms - two different narrative conventions must be maintained.
I was very impressed and gave it a full five stars.
Then within a week I was channel surfing and found it playing on Turner.
I was all like "What?!?"
Said "Yep, I want to see that."
Went straight to Netflix but found it is glitching any movie I try to write in to order right now.
I will get around to seeing that flick soon one way or the other.
Thanks.
Just to look at two ends of the spectrum; Hannibal Lecter and Einstein. Both were considered to have Genius IQ's but I personally would only consider Einstein to be intelligent.
Many of the looters are intelligent, but they have no ethics or moral compass.
going, here, imho. . intelligence carries in it the stuff
of its own destruction, as well. . besides the potential
to exploit others, there is the potential to "innocently"
abuse yourself in a number of ways -- through
driving your body too hard, or experimenting with
drugs or adrenaline. . I bet that the shrinks have
a whole "science" in this area.
thanks for the elucidation!!! -- j, former mensa
.
I think the reason I preferred it, is that it is a more personal novel than AS was. Atlas Shrugged was not as personal, the novel's focus shifted among a group of protagonists, Hank, Francisco, Dagny, John Gault. It was also focused more on the society and its decay.
The Fountainhead was more focused on one man and his insistence on being true to himself despite societies efforts to make him conform.
I think that focus is why it strikes a more intense chord with the individual.
First came "Anthem", a simple book that raised the issues.
Then "We the Living" showed how these issues affect real lives.
"The Fountainhead" gave us the morality of a Perfect Man,
Finally "Atlas Shrugged" answered the inevitable question: 'What then must we do?'
I think "Anthem" was my favorite (though Galt's speech was literally, physically. thrilling for me!) But "The Fountainhead" has been the most useful.
My sister wears a bracelet with the letters "WWJD".
I've always wanted one that said "WWRD" to remind me of the many times I've asked myself "What would Roark do?!"
AR was truly one of the greatest minds in history.
how did Roark sacrifice his integrity?
If Roark is like a diety to you, I think you've missed some important concepts in the book, sunjock. So I assume you mean this in hyperbole :)
So The Fountainhead is not for me.
Jan
Jan, did not succeed
But I agree it is annoying as hell watching her struggle against herself and how she tries to hurt others. Toohey to me is worth reading the book for-alone. Evilest character I've read that was not a monster.
When you did not immediately respond to cut me down to size for dissing your fave, I felt lonely and ignored! And no, of course I have never known anyone like that. Ever. (Ahem.)
I listen to other people talk about the book, which means that I do not have to become personally involved in the characters.
Interesting thread - and useful to me (because I get to be a total parasite and listen to what everyone else says without contributing.)
Jan, making trouble today (for no good reason)
Excellent, Grasshopper! You Are Aware!
:)