- Hot
- New
- Categories...
- Producer's Lounge
- Producer's Vault
- The Gulch: Live! (New)
- Ask the Gulch!
- Going Galt
- Books
- Business
- Classifieds
- Culture
- Economics
- Education
- Entertainment
- Government
- History
- Humor
- Legislation
- Movies
- News
- Philosophy
- Pics
- Politics
- Science
- Technology
- Video
- The Gulch: Best of
- The Gulch: Bugs
- The Gulch: Feature Requests
- The Gulch: Featured Producers
- The Gulch: General
- The Gulch: Introductions
- The Gulch: Local
- The Gulch: Promotions
- Marketplace
- Members
- Store
- More...
Thank you for this presentation. It was quite informative. I am pleased to find I am not the only one that can't immediately recall every name. Isn't it strange and frustrating when you cannot recall a name like Joseph Swan on demand, but later it comes out of your mouth naturally with out trying? :) The story of Edison and Swan is quite interesting. http://www.cio.com/article/2441341/consu... I think Edison deserves the credit though, because while he didn't "invent" the first light-bulb, what he did invent was the first practical light-bulb. This was the real benefit and creation of value.
It was quite apparent and put a fine point on the matter when at the end you had to turn on the lights!
Regards,
O.A.
I agree Edison deserves credit from an historical point of view. From a legal point of view they did not invent the same thing. Patents are setup so that each person who contributes to advancing the art has a property right. It is not a winner takes all situation. Something the critics of patents ignore or do not understand.