I recognized Obama as a wannabe dictator from the first time I heard him. I've read Eric Hoffers "The True Believer - A Study of Mass Movements" and when I heard the words "Hope and Change" come out of Obama's mouth I remembered Hoffer warning that those are the words that presage an oppressive authoritarian state.
My discomfort comes from studying the Insurrection Act, first passed in 1807, and still in effect. This law gives the President sole power to declare a state to be "insurrectionist", meaning that he judges that the residents of a state are being denied the full exercise of their constitutional rights, and the governor is either unable or unwilling to correct the situation. Once he makes that declaration, he can institute martial law in that state (or states). Congress does not have to consent to this declaration or action, and takes precedence over Posse Comitatus.
All it would take is one such state, and I have no doubt that would enable Obama to call for a hold on elections "until the crisis is resolved."
This is what I also see happen. The urban areas will be the first to be contained, then they will start to branch out. They will come to my home and tell me the cattle I raise will become the states and I am to meet production quotes to feed the urban concentration camps and I am to forfeit my firearms. Their end game. I hope I have enough land to hide weapons that they can't find where I finish my shrugging by leaving them nothing and hopefully find a way further way. Love to stay for fight that will be however got to get my family to an even safer place.
The Left has perfected the art of presenting two choices as if they were the only two possible. Either we are going to get a new Gestapo which will feature brownshirts
"The first thing he[Goering] did was to prohibit regular uniformed police from interfering with Nazi Brownshirts out in the streets. This meant that innocent German citizens had no one to turn to as they were being beaten up by rowdy young storm troopers drunk with their newfound power and quite often drunk on beer. These young Nazi toughs took full advantage of police leniency to loot shops at will and terrorize Jews or anyone else unfortunate enough to be caught in the wrong place at the wrong time." http://www.historyplace.com/worldwar2/tr...
or or all nationalized police will have to swear an allegiance to BHO which is just two sides of the same coin. Advocating for Individual Rights will be deemed terrorism requiring summary execution.
I continue to ask what the end game is? If the government continues to take over everything then the source i.e. monies needed to pay their people will disappear and of course all of the makers of products and growers of food will disappear, and then they will have nothing. In the event that you have not read or heard Ayn Rand last lecture "sanction of the victims" I suggest you acquaint your self with it. It appears to me that under the 0 leadership of the government the nation is declining much faster than imaginable. Most importantly the economy is going down the toilet.
The next question is: What tools will the American people put up with in order for that end game to be achieved?
For example: If the end game is 'a socialist dictatorship under Obama', the tool that is just barely acceptable to the USA public might be 'extension of a presidential term due to warfare or disaster within the Continental US'.
Assessing what the end game is and what people will tolerate gives us an idea of the theater of operations.
people here will come up[ with all sorts of ideas of how things can be stopped, but i do not think so. the wheels were set in motion a long time ago, my proof of that statement is referencing all of what Ayn Rand wrote starting in the 1930's. as we have seen all of it has come to pass and unfortunately stay. 0 just happens to be the worst of the lot to hold the office of president and he has a grudge because of his heritage. that is on display daily.
I remember WAAAaay back in 2006, when Obama started running for president doing a lot of personal research into his "known" writings, associates, Michelle's writing and associations, and their associates writings.
I came to the conclusion that Obama was a "Hitler" wannabe. I was called crazy.
Well, if I am not mistaken didn't Adolf Hitler have the "Brown Shirts" that were the National Police?
I am seeing far too many parallels between Hitler and Obama for my own personal comfort.
and to me I think the most disturbing thing is that there are so many people Hailing him as the second coming. Same thing the German people did when Hitler had his rise to power.
Adolf Hitler's rise to power began in Germany in September 1919 when Hitler joined the political party known as the Deutsche Arbeiterpartei. So do not think that the rise to ultimate power happens overnight.
1919 until his defeat in 1945 was a total of 26 years.
Obama is only 6 years in. Obama is also a VERY, VERY power hungry ambitious person. 2016 is not far off, and there is a lot yet to unfold between now and Nov, 2016.
I have said for the last 2 years, Obama is not going to give up his power so easily...especially when so many are still fawning all over him as a glorious leader. Much the same as the majority in Baltimore, who have had Democratic Liberal Leadership for over 50 years, and yet they still for some reason think Conservatives are to blame for their problems.
you should read "ominous parallels, the end of freedom in America" by leonard peikoff. it was first published in 1982. it shows the parallel of Germany leading up to hitler and what has bee going on in the usa since the late 50's and early 60's.
I've long been thinking along these same lines. If it were not for the socialist ideology embraced by the so-called mainstream media, by now Obama would be impeached for treason on several levels and Presi-boob Joe Biden would be getting his hands burned for groping the Middle East.
In "The Fountainhead", Steven Mallory talked a- bout some kind of "beast" that was determined to trample all over the rights of man, and would not be persuaded by reason to stop. Well, we have to fight, and let's hope that enough of the American people have not become that beast.
Wow. Even though it seems that everything has been said already, it is absolutely stunning to watch it all unfold within a lifetime and despite all that has been said.
Why, with all the history to guide humanity, does this all have to happen? Even to this day, excellent books and movies are coming out (just watched The Book Thief) about life under Nazism, under the Bolsheviks, or under Mao. Why is there this blatant blind spot in the public mindset to recognize what is happening? The best answer I have read to date is in Leonard Peikoff's "The Ominous Parallels". Another gem from 1957.
At the core of this is the penchant for way too many minds to be able to deny themselves that A is A. To not recognize a truth as a truth and to engage in such torturous rationalizations to have it both ways. I'd like to say it is unbelievable, but that would be the same denial of a truth staring us in the face.
With each passing day, I see more and more over-reach by our government and less desire from our legislative branch to do anything about it. I consider any of these with the ability to do something, yet not willing to do anything about this just as culpable as our POTUS is.
In 1979 there were four federal police forces. One no longer exists now I believe there closer to 40 and the world asks "What happened to the USA it's such a fascist police state anymore. and people who moved to the US from Russia et. al. are now moving again to Mexico saying, "Starting to remind me of the Soviet Union.
There is a difference between cooperating in investigations and creating a Protective Echelon - a Directorate of Internal State Security. And they do not hold allegience to the Constitution as does the military.
Sure you want to vote Government Party - either of there four choices??
And why would anyone think that federal police would be any better? Google "diesel therapy" some time. Federal authorities have been doing it for years.
My discomfort comes from studying the Insurrection Act, first passed in 1807, and still in effect. This law gives the President sole power to declare a state to be "insurrectionist", meaning that he judges that the residents of a state are being denied the full exercise of their constitutional rights, and the governor is either unable or unwilling to correct the situation. Once he makes that declaration, he can institute martial law in that state (or states). Congress does not have to consent to this declaration or action, and takes precedence over Posse Comitatus.
All it would take is one such state, and I have no doubt that would enable Obama to call for a hold on elections "until the crisis is resolved."
Jan
"The first thing he[Goering] did was to prohibit regular uniformed police from interfering with Nazi Brownshirts out in the streets. This meant that innocent German citizens had no one to turn to as they were being beaten up by rowdy young storm troopers drunk with their newfound power and quite often drunk on beer. These young Nazi toughs took full advantage of police leniency to loot shops at will and terrorize Jews or anyone else unfortunate enough to be caught in the wrong place at the wrong time."
http://www.historyplace.com/worldwar2/tr...
or or all nationalized police will have to swear an allegiance to BHO which is just two sides of the same coin.
Advocating for Individual Rights will be deemed terrorism requiring summary execution.
.
The next question is: What tools will the American people put up with in order for that end game to be achieved?
For example: If the end game is 'a socialist dictatorship under Obama', the tool that is just barely acceptable to the USA public might be 'extension of a presidential term due to warfare or disaster within the Continental US'.
Assessing what the end game is and what people will tolerate gives us an idea of the theater of operations.
Jan
people here will come up[ with all sorts of ideas of how things can be stopped, but i do not think so. the wheels were set in motion a long time ago, my proof of that statement is referencing all of what Ayn Rand wrote starting in the 1930's. as we have seen all of it has come to pass and unfortunately stay. 0 just happens to be the worst of the lot to hold the office of president and he has a grudge because of his heritage. that is on display daily.
On even days I agree with you; on odd days I am more optimistic.
It is May 4th. I agree with you.
Jan
Jan, on May 5th (but then...how do you know when I will read your messages?)
The American Socialist Republic.
"To each according to his need -- or else!"
I came to the conclusion that Obama was a "Hitler" wannabe. I was called crazy.
Well, if I am not mistaken didn't Adolf Hitler have the "Brown Shirts" that were the National Police?
I am seeing far too many parallels between Hitler and Obama for my own personal comfort.
and to me I think the most disturbing thing is that there are so many people Hailing him as the second coming. Same thing the German people did when Hitler had his rise to power.
Adolf Hitler's rise to power began in Germany in September 1919 when Hitler joined the political party known as the Deutsche Arbeiterpartei. So do not think that the rise to ultimate power happens overnight.
1919 until his defeat in 1945 was a total of 26 years.
Obama is only 6 years in. Obama is also a VERY, VERY power hungry ambitious person. 2016 is not far off, and there is a lot yet to unfold between now and Nov, 2016.
I have said for the last 2 years, Obama is not going to give up his power so easily...especially when so many are still fawning all over him as a glorious leader. Much the same as the majority in Baltimore, who have had Democratic Liberal Leadership for over 50 years, and yet they still for some reason think Conservatives are to blame for their problems.
If it were not for the socialist ideology embraced by the so-called mainstream media, by now Obama would be impeached for treason on several levels and Presi-boob Joe Biden would be getting his hands burned for groping the Middle East.
bout some kind of "beast" that was determined to
trample all over the rights of man, and would not
be persuaded by reason to stop. Well, we have to
fight, and let's hope that enough of the American
people have not become that beast.
Why, with all the history to guide humanity, does this all have to happen? Even to this day, excellent books and movies are coming out (just watched The Book Thief) about life under Nazism, under the Bolsheviks, or under Mao. Why is there this blatant blind spot in the public mindset to recognize what is happening? The best answer I have read to date is in Leonard Peikoff's "The Ominous Parallels". Another gem from 1957.
At the core of this is the penchant for way too many minds to be able to deny themselves that A is A. To not recognize a truth as a truth and to engage in such torturous rationalizations to have it both ways. I'd like to say it is unbelievable, but that would be the same denial of a truth staring us in the face.
There is a difference between cooperating in investigations and creating a Protective Echelon - a Directorate of Internal State Security. And they do not hold allegience to the Constitution as does the military.
Sure you want to vote Government Party - either of there four choices??
MMF to you comrade. I do not serve the party.
.
.
floating around than I ever imagined. -- j
.