- Hot
- New
- Categories...
- Producer's Lounge
- Producer's Vault
- The Gulch: Live! (New)
- Ask the Gulch!
- Going Galt
- Books
- Business
- Classifieds
- Culture
- Economics
- Education
- Entertainment
- Government
- History
- Humor
- Legislation
- Movies
- News
- Philosophy
- Pics
- Politics
- Science
- Technology
- Video
- The Gulch: Best of
- The Gulch: Bugs
- The Gulch: Feature Requests
- The Gulch: Featured Producers
- The Gulch: General
- The Gulch: Introductions
- The Gulch: Local
- The Gulch: Promotions
- Marketplace
- Members
- Store
- More...
So why do no "Global Warming" articles discuss the benefits?
Actually why are so few people talking about how the increased CO2 is a boon to vegitation ant the entire planet is getting greener?
Of course, if you follow solar cycles, we are likely to be getting cooler in the next couple decades -- which will be a real problem (famine, disease, people freezing because the can't afford energy which 'necessarily skyrocketed'.)
You got it.
Jan
Oops, that would be free market capitalism. No, that won't be allowed to happen in Kalifornia.
Whoa! Someone could make a pron flick about that.
I'm suddenly reminded of that Flesh Gordon flick that a naughty dino saw back during the 70s.
Now I'm thinking of that Voyage To The Bottom of the Sea flick about the sky catching on fire. Forgot the reason but I smell a smoking remake
with global warming as the PC theme.
Think I need to go before my ancient mind triggers another hot memory..
Jan
It's comments like these that convince me that Savage is right: Liberalism IS a mental disorder.
Speaking of congregation in small areas, it seems that liberals seem to infest the urban areas and I think THAT is the CO2 pollution that is contributing to global warming.
But that's a very very small part of the surface of the earth and doesn't really affect the temperature of the planet as a whole.
All in the name of the eco-nut-invented phony emergency of the week.
Now you'll all know it when you see it.
Unlike the so-called environmental threats, though, these EPA policies do pose a grave threat to the continued existence of capitalism, and with it civilization. That's the real goal: these are the people who consider Man a "cancer upon the earth." See http://green-agenda.com. They ought to begin by killing themselves.
Are you sure that you do not mean 'Hydrogen Sulfide' and not 'CO2'? It seems to me more apt for their liberal output.
I agree with WilliamShipley. The sun produces X amount of heat radiation into our environment. It will be moved around and more evenly distributed by nature if it were not captured by the asphalt jungle producing hot spots, but the total amount of energy is unchanged. Also it has been established that many of the measuring stations have been corrupted by the development of urban areas locally. Check out this link for a prime example.. http://wattsupwiththat.com/2009/06/05/a-...
Respectfully,
O.A.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VBdSqk78...
In any case, I caught them red-handed back in 2009. "I've just completed Mike's Nature trick...to hide the decline."
the planet hasn't warmed for 3000 years not the past 20. but it is now cooling.