Cops Have Killed Every 8 Hours in 2015, Sending At Least Three People to Early Graves Per Day

Posted by Zenphamy 9 years, 9 months ago to Government
28 comments | Share | Flag

So it looks like America's police force is starting out for a real bang-up year;
"As of February 15, only a month and a half into 2015, there has been at least 136 individuals killed by police in the United States since the first of the year.

The frighteningly high number averages out to three killed per day, or someone killed every eight hours. While there is no government-run database, Killed By Police has taken it upon themselves to keep track, and are doing a fantastic job thus far."

And;

Unofficially, it seems that American police kill more than all of the first world nations’ police departments combined!

That’s not the only mind-blowing perspective either. So far this year all cop killers have been other cops. This year the police seem to be far more likely to die as a result of police brutality than at the hand of a violent suspect."
SOURCE URL: http://thefreethoughtproject.com/cops-killed-8-hours-2015-early-graves-day/#mWhP5tlPxCL6y8Dh.99


Add Comment

FORMATTING HELP

All Comments Hide marked as read Mark all as read

  • Posted by Mamaemma 9 years, 9 months ago
    What I found very interesting about this article was my reaction to it. I found myself questioning a lot, and I realized that I just didn't like reading this and didn't want to believe it. Interesting how the desire to not look at reality can sneak in.
    I'm not saying I'm not still skeptical, but I was a lot more suspicious of this article than I would be of one saying something with which I heartily agree.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by j_IR1776wg 9 years, 9 months ago
    Although I count myself among those fearful of our police becoming a Gestapo fulfilling Obama's dictatorial dreams, I would have preferred the author compare this period to the U.S. for the last two to three years and detail the circumstances of the 136 incidents. Comparison with other countries is meaningless.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
    • Posted by iroseland 9 years, 9 months ago
      actually, they provide a link..

      http://killedbypolice.net/

      Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?
      Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
      • Posted by j_IR1776wg 9 years, 9 months ago
        Thank you very much. I read the first 11 files. 8 involved civilian males with guns, 2 had knives, and 1 was described a "violent, mentally-disturbed male". This post made it sound as if the police are engaged in an execution campaign. Demonizing all police and introducing the Brownshirts is the way Hitler gained total control over the civilians in Germany, and, how the Marxists are trying to help Obama to do the same thing in America.
        Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by IIGeo2 9 years, 9 months ago
    Sense of prportion is mitigated by a need to end things quickly, the longer you linger with an issue the more likely you are to draw a crowd. The larger the crown the increased chances of being distraction. Distrctions create oppurtunities, for escape, for officer assaults, for unwarrented conflict. So lets address the issue of what cause a perceived over reaction and that is the perceived threat to ones life? But we gave them a gun some may say and I say exactly! Now If you want to really deal with this we need two cops per squad car. Not one by himself while waiting for backup BUT two officers with two perspectives. So next this is why we all need to carry guns? what I would reccomend is either going for a ride along with an officer which most community police programs sponsor or doing some time as a reserve deputy or an Aux Police Officer (IN NYC they are Unarmed) this wil give you a different perspective.

    The real question is does a person suspected of commiting a crime have a civil right to resist arrest? The answer is no. Can we solve this issue here in the Gulch? Again the answer is probably no. So assuming that most cops go to work with the same thoughts as we do "what are we going to do tonight after work?" I would say that they really have the same goals as us. But apples to apples my life is not the same as a Police Officers and I can't make judgements. But I do know that cooperation of a criminal suspect goes along way towards peaceful resolution. In the days of everyone wants to know everything about everyone I think to much information may be one of the issues.

    The final question is are we willing to grant the police a reprieve from a duty to act. meaning if he feels his life could be threatened that they have the option of leaving for the sake of self preservation? On the videos above neither cop pulled a weapon and both tried to verbally control a subject. The first was a loud mouth simply refusing to play by the rules. The second became an agressor and without provocation murdered a man in cold blood.
    Now the unitended lesson that we can take away from the video is that fear and situation have a big influeance on how we react. I am willing to bet that the officers who gave his life in the line of duty had NEVER once pulled his gun on a person and that the decision to do so caused him great stress which caused a severe lack of accuracy which cost him his life. Which brings us back to the first question of how are they trained? train for this type of violance and when they follow the training we crucify them. Fail to train for this type of violance and we bury them.

    Am I passionate about this? Yes. Why because Civil societies require all of us to do our share. Work hard, create and respect others rights to engage or not engage in the same activities. Respect the basic rules of society. This is the Gulch way.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by IIGeo2 9 years, 9 months ago
    Now watch this video
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gwYBshAS...

    This can easily become this "Warning this is graphic"

    He died while trying to talk him down.
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qoI4G1fW...

    The point of this is our law enforcement is literally toyed with on a daily basis and each situation is literally a poetntial life and death issue, Both traffic stops both displayed hostile intent. Both could have been avoided with simply being compliant.

    My prayers for the family of the slain officers who fied for the rights of people to have the free speach to slander our Peace Officers, the statistics dont quite cover it and when you talk about training seconds count when confronted by this type of aggression.

    Now in each case a weapon was involved 90% of the subjects in the European nations don't make it back to the police station with a pulse and having seen this rightfully so.

    The rare occasion was the nut job in Norway who went on a murderous rampage, I gbet the sores of families where he cold bloodedly killed their loved ones would have preffered he was killed on the spot, instead he will be released in 20 years.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
    • Posted by dbhalling 9 years, 9 months ago
      An illegal arrest, which happens all the time, is illegal. Police cannot and do not have immunity and they work for us. So yes there are many times when it is legal to resist arrest.
      Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
      • Posted by IIGeo2 9 years, 9 months ago
        That is what the courts are for and if proven to have been illegal there is a system to address this. But what are the amounts of illegal arrest that occur versus the amounts of legal arrest? Now lets take this a step further there is a difference between wrongfully arrested and oopps I forgot to dash the I and cross the T on the arrest of a known or highly suspected drug dealer. But if you can show me that it is legal to resist arrest in any state or federal law I would appreciate that, so I can educate myself. And I do agree they work for us, and because they do work for us, I chose to treat them with respect and I chose to cooperate, because right will always be right.

        I assume as a given that all public servants do what they do out of a genuine desire to serve. Not everyone can do this and if I recall correctly it is not easy to get a Government Top Secret Security clearance unless, you are Honorable, clean living and have integirty that is beyond questioning. Because of the world we live in they also consider your family influences as well as your friends. So again I would say "Thank You" to you because, its not only the servicemen and women that serve but the sacrifice of thier family members as well that must be applauded. So again I say thank you. But this issue is far to complex to give it a blanket statement and each situation is very different. So again I say thank you for the chance to see things from a different perspective and agreethat I disagree about the premise of the initial argument as it seems unbalanced. So I oppined with a different perspective in the hopes that we avoid the cop bashing which contributes to their fear of a public they swore to protect even when they seem to be hated for doing just that. So again thank you for your comments.
        Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
        • Posted by dbhalling 9 years, 9 months ago
          Wrong, you do not give up your right to self defense, and police in fact should be more highly scrutinized, but the laws have been stacked against the people That is what the Constitution is for.
          Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
          • Posted by IIGeo2 9 years, 9 months ago
            I agree with you the right of self defense is just that a right. So does a drug dealer have the right to sell drugs? Does a drunk driver have the right to kill someone while he is driving? The answer is no? does a cop have the right to defend himself as well? Keeping in mind that as a population we pay them to do just that and by an oath they state that they will to the best of their abilities fairly enforce the law? Now according to you the answer seems to be "no" and I respect that. So I propose that Police be freed from a duty to act if they feel that any such actions could , would or perceived by the less then reasonable to place him/her either in harms way, criminal or financial liability. Now keep in mind is it the Cop we have a problem with or the elected representatives who never seem to stop writting unenforceable laws statutes and outline police policy and procedure.

            So we must actually define self defense and the circumstance in which it it applies?
            Then define when something is not self defense?

            I have reserached the right to resist arrest and still have had no luck finding a clause, law, statute or preseidence. So do we suggest general insurection or better yet anarchy under the sovereign citizens movement? but as I believe the US Consitution is law of the land, most of us at one point or another took an Oath to defend it. That I am aware there wasn't a "until such date clause in the various oaths I have taken." So again I thank you and you have my +1, not because I agree with you its because I believe that you have the right to disagree with me.

            Will I respond to you again? probaly not but I respect your rights and I appreciate your being a member of "Galt's Gulch"
            Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
            • Posted by dbhalling 9 years, 9 months ago
              The problem is that the Police ignore the Constitution and there are no consequences. We all cheer when they catch the bad guys by ignore search warrants or when the rough the bad guy up. And that has transferred to real life. See the Gibson Guitar Raid, see the IRS, we are not a nation of laws, we are a nation in a cold civil war where the "law" is just a political weapon. In that situation the police are some of the most dangerous people in the world.
              Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
        • Posted by 9 years, 9 months ago
          1 to 2 years after the event to get into court is not remedy. Holding the cop immediately accountable is.
          Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
          • Posted by IIGeo2 9 years, 9 months ago
            I would agree if this was also the case for the criminal as well but how many times do we see convictions overturned for various reasons. And I know some who strayed and their punishment was just as severe. Google any agency and trust betrayed. You will see that in fact there is accountability. And unlike the average criminal who is victimized there is usually a civil suit filed and the victim although not made whole has something.

            For the record abuse of power is just that ABUSE and it should not be tolerated. I have known Federal employees terminated for much less, whats happening now is just a sign of the current administration.
            Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
            • Posted by 9 years, 9 months ago
              I can understand your defenses in the ideal, but in the application, particularly in today's world, I find big problems and tremendous damage to our ideas of freedom and natural rights. The Founders, amazingly had a pretty sound understanding of human behavior when given power over others and tried the best to provide us with a structure of government that would account for that. One of the basics of their understanding and beliefs was the simple, yet tremendously important statement that 'Rather 10 guilty men go free than one innocent man be punished.' We've permitted the destruction of that ideal and we're paying the price for that laxness now, just as the Founders warned us.

              As to the danger that police allegedly face on a daily basis. Cops and even fire fighters don't even rank in the top 10 of most dangerous jobs in the US. And for the ability to hold them accountable, it simply doesn't exist in the real world. I would much prefer that anyone with power over my life be held to a pretty strong and strict scrutiny when they're on duty. If you want that power, you take the scrutiny and if you pull your gun too quick or wrongly, you go to jail--you don't get to sit behind a desk at full pay for two or three weeks. You sit in a jail cell as any citizen would have to.

              Civil court just doesn't do it for me, For a cop to arrive at that court, he's taken a life or at least abused his power in a way that damaged another human and a civil judgement that the cop will never pay nor have the means to pay in the future means nothing to the abused or to the family of the killed.

              At least today there are sources that are beginning to document as the referenced site and as the groups that film police on duty the abuses and criminalities to the point that some citizens are beginning to open their eyes. Americans have always carried a feeling of superiority over other countries believing that 'It couldn't happen here'. Guess what. It's happened and it's getting worse.
              Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
              • Posted by CircuitGuy 9 years, 9 months ago
                "The Founders, amazingly had a pretty sound understanding of human behavior when given power over others and tried the best to provide us with a structure of government that would account for that. "
                Yes! And as you go on to say, that gov't is not the natural state of human existence. It had to be built carefully. I'd hate to see it come down bit by bit.
                Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
                • Posted by CircuitGuy 9 years, 9 months ago
                  "It had to be built carefully. I'd hate to see it come down bit by bit.:"
                  I think whoever voted this down imagined me saying it with a mafioso voice. :)
                  Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
                  • Posted by 9 years, 9 months ago
                    I don't know who voted you down, but I'll offer a comment to your 'bit by bit.' I think a realistic look should convince anyone that it's been brought down bit by bit for the last century if not since it's enactment. The problem we see today is that the bit by bit has accelerated to chunk by chunk of the remaining. When the government (police) can kill unarmed citizens with impunity (even if just by mistake), the government we thought we had is obviously gone. There should be a cost to causing the death of a citizen, if not by pure accident, whether a member of government or a citizen.
                    Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by IIGeo2 9 years, 9 months ago
    http://www.nleomf.org/facts/officer-fata...

    This weighs into many of their minds BUT what the statistics don't tell you is the circumstance of each for example a "Teenager from Kentucky murdered his parents then took police on an extended chase and died in a gun battle with police."
    http://www.cnn.com/2015/02/16/us/marylan...

    Now add in the suddenly crazy person claiming some connection to the global Jihad attacks these types of numbers are mixed in here to. It also doesn't take into account the differences in how law enforcement is treated in the other countries, meaning come with us gets a far more compliant responce then in the average US City,

    Numbers without facts can be very misleading. And the average police officer probably didn't vote for Obama and would probably love to have a drama free day.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by CircuitGuy 9 years, 9 months ago
    When an offier uses lethal force that looks unnecessary, the police say, "he was just following his training." Okay, then we need to look at that training.

    Also, it wouldn't hurt to have fewer laws but rigidly enforced and to have a population armed and willing to fight crime (in terms of protecting lives from violent criminals) themselves without relying only on police.

    The figures in the article are staggering. The countries mentioned have not adopted libertarian ideas like I suggested, yet they manage to kill many fewer suspects.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  

FORMATTING HELP

  • Comment hidden. Undo