Picking up Eddie Willers: a cheat, or a good move?
AS3 ended, of course, with the rescue of John Galt. But I have this question: the last thing that happened, was that Ragnar sent a member of his Air Militia to pick up Eddie Willers.
I think that was a cheat. We ought to have seen him on the broken-down Comet outside of Flagstaff, Arizona. After which maybe he would make his way to Phoenix, or the sheriff of Maricopa County, who by then had declared his own revolt againt the Washington establishment, would make the pickup. But I really think we lost something by not at least having the demonstration of just how badly the collapse had gone.
I think that was a cheat. We ought to have seen him on the broken-down Comet outside of Flagstaff, Arizona. After which maybe he would make his way to Phoenix, or the sheriff of Maricopa County, who by then had declared his own revolt againt the Washington establishment, would make the pickup. But I really think we lost something by not at least having the demonstration of just how badly the collapse had gone.
When Rand left Eddie in a dicey situation, as well as the sorrowful end of Cheryl, she knew what she was doing. She shows the danger to the innocent from all that mooching parasitic collectivist dogma, it is not retribution, it is inevitable that the innocent will suffer.
Artistic license might have been the deciding factor with adding the "Eddie Willers rescue" element at the end - the possible purpose being to finish on a more upbeat note. The final Eddie scene in the book is quite sad and somewhat contradictory to the moral retributive plot theme.
While we're on the movie - I felt the movies suffered terribly from being compressed into 3 feature-length films. The sheer volume of plot material demanded more like 15-20 hours of screen time, and would have triumphed as a one-season TV series, marketed at conservative cable channels, as well as DVD buyers. This could have helped prevent the funding issues that triggered the ludicrous cast changes. Eddie's recasting in particular was bizarre.
Back to Eddie: here is my own proposed revision of the end of Eddie's story:
Eddie agrees to go out to San Francisco to try to sort out the mess with three warring factions, one of which seized the terminal and held trains for ransom. But he has bigger plans than that. He explains these to Dagny, in writing--in an envelope that he slips under her apartment door, or maybe surreptitiously passes to her in the office.
The plans are these: the eastbound Comet will be his escape route. He plans to get off the train in Phoenix, Arizona, on the theory that the Washington boys don't dare send an escort with him, since the California warring factions would just as soon kill a Washington man as look at him. He gets a Comet going out of San Francisco, all right--only it breaks down outside of Flagstaff, as the novel originally reads.
When the wagon train shows up, he gives them a destination, provided they take off everyone from the Comet and "settle up" at destination. Because he has already arranged to sign on with Dan Conway, who hopes to start the Phoenix-Durango RR back up. Dan Conway can do that, because the sheriff of Maricopa County, Arizona, drawing inspiration from John Galt's speech, has revolted against Washington.
As the wagon train draws near, a helicopter posse flies out and meets them. In the lead chopper: the aforementioned sheriff (it doesn't have to be Joe Arpaio if you really don't think he'd do it), and Dan Conway. All you need do, then, is hint at their plans: they'll get a line going up to Durango, Colorado--which is not far from Ouray, Colorado, which in this universe is now named, variously, Atlantis, Mulligan's Valley, and Galt's Gulch.
So when John Galt says, "The road is cleared; we are going back to the world," you cut to Eddie Willers, riding a track motor car, going up the line to where the tracklaying train is busy laying rail through Durango. You know he and Dagny will meet again, this time as counterparts, if not equals, though the movie ends before you see that happen.
I do think it's entertaining intellectually to ponder all the alternatives. But I have to object to the strong word "cheat" in your original post. It implies a very specific premeditated action which I don't think happened to you - or anyone.
Now, I'm going to have to watch it, all over again (for the third time).
BTW...I still haven't found Cherryl Brooks anywhere in Part I, even though she's credited at the end.
It was probably a "deleted scene" that never actually made it into the movie, but they neglected to remove the credit. It also shows up on the IMDB Website.
The movie’s Eddie Willers Rescue was a major compromise of principle. While I can understand a blot of “practical reasons for the movie producers to make that change, I can also understand Rand’s reasons for wiring the story as she did. I’d probably use the descriptor “cheap” rather than “cheat”, ‘tho.
It needs to be pointed out that the first tier of "heroes" are not desert islands. They need reliable people working for them and with them, whether in mines or factories or railroad management or any other enterprise, to make the heroes' vision a success in the world. Those good people, like Rearden's secretary, provide value and deserve to be valued in return.
Of course, although Eddie, hopelessly in love with Dagny, had been willing to live for her sake (without being asked), that did not put an obligation on Dagny to lift a finger for him. The movie makers did right by him.
Remember that, unlike Eddie, Gwen Ives left when Reardon did. I have no doubt that Dagny would have made sure that Eddie Willers made it to safety in the gulch had he been willing to go. The choice was his to make, and he chose to set out on his own [at last?] rather than ride her coattails [as always?]. Cheryl and Tony died, but at least with Eddie there was the ambiguous chance that he could have survived.
However, I think that the implication is clear that Eddie's survival would depend upon his finding a stronger, more decisive person to follow. He was an able second but his career and ultimately his life was always as a follower. Without a strong leader he floundered.
Yes. I like to think people who took the oath didn't think of themselves as first tier or second tier. They were just people, people who sometimes needed/wanted things from one another and were free to trade what they had to get them.
Anyway, I was thinking of the guy who recounted that story.
1. I don't know if they did test screening, but I can easily imagine people saying, "But, what about Eddie?" I've certainly seen people say that about the book.
2. Given that the moviemakers chose to make Eddie black -- which I think was a great choice, given the paucity of obviously minority characters in the book -- perhaps they didn't want to open themselves up to criticism that for some reason a black wasn't welcome in the Gulch.
If you read the book, most of the primary male characters (with the exception of Francisco) had blond hair. Even Ragnar was blond and had a "beautiful" face.