STRAIGHT LOGIC (From today's edition of THE WALL STREET JOURNAL)
‘Secular Stagnation’ and the Cheap Burger
What do Sheldon Silver, the European Central Bank, and McDonald’s have in common?
By
Holman W. Jenkins, Jr.
Jan. 23, 2015 6:21 p.m. ET
It may seem peculiar to link the arrest of New York Assembly Speaker Sheldon Silver with the European Central Bank’s latest monetary legerdemain. And even more peculiar to link both with the troubles of McDonald’s.
But Europe, Japan and the U.S. have been desperate to stir private-sector growth and yet refuse to consider how they treat their private sector. Europe gave itself austerity in which the private sector shrank and the government didn’t. Big-name economists keep insisting monetary policy can conjure growth without anyone having to question any ideological, political or policy embraces of the past three decades.
Nobody asks: How can we make our societies ones in which people find opportunity? They worry about the distribution of income but not the absence of income-creating opportunities for individuals.
The lesson of Sheldon Silver is that this phenomenon has mostly to do with a self-interested machine protecting its own privileges.
Mr. Silver, as you may know, is the long-serving speaker of the New York state assembly, a man the New York Times calls the state’s “most powerful Democrat” and the capital’s “most powerful figure.” He was arrested Thursday for millions of dollars in graft. Two decades of his “service” is why upstate New York is America’s microcosm of France, a place of permanent stagnation. It can’t even avail itself of fracking, as Pennsylvania and Ohio have done, because fracking displeases the disconnected New York City liberals whom Mr. Silver must propitiate to keep himself in power decade after decade.
McDonald’s has had two bad years, and sales are down sharply in the U.S. Meanwhile, Shake Shack is seeking an IPO on Wall Street that would value the tiny chain at $568 million.
This has led some to draw a line of causation, but McDonald’s doesn’t compete for the same customers and its real future may lie more in cost control than in imitating the boutique burger chains like Shake Shack and Five Guys.
McDonald’s has decades of experience in Europe and Japan, and can see where things are going. Our youth unemployment may be half of France’s, but it’s twice the rate that prevailed at a similar point in the 1990s recovery. Our new business formations are the lowest in 35 years, more like Europe than the U.S. According to Gallup, companies are dying faster than new ones are being born.
The administration’s Affordable Care Act raises costs for businesses like McDonald’s that hire thousands of full-time workers at a low wage. Its labor enforcers are overturning settled law to make McDonald’s liable for alleged violations of its independent franchises.
A writer for the New Yorker applauds academic studies showing that hikes in the minimum wage have only a small impact on overall employment, “usually confined to teenagers and unskilled workers”—i.e., McDonald’s workers.
President Obama himself, when he keeps intoning that every job should pay enough to support a family of four, is essentially saying McDonald’s jobs shouldn’t exist.
Though McDonald’s would never put it this way, the company has already started adapting. McDonald’s once filled its U.S. menu with salads, wraps and fruit options that few customers buy. The idea was to appease its foodie critics. Now the company is “simplifying” its menu and giving franchisees freedom to drop non-sellers—and the disproportionate staff needed to support them.
McDonald’s customers were never keen on customization, preferring speed and a cheap price. But now the company is introducing customization-friendly automated and smartphone ordering—because it allows franchisees to cut counter staff.
The essence of Europe’s malaise has long been a politics tilted heavily toward protecting those who have jobs from those who want them, where the biggest losers are the young and unskilled, and where stagnation is the general fate. Even with the bad news of recent years, McDonald’s U.S. stores still generate twice the sales of its competitors, including Burger King. But they also employ twice as many workers, upward of 50 per store. Look for that to shrink as McDonald’s adapts to an America becoming more like Europe, with an economy unwelcoming to the unskilled and unprivileged trying to find an entry into the world of work.
What do Sheldon Silver, the European Central Bank, and McDonald’s have in common?
By
Holman W. Jenkins, Jr.
Jan. 23, 2015 6:21 p.m. ET
It may seem peculiar to link the arrest of New York Assembly Speaker Sheldon Silver with the European Central Bank’s latest monetary legerdemain. And even more peculiar to link both with the troubles of McDonald’s.
But Europe, Japan and the U.S. have been desperate to stir private-sector growth and yet refuse to consider how they treat their private sector. Europe gave itself austerity in which the private sector shrank and the government didn’t. Big-name economists keep insisting monetary policy can conjure growth without anyone having to question any ideological, political or policy embraces of the past three decades.
Nobody asks: How can we make our societies ones in which people find opportunity? They worry about the distribution of income but not the absence of income-creating opportunities for individuals.
The lesson of Sheldon Silver is that this phenomenon has mostly to do with a self-interested machine protecting its own privileges.
Mr. Silver, as you may know, is the long-serving speaker of the New York state assembly, a man the New York Times calls the state’s “most powerful Democrat” and the capital’s “most powerful figure.” He was arrested Thursday for millions of dollars in graft. Two decades of his “service” is why upstate New York is America’s microcosm of France, a place of permanent stagnation. It can’t even avail itself of fracking, as Pennsylvania and Ohio have done, because fracking displeases the disconnected New York City liberals whom Mr. Silver must propitiate to keep himself in power decade after decade.
McDonald’s has had two bad years, and sales are down sharply in the U.S. Meanwhile, Shake Shack is seeking an IPO on Wall Street that would value the tiny chain at $568 million.
This has led some to draw a line of causation, but McDonald’s doesn’t compete for the same customers and its real future may lie more in cost control than in imitating the boutique burger chains like Shake Shack and Five Guys.
McDonald’s has decades of experience in Europe and Japan, and can see where things are going. Our youth unemployment may be half of France’s, but it’s twice the rate that prevailed at a similar point in the 1990s recovery. Our new business formations are the lowest in 35 years, more like Europe than the U.S. According to Gallup, companies are dying faster than new ones are being born.
The administration’s Affordable Care Act raises costs for businesses like McDonald’s that hire thousands of full-time workers at a low wage. Its labor enforcers are overturning settled law to make McDonald’s liable for alleged violations of its independent franchises.
A writer for the New Yorker applauds academic studies showing that hikes in the minimum wage have only a small impact on overall employment, “usually confined to teenagers and unskilled workers”—i.e., McDonald’s workers.
President Obama himself, when he keeps intoning that every job should pay enough to support a family of four, is essentially saying McDonald’s jobs shouldn’t exist.
Though McDonald’s would never put it this way, the company has already started adapting. McDonald’s once filled its U.S. menu with salads, wraps and fruit options that few customers buy. The idea was to appease its foodie critics. Now the company is “simplifying” its menu and giving franchisees freedom to drop non-sellers—and the disproportionate staff needed to support them.
McDonald’s customers were never keen on customization, preferring speed and a cheap price. But now the company is introducing customization-friendly automated and smartphone ordering—because it allows franchisees to cut counter staff.
The essence of Europe’s malaise has long been a politics tilted heavily toward protecting those who have jobs from those who want them, where the biggest losers are the young and unskilled, and where stagnation is the general fate. Even with the bad news of recent years, McDonald’s U.S. stores still generate twice the sales of its competitors, including Burger King. But they also employ twice as many workers, upward of 50 per store. Look for that to shrink as McDonald’s adapts to an America becoming more like Europe, with an economy unwelcoming to the unskilled and unprivileged trying to find an entry into the world of work.
Obama (you didn't build that) does not want to see anyone be successful and this is true of most politicians. They want people to be dependent on them. The only reason they pay lip service to the economy is that they want to get reelected.
The Progressive view on incentives and growth is that we have already grown enough, any additional revenue should be taxed as a winfall so they can help more sheople. This is a dis-incentive.
An assertion I will make is the many Progressives were locked in their rooms for disciplinary reasons as small children. I base this on two observations. 1st, in many of the HUD foreclosures I have purchased I have noticed the door locks are installed to lock them into the children's bedrooms; 2nd, is the complete lack of understanding how incentives work. An example of that would be a mandate and penalty for failing to sign up for the "Affordable Care Act". That is punishment, not incentive. Incentive would be premiums lower than your old plan, more hospitals and doctors than your old plan, and a tax discount for making the change. People would flock to that.
Likewise, if we lowered the Corporate income tax to the lowest industrial nations, companies around the globe considering a new facility would look to the US as a tax haven. If you are an out of work machine operator, does it matter if Mercedes or Glock owns the facility, as long as it's the work you wanted. Low information voters fear all of the money leaving the country, but the truth is only the profit leaves. Labor, materials, utilities, transportation all stay here. If we remodel the corporate taxes the profit would mostly stay here. Not by decree, rather because it wanted to.
Something magic happens if we bring labor back into our solution. The roughly 1/3 of our adult population that now draws a check from FUTA, housing from HUD, and groceries from foodstamps, would become contributors rather than mooches. The cash flow would improve 200% right out of the box, because not only has the draw down stopped, they are now paying taxes in. Progressives never see this either. The concept of incentivizing the job creators to gain the cashflow of the workers in an abstract to them, if it exists at all. If the creators do something like that it needs to be immediately taxed, perhaps at a higher rate so they have paid their fair share. Or should I say fare?
The next skin of onion is the progressives ability to project. Remember the days of $4 gas and the theme "drill baby drill". Those in charge told us it would do no good to drill, we could never solve the problem. Anyone that has ever made a living solving problems knows the sooner you start the sooner it makes a difference. With little or no help from gov't, and on mostly private lands, we broke the monopoly in about 6 years...that's a long time from never. Incentives and new technology are funny that way.
Following the logic of that last example I deduce that if we started creating real incentive, not tax code BS, in a few short years most of us would be working, have money to spend, and have happier more fulfilling lives. Most will not win a Nobel prize, but for most a family, a home, a car, a ladder to climb, a retirement account, and access to health care equal a more enjoyable life.
It has only taken 40 years to go from the "Greatest generation of DOERS, to an entire generation of lazy, entitled, moochers.
Arnold S. the "Governator" had an AWESOME motivation speech that he lived by and became successful at. Listen to him, and ask where has that gone?
I LOVE Arnold's speech. THIS IS HOW TO SUCCEED!!!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R1JBQMXb...
It's a shame that a pointed analysis like yours loses its credibility for using a words like "wage slaves." the people you state are "wage slaves,' are in fact workers that provide the necessary labor that any business needs in exchange for payment as it is valued by both worker and employer. An economy can only function when both parties are satisfied with such an exchange. That does not mean that the value placed on the labor will be a 100% agreeable, but that it is a negotiated agreement and no slavery is involved. To throw around words like slave makes true slavery into a joke.
Fred Speckmann
your last sentence makes my point, it's the word slavery that i find to be the problem. Words have meanings and to use them out of context cheapens your legitimate points. Furthermore, your other explanation of bad experiences for some employees leaves out that they are free to choose another job or start their own business. No one ever promised that work is always going to be pleasant, that's why it's called work and not fun play.
Fred Speckmann
I hope that you can make yourself a bit more clear. For instance, what is the definition of the limit at which one looses the ownership of oneself? Or: it would seem to me that when one exerts one's efforts, those efforts are by definition one's own. The products of those efforts may or may not have a different owner.
When someone else can come in and take or own what you produce or do regardless of your opinion on the matter.
For example:
If someone takes your work without your consent then you are not free.
If someone dictates how you act, you are not free.
"Or: it would seem to me that when one exerts one's efforts, those efforts are by definition one's own."
That is the point, you don't own your efforts. In a job where that is seemingly the case you are actually paid for your efforts or your work on a given project. Thus your work is yours even if the final product is not.
However you are no longer free when your efforts are taken without your consent, or a mutually agreeable settlement.
Thank you.
I think that I understood that long time ago. I was trying to politely show that there is a confusion in how people speak about action, effort, work and product. In my opinion, action is any volitional bodily movement or volitional and conscious thought process. Effort is action directed toward a desirable outcome, which can be a physical product or a result of the thought processes, such as a conclusion. Work is exertion of power, i.e. effort, over some defined time. Product is the result of that physical work or a "communicable recording" of the conclusion (see above) and, sometimes, of the "thought path" to reach it.
With that in mind, I would say that as long as I am conscious, I myself and nobody else "owns" me. I am enslaved if another can threaten me with bodily or mental suffering, unless I take actions that he commands me to take, contrary to my rational self-interest.
I see plenty of people misusing the term "slave". The way I understand it, income tax has nothing to do with slavery. Humans, being social animals, always have needed some kind of social structure, i.e. "government". Government produces nothing and, thus, the cost of government must be born by the "governed", i.e. some kind of tax.
All the best.
Bravo Sir, you not only have your finger on the problem but have very articulately explained all the factors involved in the potential damage of forcing increased wages on the fast food business.
Your explanation of the damage corrupt politicians like NY Assembly Speaker Sheldon Silver cause to economies in the states or for that matter the Us economy as a whole is also right on the money, pun intended.
The European examples you p[resented are also 100% on point. Politicians worldwide will never acknowledge that even though they know the truth of the negative effects of high taxes and regulations because sadly their denial of these truths are based on their own corruption. No truer words were ever spoken than by Lord Acton, "Power tends to corrupt, and absolute power corrupts absolutely."
Fred Speckmann
Those cartoons would be very useful today. Air them on TV and make them mandatory viewing in schools.
Aha, after a little digging, I found them. "Heir-Conditioned", "By Word of Mouse" and "Yankee Dood It"
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2auI6Uz3...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Kh0ibjXC...
By the way, Thank you Mr. Silver for giving bigots and jihadists another reason to hate Jews. They've got enough problems without your "help."
Didn't Obama, the most highest elite best of all betters, say that everything is getting better in the state of our union?
That means that those elitists who know what is best for us may just continue to do what they are doing. For they are just so much smarter.
Pass the Kool-Aid, please.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LHFEcyUN...
http://www.usdebtclock.org/
If every person should be enabled to raise a family of four, what is the incentive to earn more before starting a family?
1) You have not shrugged yet.
2) You want to be prepared for when the producers are in power again.
3) You are getting ready for Atlantis until you are recruited, which I just might do if you choose to get ready for Atlantis at Florida Tech.
4) You have Dagny's need to save what is left rather than Galt's desire to destroy that which has been produced so that it cannot be used against the producers.