Muslims and the use of force...
I believe that Ayn would agree, but I think it is fair to say that an extermination effort must be waged against radical muslims. After all, we would only be emplying the use of force against those who initiated it. But, as she stated you cant recognize a murderers sanction to kill you....
and it allows others to come in here and make assumptions about this group which would be wrong. Why are you not retracting your word choice? I am not just playing semantics here
The perpetrators are members of a group, BokoHaram, they identify as being of that group. All that group are in it. Their violence is an act of war. Membership of that group is predominately voluntary except for those kidnapped. So, the rules of war apply.
The same thinking applies to Al-Qaeda, ISIS, and so on. What about Muslims and progressivistas who are not engaged in violence? Yes they are individuals, many would be on the hit list, but their tolerance of aggression and willingness to be victims should not give them special rights such as applying censorship or to not be offended. Yes they are in a predicament but it is largely their own choice.
http://rt.com/news/221475-nigeria-girl-s...
suicide bomber as young as 10 years old blew herself up at a market in Nigeria, killing between 16 and 20 people,
http://rt.com/news/221347-nigeria-insurg...
Boko Haram, the extremist Islamic group that wants to enforce Sharia Law across Nigeria, has inflicted mass casualties in northeast Nigeria. Some reports put the number of fatalities as high as 2,000.
http://rt.com/news/209903-nigeria-mosque...
Suicide bombers followed up by gunmen have killed at least 120 people and wounded 270 others in a mosque, which was the place of worship of Nigeria's top anti-Boko Haram cleric
I don't know what's in the perpetrators' minds, but I suspect their whole goal is to goad people into over-reaction. They're a band of criminals, no real threat to what I'll call the "normal" people of the world, who in some form or another want basic liberty and prosperity. These "normal" people say people can be treated like individuals and disputes and crimes can be handled by rule of law, and you can have you Lexus without sacrificing all of your Olive Tree. The criminals, though, want to make it about group identities. They are anti-objectivist no only for committing murder and other crimes but in their end goals. Their hope is to goad the "normal" people away from their belief in rule of law, empiricism, and rational thought. The inflammatory language plays right into their hands.