Corruption

Posted by JohnBrown 10 years ago to Philosophy
10 comments | Share | Best of... | Flag

When the people believe that stealing is not stealing if they vote to have others steal for them, and when they believe they have a right to others’ property, they have become corrupt. Changing the word “steal” for “tax,” “penalty”, “mandate,” or “requirement” may sound nicer, but it doesn’t make it something else. When politicians recognize no limits on their power, they have become corrupt, too. Whether they are evil, ignorant, or negligent is largely irrelevant. Politicians simply reflect the state of opinion, and if the people have become corrupt, their politicians will be, too.

The gradual loss of economic and social freedoms isn’t something foisted upon the people, but rather an ongoing exercise in which they have willingly participated. They have voted for their own enslavement, lured by their own avarice and ignorance. The excuse of unintended consequences to explain why domestic and foreign policy has produced the opposite of that claimed for it no longer has any merit, if it ever did. “We mean well” rings hollow. People of character who “mean well,” only to have it all blow up in their faces, would apologize. They would offer to reverse what they have done, right the wrongs, or quit in disgrace. But politicians never apologize for what they’ve done; the wars they’ve started, the violence they’ve launched, the lives they’ve ruined.

It does the cause of liberty no good to give those who do evil, or support evil, the benefit of the doubt, or excuse them because they claim not to know the damage they’ve wrought. We ought to call an evil by what it is—evil. Rendering people destitute through command and control of the economy is evil. Spying on the people, scooping up all their private information without a proper warrant, is evil. Indefinite detention without charge, and torture—even torture that doesn’t leave a physical mark—is evil. We should no longer be willing to say these things are unintended, or unfortunate byproducts of laws supported by otherwise well-meaning people. Their intentions are irrelevant. We can judge them well enough by what they have done.

As to whether the preceding is charitable or productive, it is probably neither. There just doesn’t seem to be much point in trying to reason with the willfully irrational or change the hearts of those who are downright evil. But ignorance can be changed through education, and there are more information channels and outlets than ever before. There may be a substantial number of people who are merely ignorant, those who’ve never cared before but who are reasonably open-minded. Maybe we can persuade these people to start caring. Most people now seem to know a little of what libertarianism is, or at least have heard of it, something that wasn’t true even 10 years ago. It’s encouraging. But maybe they won’t care until they get the midnight-knock-on-the-door, or a friend or family member disappears. In any event, we must keep trying to reach out as best we can, politely and respectfully making the case that human beings ought to live in freedom. It’s the only thing we can do. It’s why I wrote State of Terror.


Add Comment

FORMATTING HELP

All Comments Hide marked as read Mark all as read

  • Posted by $ rockymountainpirate 10 years ago
    Well said. It brings to mind a part of Galt's speech.

    "I am speaking to those who desire to live and to recapture the honor of their soul.  Now that you know the truth about your world, stop supporting your own destroyers.  The evil of the world is made possible by nothing but the sanction you give it.  Withdraw your sanction.  Withdraw your support.  Do not try to live on your enemies' terms or to win at a game where they're setting the rules.  Do not seek the favor of those who enslaved you, do not beg for alms from those who have robbed you, be it subsidies, loans or jobs, do not join their team to recoup what they've taken by helping them rob your neighbors.  One cannot hope to maintain one's life by accepting bribes to condone one's destruction.  Do not struggle for profit, success or security at the price of a lien on your right to exist.  Such a lien is not to be paid off; the more you pay them, the more they will demand; the greater the values you seek or achieve, the more vulnerably helpless you become.  Theirs is a system of white blackmail devised to bleed you, not by means of your sins, but by means of your love for existence." 
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Comment hidden by post owner or admin, or due to low comment or member score. View Comment
  • Posted by Robbie53024 10 years ago
    Paragraphs 2 & 3: Many politicians, most D's and nearly all R's, believe that they are smarter and can control something that is uncontrollable. They are unapologetic because they don't see that they are incapable of managing the economy. And when things don't go as they planned, they merely chalk it up to not doing enough or having enough control.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Comment hidden by post owner or admin, or due to low comment or member score. View Comment
  • Posted by Robbie53024 10 years ago
    First paragraph: I agree, except that I think the politicians lead the corruption, not the other way around.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
    • Posted by 10 years ago
      The corrupt politicians may lead, but it takes a corrupt or ignorant population to follow.
      Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
      • Comment hidden by post owner or admin, or due to low comment or member score. View Comment
      • Posted by Robbie53024 10 years ago
        When cronyism and corruption become the norm and the only way to get ahead, even a rational person has to come to the conclusion that that behavior is the "right" behavior. I sometimes wonder why I continue to play it straight. Fill out my taxes honestly, don't rig my finances to look like I'm poor while living an upper middle class life. The developer of my sub-division has his real-estate business and multi-million dollar home in his mother in laws name, he draws a modest salary. His 9 kids all are receiving needs based scholarships for college (at least those that have made it to college so far). Yet my kids are paying full tuition, which in reality means that I'm subsidizing his kids who are getting tuition reduction. At times, I wonder why I'm so stupid to continue not behaving corruptly.
        Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
        • Posted by Animal 10 years ago
          I have, on more than one occasion, thought that if I wasn't an honest person I would have started my own religion by now. The benefits include tax exemption, free housing and legions of minions willing to fork over cash.

          Hell, it worked for L. Ron Hubbard, didn't it?

          When I get that urge I either re-read Kurt Vonnegut's "Cat's Cradle" or watch Burt Lancaster in "Elmer Gantry," and the urge subsides.
          Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
        • Posted by 10 years ago
          You have taken the honorable way, refusing to live at the expense of others. You are not a sucker, nor are you a welfare queen. No one owes you anything but what what you have earned. You don't have to "give back" because you never took. You are not stupid, and you are not corrupt, despite the temptation. You've preserved your integrity and character, and that often requires some fortitude. That said, playing it straight on taxes is a different matter; it may be influenced by a little fear. I, too, simply pay ruinous taxes without any subterfuge, certainly not out of any sense of obligation or guilt, but because I fear the government and I want to be able to sleep at night.
          Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  

FORMATTING HELP

  • Comment hidden. Undo