Loretta Lynch should not be Attorney General
It would be a conflict of interest. She indicted Michael Grimms the only Republican representing NY (well till this month, anyway) Despite the attempt to prosecute him in the public-eye he won re-election . The Dems dropped five million fighting for that seat and still lost.
When Obama made his official announcement today, I got curious aout the history because outgoing Sen. Patrick Leahy was the only one in attendance today. .As the senate’s senior senator, Patrick Leahy is the current President pro-tempor, the third in line for the office of President. You know who is now? Charles Schumer of NY. Schumer is already suspected of instigating the IRS harassments. How easily do you think it would be to use the office of the AG to further a case against Grimms on behalf of NY democrats? How do we know that hasn’t already happened with Lynch being a known advisor to Holder? I’m not liking this at all. She can’t be allowed to serve as AG until the Grimms case is over. it’s not right.
When Obama made his official announcement today, I got curious aout the history because outgoing Sen. Patrick Leahy was the only one in attendance today. .As the senate’s senior senator, Patrick Leahy is the current President pro-tempor, the third in line for the office of President. You know who is now? Charles Schumer of NY. Schumer is already suspected of instigating the IRS harassments. How easily do you think it would be to use the office of the AG to further a case against Grimms on behalf of NY democrats? How do we know that hasn’t already happened with Lynch being a known advisor to Holder? I’m not liking this at all. She can’t be allowed to serve as AG until the Grimms case is over. it’s not right.
Sometimes it does seem Obama should be counted as still standing in line for the job, but no. Lol.
I’m speculating this was planned. They roll her out without any democrats in attendance but the one, outgoing, senior senator, Leahy. Obama even made a comment about how the low attendance was due to it being Saturday in Washington. I’m not buying it. Why do it on Saturday, then? Lynch wasn’t on the short-list for consideration released by the WH, but they did mention there would be a few other names that would be considered. They are acting...shady so I am paying attention.
I am not adept at politics, but if one knew of, say, a highly qualified Asian-American female prospect for this position, one could work that angle.
Jan
Ah, and Lynch is appropriately named for what she tried to do to Michael Grimms. Y'all be careful how far you stick your necks out on just about anything, GOP dudes and dudettes.
I don’t care what color she is. She shouldn’t be nominated while currently investigating a sitting senator. Grimms should have his day in court --first. This is a conflict of interest. Grimms isn’t on my radar to support or attack at this time. So, I’m not defending him personally at this as of yet.
ODS? Call it what you like --Obama has not shown a willingness to at least ‘learn on the job’ how to govern ethically. Instead, he has lied, patronized, and politicized every damn thing he has done. Tis is how I feel and have stated before, "Always campaigning --that one."
“This site has some of the most undercover racist comments disguised as ideology that I have ever seen”
Oh, really? Well, for future reference when I want your opinion, I’ll give it to you.
I forgot Grimms was the specific politician who made that threat.
I am positive I would be against any WASP manly man the Socialist-In-Chief would appoint to anything because the dude would have to be some sort of corrupt progressive that will likely add to this administration's unbelievably long scandal sheet.
At this point I think Dr. Ben Carson is the best choice for president.
http://www.breitbart.com/Breitbart-TV/20...
http://www.infoplease.com/ipa/A0101032.h...
-- j
out here!!! -- j