Add Comment

FORMATTING HELP

All Comments Hide marked as read Mark all as read

  • Posted by Temlakos 10 years ago
    That's a direct violation, not only of the Free Exercise of Religion clause, but also of the Peaceable Assembly clause.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
    • Posted by $ MikeMarotta 10 years ago
      The Federal Constitution and its Bill of Rights was intended originally to apply ONLY to the Federal government, not to states or to the cities that they incorporate. Massachusetts taxed the populace on behalf of the Congregational church until 1839. The so-called "bright line between church and state" was meant for the Federal government, originally.

      If you want to argue a unified nation, where states are mere administrative units of the central government, that's fine. It could be objectively defensive of individual rights. But it is not the framework of so-called "states' rights federalism." Most of the people who self-identify as "conservatives" do not want the federal government interfering in local affairs.

      Myself, I have a totally different take on this. However, I do note the apparent contradiction in what I perceive as your other opinions versus this.
      Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
      • Posted by Temlakos 10 years ago
        The Fourteenth Amendment gives the incorporation. "No State shall make or enforce eny law which abridges the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States."
        Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
        • Posted by $ MikeMarotta 10 years ago
          The 14th Amendment makes it illegal to question the public debt: whole hog or none. Perhaps the next time you want to complain about Federal Reserve Notes, you will just find a federal police agency and turn yourself in.
          Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
          • Posted by 10 years ago
            this was specifically about the Civil War. To suggest that it goes on for every outrageous expenditure of the Congress to infinity, is taking it out of context, which is a typical technique of charlatans and tyrants
            Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by Zenphamy 10 years ago
    Going after the pastors is wrong in any light. But I've been in a lot of non-gendered restrooms--trust me, there's not that much to be seen and it's just not a particularly sexy environment.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
    • Posted by $ MikeMarotta 10 years ago
      I agree. The claim that "predators" dressed as women will enter women's restrooms is a strawman, by which I mean "strawperson-of-chosen-gender."

      I note also, the slight against "6-year-old Coy Mathis – a boy who says he thinks he’s a girl..." As I understand the case, Mathis is a girl, in her head where it matters most. We accept that people can be born with six toes or no color perception. Gender and sex are equally variable. The real problem is law: making criminal offenses out of civil suits. Invest in your own pubic restroom, charge admission, make your own complicated rules, and enforce them at your own expense.
      Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
    • Posted by $ Abaco 10 years ago
      It doesn't matter what your personal experiences have been in non-gendered restrooms. What if I were an OB/GYN and said, "Oh, I've spent countless hours between women's legs and hardly ever got excited. There's nothing to worry about. Let others do it too." Total hogwash argument.

      I pity the creep who sneaks into a bathroom behind my wife or daughter. Go to the "not particular sexy environment" in the men's room.
      Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by JEbrom 10 years ago
    Sean Hannity told one of the Reverands (today on his show) to take a stand, don't give in and He'll post bond for any or all of them that get arrested. If they give in now, it will be over - or so far gone that the fight won't be worth it. And Anise isn't our problem, I believe that Barry wants Anise to keep starting fires so that when election comes around Wendy Davis will win over Greg Abbott. That will ruin Texas. Obamacare will be implemented, there will be NO borders, Common core will go into effect - it will destroy us.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ blarman 10 years ago
    What is both telling and frightening is that this isn't being splayed across the pages of newpapers nationwide. This is nothing short of the intimidation of free speech, and the journalists themselves should be the first ones to decry these gestapo tactics.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
    • Posted by $ MikeMarotta 10 years ago
      Not up there with ebola and ISIS, but buried with the national debt and the failure to colonize Mars... Houston is just a city, like many others its size. The founders of the American republic were educated in the classics of Greek and Latin literature:
      E pluribus unum - just another one of a lot of the same
      Sic transit gloria mundi - Nothing new under the sun.
      Aurea mediocritus - Read your Aristotle
      Repetitio est mater studorium - If at first you do not succeed, try, try again.
      O tempes! O mores! - you people are idiots.

      Houston has a huge Asian population that is forced to embrace a wide ethnic across Vietnamese and Chinese, as if they are all the same. No one cares about that in screaming headlines, nor should they.
      Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by Herb7734 10 years ago
    Pass a stupid crazy law to fight a stupid crazy law. It's stupid and crazy. It is, however, a perfect example of the degeneration that happens when anything is run by progressives. Everybody's the same and there's no delineation between genders and anyone who says different is a...(fill in the blank).
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  

FORMATTING HELP

  • Comment hidden. Undo