Uncle Sam admits monitoring you for these 377 words:
Posted by UncommonSense 10 years, 4 months ago to Government
This is an older story, but one I think may not have made it into the Gulch. FYI. 377 words the gubbermeant is watching out for. Feel safer yet? Don't forget: it's for the economy, the children, the 'little guy', the environment...any other excuse I left out?
Real terrorists would be far too careful for this to matter.
I doubt the article b/c the words are so common as to flag almost any communication. They're not odd words like rare chemicals or names of weapons parts but rather everyday words that appear in every newspaper. If it's true, it's just a backdoor way of saying they monitor *everything*. The only way it could be any more general is if they added a, an, the, and all forms of "to be".
home of the brave and land of the free exists no more!
Sorry, but big brother set up shop while everyone was busy trying to decide whether to put a new flag on their car antenna or not.
Can't close the barn door now, no more than you can on ebola after you send thousands to get infected and bring it back. (Oh yeah, that was an al queda plan - get a group infected with some nasty disease, and bring them back into airports. Why is our government following that plan??)
can't say on television -- we just don't say 'em! but,
with these, a casual conversation about a Coastie
friend might get you trapped. -- j
tsk, tsk
2.1 Incidents that Warrant an IOI
Terrorist incidents (including foreign countries)
Major natural disasters (e.g., floods, tornadoes, earthquakes)
Transportation incidents where major bottlenecks may occur or chemical/explosive
hazards exist
Incidents that could result in injury to a local population (e.g., fire at a chemical
production facility releasing toxic fumes)
Incidents that result in damage to critical infrastructure
Safety issues (e.g., aircraft emergency)
Certain crimes (e.g., snipers, mall/school shootings, major drug busts, illegal
immigrant busts, etc).
Policy directives, debates, and implementations related to DHS
So even though the list contains some regularly used words. unless they relate to the items above, they are ignored.
Your Privacy is also protected:
3 Personally Identifiable Information (PII) Guidance:
PII refers to information that can be used to uniquely identify, contact, or locate a single person
or can be used with other sources to uniquely identify a single individual. Before sending out
ANY reports, including IOIs, ]\al33l analysts must ensure that if there is any PII included in a
media article, that information must be removed, due to privacy issues! (Figure 6, IOI Example
)
Generally, both MMC and SN must never send out any IOIs with PII included except in
“extremis situations”. An extremis situation occurs when there is an imminent threat of loss of
life, serious bodily harm, or damage/destruction to critical facilities or equipment (in these
circumstances, the appropriate DHS OPS authority must approve PII, in which case, TSI
management would need to be made aware of the situation). Note: The DHS OPS authority
includes OPS Senior Executive leadership and the SWO.
The following are cases in which PII must be removed from all MMC reports:
1) Names, positions, or other information that would enable someone to determine the
identity of a particular person
a. The Privacy Impact Assessment (PIA) allows for certain exemptions in which PII
may be included to identify spokesmen, government officials and reporters. Note:
Refer to section 3.1 and the current PIA for more information
2) Names of known or suspected terrorists, DTO leaders, or other individuals who are a
threat to homeland security, regardless of whether a U.S. citizen or non-U.S. citizen
3) Links to the actual articles or postings referenced provided the links themselves do not
contain PII. In this case the analyst would use “No Link Due To PII” instead of the
actual link.
4) Addresses that would reveal where a person lives. In this case the analyst would either
delete the street address completely generalize it to the street block. Example: instead of
using “1345 John Doe Avenue”, the analyst could use “the 1300 block of John Doe
Avenue”.
Note: The MMC watch may provide the name, position, or other information considered to be
PII to the NOC over the telephone when approved by the appropriate DHS OPS authority. But
that information must not be stored in a database that could be searched by an individual’s PII.
Read for yourself:
http://epic.org/foia/epic-v-dhs-media-mo...
Wouldn't be a bad e-mail signature either.
Let's see....did I use any of the "wrong" words in this post?