Cultural Relativity

Posted by $ SpiritWoman 1 month, 1 week ago to Culture
36 comments | Share | Flag

I hesitate doing this, but here goes. Franz Boas introduced the concept of cultural relativity. I don't understand it well, and wouldn't agree with it if I did, but here is Wikipedia's interpretation:

Cultural relativism is the position that there is no universal standard to measure cultures by, and that all cultural values and beliefs must be understood relative to their cultural context, and not judged based on outside norms and values.

The link I posted is to the 1953 film, The Story of Three Loves, and in the first story, "The Jealous Lover", Moira Shearer, the great Scottish ballerina, dances to parts of Rachmaninoff's 'Rhapsody on a Theme of Paganini', including the superb 18th variation. (I watched this on my black and white TV when I was about 14 or 15. Rachmaninoff has remained my favorite composer, and this piece my favorite music.)

The rhapsody, the dance, is immortal. It appeals to our highest instincts, a level of intellect combined with emotion that cannot, literally cannot, be excelled.

The ballet begins at 22:48 and continues to 29:30. She is like an angel, a sprite dancing on air.

Now compare to the African dancing found in places like Guinea-Bissau (a good one to view is "Traditional Guinea-Bissau Dances in Danger" that gratifies our most basic instincts, as Freud calls it: lustprinzip: the pleasure principle.

Cultural relativity.
SOURCE URL: https://www.bing.com/videos/riverview/relatedvideo?q=A+Story+of+three+loves%2c+film%2c+internet+archive&mid=84065EAFF4AE225BD3B484065EAFF4AE225BD3B4&cvid=FF17BC8FB3CC4DF99F3D3032A23EDD92&FORM=VIRE


Add Comment

FORMATTING HELP

All Comments Hide marked as read Mark all as read

  • Posted by $ sekeres 1 month ago
    The "universal standard to measure cultures by" is how they affect the survival of the human race. Rand's "sense of life" would value a cultural "world of light and confidence" over one of "fear and darkness . . . horrible punishment."

    Thomas Sowell theorizes that in mild climates survival is physically easier thereby leading to observed "lesser" cultures. Jewish over performance in Nobel prizes, math and science may, likewise, be related to cultural persecution and "survival of the fittest."
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
    • Posted by $ 1 month ago
      He's close, but so was Montesquieu.

      My theories involve the evolution of a greater sense of foresight that developed in the Northern climes resulting in the Neanderthal DNA that most humans---those with lighter skin color---have. See my conversation with the olduglycarl.
      Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ 1 month, 1 week ago
    And substantiation:

    Found this in "Civilisation" by Kenneth Clark (1969). On p.2, where he is comparing 1. The "Apollo of the Belvedere" with 2. an African mask. I
    "To the Negro imagination, [the world of their imagination] is a world of fear and darkness, ready to inflect horrible punishment for the smallest infringement of a taboo. To the Hellenistic imagination it is a world of light and confidence, in which the gods are like ourselves' only more beautiful and descend to earth in order to teach men reason and the laws of harmony."
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ 1 month ago in reply to this comment.
    Yes, you must. But I'm beginning to get the picture.

    Putting yourself down, negatively criticizing yourself so others not as talented or intelligent or even as moral as yourself can feel better. The destruction of everything good in yourself, by yourself, solely in order that others can think they are as good or as intelligent or as talented as you.

    A horrid, horrid thing to do. It not only destroys you, it destroys civilization. And this is what happened to America: use their morals against them, urged Saul Alinsky. And so we have Affirmative Action, and meritless advancement and everything else that destroys the 'good'. What was the name of the man who wrote for the newspapers, who exalted the mediocre over the excellent? And in the 1940's film of The Fountainhead gave us the great line: "I deal in the human spirit; and I sell short".

    I remember; Ellsworth Toohey.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ Olduglycarl 1 month ago
    My observations agree with yours.
    My take is: Once Conscious Introspection is attained, common morals are realized and filter through society. Observer the west, (yes, much of our morals were realized by the old testament man, Hebrews and Christ) BUT, they are observable and commonly realized once one introspects his and others behavior)
    (60% of the population has yet to demonstrate any introspection [conscience] at all)

    Marcel Knewtson (sp) of the Julian Jaynes Society did an updated version of the works of Jaynes and did a study of current world cultures.
    (can't find his book right now in my book case)
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
    • Posted by $ 1 month ago
      I think Sartre once said any moral system is good, as long as it is consistent within itself which is pure French hogwash. An individual in a functioning community must be able to judge and anticipate another's actions and behavior. Unless he is familiar with the morals of this 'other' he cannot do that. That is one reason it is difficult for cultures to integrate.

      For me, morals refer to beliefs, convictions, that aid or guide the individual so that not only interaction in the present is at an optimum, but that the future can be attained. Read into that whatever you want.
      Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
      • Posted by $ Olduglycarl 1 month ago
        Judging/treating others like you would judge /Treat yourself.
        If one cannot make that jump then they indeed have not awakened . . .
        Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
        • Posted by $ 1 month ago
          The Golden Rule is always appropriate. One reason why I felt Piaget's statement that a child's morals develop when he learns respect for the rules. I'll finish his book; he may have refined that definition.

          Morals develop when a child learns respect for himself and then others. For self-respect is a necessary condition for respecting others. And the Golden Rule covers it all, mostly. Though in certain cultures, how you treat yourself will differ from other cultures, don't you think?

          The Mandans' treatment of young men coming into adulthood, as outlined by George Caitlin, is evidence for this.
          Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
    • Posted by $ Olduglycarl 1 month ago
      Gods, Voices and the Bicameral Mind, the theories of Julian Jaynes Edited by Marcel Kuijsten.

      Ps, it should be the bicameral brain. The mind is not physical
      Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
      • Posted by $ 1 month ago
        What is your own book about, carl?
        Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
        • Posted by $ Olduglycarl 1 month ago
          A study/description of those that have traditionally assumed rule over everyone else and some of the things they did to confound us.
          Along the way, I am also trying to define what being consciously human is and wondering if we might be an important cog in the Universe.

          I planned to continue the work with psychological and scientific studies but life since finishing the first book has been waaaaaay tooooo invasive.
          Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
          • Posted by $ 1 month ago
            I'm reading it now. Are you a therapist yourself, or a teacher?

            Just don't forget, some people have to be leaders, or guides. The U.S. Constitution was unique in that he has shown us how to limit the 'will to power' of men in positions of authority.
            Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
            • Posted by $ Olduglycarl 1 month ago
              No, I just battled graves disease, hyperactivity and an interest in many things with a slightly above average IQ. Due to the hyperactivity I chose to learn physical skills instead of mental ones, I could have done many things. Did well in college and earned a BA in Business and Economics.

              Yes but most that find their way into government or assume rule over the rest of us have no conscience what so ever. They find their way there because there isn't much else they can do, They have to live off us or they have inherited money which gives them the ability to hide the fact that they are nothing like us and they'd be in deep shit if we found out. Perhaps that is the inbetween bicameral / introspective that Jaynes alludes to.
              I suspect psychopathy for most of them.
              Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
              • Posted by $ 1 month ago
                Most...have no conscience. But in America, hasn't the electorate put them there in the first place?
                Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
                • Posted by $ Olduglycarl 1 month ago
                  Yea because they did a great job bullshitting us, remember, they need to hide the fact that they are nothing like us, abet, a fair number are just swimming in a sea of inabilities.
                  The real interesting question is how do those with a conscience, intelligence and skill go arye so badly.
                  To just say that "we" are flawed is insufficient and lacking insight. I am tired of hearing that response.
                  Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
                  • Posted by $ 1 month ago
                    The 'elites' in America, carl, dumbed the youth of America down so that all would be equal. Affirmative Action, etc. Math is racist, all that nonsense. Once the electorate has been made less intelligent, they can be controlled like sheep. So these 'power mongers' you refer to are not all that stupid.
                    Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
                    • Posted by $ Olduglycarl 1 month ago
                      Compared to a fully functional consciously introspective humans they are. Most brilliant psychopaths use only half their brain primarily.

                      And Yes, they have continued to dumb us down but "We the People" have been electing idiots for a long time.
                      Perhaps our "Moral Empathy" gets in the way.
                      (not advocating for ignoring that)

                      Heard a new phrase in the past two weeks: Suicidal Empathy . . .
                      Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
      • Posted by $ 1 month ago
        I wanted to bring up the development of reason, the age of seven in most philosophical and psychological disciplines, is most important in the development of morals. The sense of the 'future' (the about to be), and its relation to cause and effect, and actions in the present with consequences in the future.

        Until a child has reached that period of growth, morals are really not applicable, only as Piaget said, it is respect for rules, and in primitive societies this was paralleled by taboos.

        Moral behavior in humans of necessity involves the awareness of consequences.

        And the evolution of foresight, in the races of man, to a lessor or greater degree, determines our ability to discern consequences.

        Bronowski's The Ascent of Man goes into some of that relation. Building of cathedrals, etc.
        Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
        • Posted by $ Olduglycarl 1 month ago
          Yes! The age of reason was the results of awareness of one's own awareness. That which gave light to introspection.
          My theory is that about 2500/3000 years ago, Actuaries noted that our magnetic field achieved full strength, which I know, inturn shielded the brain and the body from extreme cosmic radiation, ( we are just beginning to experience that right now) Lots of research in this area.

          Mankind could finally (or once again) realize the voice in his head was his own. (both sides of the brain could now communicate and act as one on occasion).

          In short, introspection, observations and reason allowed us to come to similar moral observations.
          Most other cultures in the world did not go through this, for many it had to be learned or "Ruled" because they still were not fully aware of their own awareness- Genetic?
          Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
          • Posted by $ 1 month ago
            Self-awareness and ability to instrospect are very important. It may be that some subspecies of humans have not yet had the opportunity to learn or to develop that complete separation, from mother, from other individuals, from the community, that would allow them to think of themselves as a being apart from others. So self-awareness for these people cannot be separated from that of the community. I mean this particularly for the Sub-Saharan Africans.
            Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
          • Posted by $ 1 month ago
            Not a bad theory. I've heard others state that about 600 BC there seemed to be a movement toward an 'enlightenment'; a primitive enlightenment: math, alphabet, religion, Abrahamic and Buddhist. And that also could be.

            But the origination of foresight, that ability in man that allows him to 'sense' future periods of time, as well as memory, we---evolutionists, etc.---think it happened around the time of the ice ages, and gave rise to mutations in the DNA that resulted in Neanderthal. Humans, except for the blacks of Sub-Saharan Africa and their descendants, have a partial amount of Neanderthal DNA. This has also given them a lighter skin color, and changes in the immune system, as well as this more extended sense of foresight, that enables more precise organizational skills and planning.

            I think the Negro genetics stuck with the old ways, because of the survival needs: pattern recognition, the old immune system, the old skin color.

            I took the Ghanaian IQ test about six years ago, and it was quite difficult toward the end, as it involved pattern recognition and possible ability to discern changes in pattern. This is more a right brain trait; reason and awareness of cause-and-effect appear in the left brain. It's a bit more complicated than that, but that is the essence.
            Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
      • Posted by $ 1 month ago
        If you want to get into that, which I don't, how does thinking, an intangible, massless 'something' arise from physicality in the first place? Is it electromagnetic? If so, then it is certainly related to the physics of nature.
        Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  

FORMATTING HELP

  • Comment hidden. Undo