Loper Bright Enterprises v. Raimondo: The Supreme Court Battle Against the Administrative State
Posted by freedomforall 9 months ago to Politics
Excerpt:
"The Supreme Court is currently reviewing a case that could impact your individual liberty. And you probably haven’t heard about it.
The case began in November 2022, when Loper Bright Enterprises, a fishery based out of Cape May, New Jersey, appealed a district court opinion to the Supreme Court. The conflict between Loper Bright and the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) started after the agency decided to require private fisheries like Loper Bright to pay their regulatory inspectors for their time observing fishery practices.
While the law doesn’t explicitly allow this practice, the Fishery Service cites the Chevron Deference, a precedent set by a 1984 Supreme Court case, which states that an ambiguous law can be interpreted by government agencies as they see fit. In short, the Fishery Service wants private companies to pay their salaries and found a legal loophole to justify it.
While this may seem like an isolated incident, it is just one example of a long history of government agencies infringing on individual liberty. The outcome of this case holds supreme importance for the future of our republic and the preservation of our financial and civil freedoms."
"The Supreme Court is currently reviewing a case that could impact your individual liberty. And you probably haven’t heard about it.
The case began in November 2022, when Loper Bright Enterprises, a fishery based out of Cape May, New Jersey, appealed a district court opinion to the Supreme Court. The conflict between Loper Bright and the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) started after the agency decided to require private fisheries like Loper Bright to pay their regulatory inspectors for their time observing fishery practices.
While the law doesn’t explicitly allow this practice, the Fishery Service cites the Chevron Deference, a precedent set by a 1984 Supreme Court case, which states that an ambiguous law can be interpreted by government agencies as they see fit. In short, the Fishery Service wants private companies to pay their salaries and found a legal loophole to justify it.
While this may seem like an isolated incident, it is just one example of a long history of government agencies infringing on individual liberty. The outcome of this case holds supreme importance for the future of our republic and the preservation of our financial and civil freedoms."
I'd do an Ellis Wyatt first.
If they are not a state agency then they can't charge anyone unless their service was solicited, right?
Sometimes, though, we want simply to wipe out DC, tossing the baby out with the bathwater, especially if we hold W. C. Fields' attitude towards small children. We should remember, though, the words of Will Rogers, who said, “Occasionally, an innocent man is elected to Congress.”
Why did "blood suckers" just up and jump into me dino head?
To hell with anyone having to pay any too big (for obese) government regulatory inspectors.
https://reason.com/2024/06/20/scotus-...
Butt head!