Ethicists could well design ethics classes around both real life and fictional drama, and interested readers could better their third- and fourth-order skills by analyzing drama.
Thanks. Good ideas and principles there, and I am sure they can be refined. Also good that you relate the ideas to the thinking of Ayn Rand. I suggest that development on those lines would be more useful than commenting from the usual theological standpoints.
Regarding "the four orders of being humane": First order: okay, but to what end? And who is the arbiter of whether or not one is "used by others?" Second order: Again, okay, but what predicates this application of The Golden Rule? (How does one derive this view without calling upon the notion of the mystical?) Third order: what is the context or standard against which one evaluates one's self? Without an objective third-party, this inevitably results in narcissism or misplaced hero-worship... Fourth order: see third order above.
That being said, I completely agree that drama can be used to elicit critical thinking by the introduction of moral dilemmas and their potential outcomes.
Also good that you relate the ideas to the thinking of Ayn Rand.
I suggest that development on those lines would be more useful than commenting from the usual theological standpoints.
Here is the book: https://ethicspress.com/products/mode...
First order: okay, but to what end? And who is the arbiter of whether or not one is "used by others?"
Second order: Again, okay, but what predicates this application of The Golden Rule? (How does one derive this view without calling upon the notion of the mystical?)
Third order: what is the context or standard against which one evaluates one's self? Without an objective third-party, this inevitably results in narcissism or misplaced hero-worship...
Fourth order: see third order above.
That being said, I completely agree that drama can be used to elicit critical thinking by the introduction of moral dilemmas and their potential outcomes.