Ayn Rand Got It Right.

Posted by freedomforall 1 year, 5 months ago to Philosophy
8 comments | Share | Flag

Excerpt:
"here is a tendency in the world of ideas to divide thinkers into saints and witches. Some are singled out for a hagiographic treatment. When others discover issues with their thoughts or lives, the switch is flipped and they become worthy of being burned. They are either valorized or demonized. This has happened to countless intellectuals: Voltaire, Jefferson, Darwin, Marx, Freud, Heidegger, and thousands more.

It’s all quite infantile. The better approach is one born of maturity. Read everything and everyone and learn what you can and toss out what’s wrong. Of course this requires work and thought. In fact, the saint/witch dichotomy is merely a mask for laziness. It’s a way of finding a fast track to truth that dispenses with the arduous task of actual research.

Few have been victimized by this habit as much as the novelist and philosopher Ayn Rand. People might encounter her work in high school and decide to adopt it as a personal credo, only to find out later in life that the world is more complicated than she describes and they turn against her.



This is all unfortunate. She was a singularly insightful intellectual from whom there is a vast amount to learn.

...
there are precise contributions she has made that make her writings an indispensable guide to understanding modern life, both the problems and many of the answers."
SOURCE URL: https://www.zerohedge.com/political/what-ayn-rand-got-right


Add Comment

FORMATTING HELP

All Comments Hide marked as read Mark all as read

  • Comment hidden by post owner or admin, or due to low comment or member score. View Comment
  • Posted by mshupe 1 year, 5 months ago
    Great find! There are a few items in the article that should be corrected, but they are not worth mentioning here. What is worth mentioning is that she invented Galt's Gulch. It's her creation, and it's the home of those who are dedicated to existence and reason as absolutes.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
    • Posted by $ Olduglycarl 1 year, 5 months ago
      The mere idea of Not doing business with a government, a system and/or demented portion of society by taking one's created value elsewhere thereby depriving them of control and the tendency to usurp that value.
      The Problem though, is that even after being deprived of one's created values they Still never learned to play nice . . .

      That's where I noticed the "Perpetually Parasitical Humanoidal behavioral tantrums of the Global Delete and the Great Unwashed.
      Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
      • Posted by 1 year, 5 months ago
        In today's reality, there is no practical way to create a Gulch short of armed revolt to dismantle the Deep State's
        overt act of stealing all privacy and forcing virtually everyone to surrender their production at gunpoint.
        Government access to recording devices should be taboo, but they will never stop unless force of arms is used.
        Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
        • Posted by $ Markus_Katabri 1 year, 5 months ago
          True there is no way to create a force field shrouded valley out of the sight of government stooges. There never has been. We need to think of it metaphorically. THIS website itself is a Gulch of sorts. We are a subset of a subset. Too small to trifle with. But the ideas we exchange have power. Whomever runs this site won’t mess with us because we are an income stream to them. This site doesn’t offer anything of real value except uncensored access to ideas. The instant I detect censorship of ideas (vulgarity aside) I shall take my shekels elsewhere. Perhaps create my own Gulch.
          Galt and the other strikers weren’t trying to actively change “the system” from within. They simply let it fail on its own. When they needed to they’d jack back into the system. It’s more like the Matrix Movie. I currently exist outside the system. I use the system for things I need to obtain that I cannot any other way. However, I am participating in parallel systems. Farmer’s markets (even the leftist ones) like to barter. You’d be surprised how many talented medical professionals are out there practicing free agency now because they refused the jab. It’s almost like a wild frontier inside an established society.
          The government is prepared for and expects a full on frontal assault. I propose a death of a thousand cuts. We simply need to stop propping up this corrupt empire through our efforts.
          When they inevitably send the stooges with guns to coerce through violence. Treat them as you would any home invader. We are endowed by our creator with certain inalienable rights. I don’t need to beg permission of the crown to go about my life peacefully. And I damn sure won’t surrender those rights peacefully either. I count 1-1 a net win in the defense of liberty.
          Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
          • Posted by 1 year, 5 months ago
            👍 Unfortunately it will be a very slow process due to "convenience" that the existing system uses to pay for
            the debt slavery and 'security' slavery of the majority (soon to be adding hunger slavery, access to
            earnings slavery, and access to medical care slavery). If they are finally deprogrammed by tyranny
            it may be too late for the rest of us who want to be able to excel and produce at our best.
            Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
      • Comment hidden by post owner or admin, or due to low comment or member score. View Comment
      • Posted by mshupe 1 year, 5 months ago
        No, they won't, and that's the epiphany that Dagny and Rearden had to experience for themselves. Let them rot and destroy themselves. That's what makes the strike such a marvelous plot device and impossible to understand by most critics of AS.
        Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by LibertyBelle 1 year, 5 months ago
    I think she was wonderful. She may have saved my life. I thought I was incapable of love because I could not imagine loving someone with absolutely no motivation. I thought : even if it were not for his money (and I would never have loved a man for his money), even if it were not for his physical appearance; if it were for admiration for his moral virtues (honesty and integrity), or for a certain joy of life I saw in him, that would still be selfish because it would be for his effect on me; so it was still all self, self, self.(I see now that I had been influenced by some Jim Taggart notion.) But I saw a book "the Virtue of Selfishness" on a trading bookshelf in the Waynesboro public library--put one book in, and you can take one out and keep it. So I did, and read it. I knew I was selfish, but didn't think it could be a virtue. But I read the book, and it straightened me out.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
    • Posted by VetteGuy 1 year, 4 months ago
      I had a similar experience. I remember hearing the phrase: "there's no such thing as an unselfish act" and it resonated with me. I just can't find where it came from.

      "Selfishness" has such a bad reputation in today's society, that it is hard to get past that. AR chose the word to be controversial, and she certainly achieved that. I sometimes wish she had chosen differently - maybe "rational self interest". That's the phrase I tend to use when discussing objectivist topics with the "uninitiated".
      Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  

FORMATTING HELP

  • Comment hidden. Undo