The God of the Machine - Tranche #3
Chapter One, Excerpt 3 of 3
The Energy Circuit of the Classical World
Briefly sketched, the method by which Rome swept the seas verges on the burlesque. Ignorant of naval maneuvers, and with no chance to learn, the Romans simply transformed an encounter at sea into something like a land battle as possible and fought it their own way. Between victories, the Romans generally wrecked their own fleets by inexpert seamanship. The expense bore heavily on Rome.
Nor did Rome resort to state absolutism on the plea of emergency; there was no seizure of private means. It should be noted that though Roman military discipline strict, and esteem appropriate to conduct in the field, a Roman general, or his troops, stood in less fear of penalties from their own government than the Punic commanders. On the other hand, if the secret of the development and longevity of the Roman empire inhered in military aptitude, the conquering regime of Napoleon should have struck root and flourished for an equal duration.
“If Rome in due time forced the locks of the Atlantic, there was a reason. Still, it was a Greek who went through alone. Moreover, the personal character of Pytheas is so relevant that fiction could scarcely invent him. He was a scientist as well as a merchant adventurer. Though admitted to have made valuable contributions to the science of astronomy, he was accused of lying about what he saw with his own eyes, by men who had never been there at all. What should be marked is the form of opposition he was obliged to encounter.”
The Energy Circuit of the Classical World
Briefly sketched, the method by which Rome swept the seas verges on the burlesque. Ignorant of naval maneuvers, and with no chance to learn, the Romans simply transformed an encounter at sea into something like a land battle as possible and fought it their own way. Between victories, the Romans generally wrecked their own fleets by inexpert seamanship. The expense bore heavily on Rome.
Nor did Rome resort to state absolutism on the plea of emergency; there was no seizure of private means. It should be noted that though Roman military discipline strict, and esteem appropriate to conduct in the field, a Roman general, or his troops, stood in less fear of penalties from their own government than the Punic commanders. On the other hand, if the secret of the development and longevity of the Roman empire inhered in military aptitude, the conquering regime of Napoleon should have struck root and flourished for an equal duration.
“If Rome in due time forced the locks of the Atlantic, there was a reason. Still, it was a Greek who went through alone. Moreover, the personal character of Pytheas is so relevant that fiction could scarcely invent him. He was a scientist as well as a merchant adventurer. Though admitted to have made valuable contributions to the science of astronomy, he was accused of lying about what he saw with his own eyes, by men who had never been there at all. What should be marked is the form of opposition he was obliged to encounter.”
“Mankind has vacillated for untold centuries between Objectivity (Aristotle's Logic and Galileo's experimental method, primarily) and Subjectivity (Protagoras' "Man is the measure of all things, of things that are, that they are, of things that are not, that they are not.")”
The last major outbreak of Objectivity called the Age of Enlightenment in the 17th and 18th Centuries which peaked with The Declaration of Independence and the Constitution began to ebb soon after the Constitution was presented to the world. America today (2023) is totally run by Subjectivists. I agree with your assertion that there has never been a government created on the principles of individualism.
The question is why haven’t men been able to take the foundation provided by those two documents and moved closer to a government based on the principles of individualism? Why have we sunk back into the muck of Subjectivism?
Paragraph 2 - Objective rewards and penalties are founded in what can be controlled.
Paragraph 3 - Objective evidence is frequently dismissed or punished but wins in the long-run.