15

The God of the Machine - Tranche #10

Posted by mshupe 1 year, 5 months ago to Economics
16 comments | Share | Best of... | Flag

Chapter IV, Excerpt 1 of 1
Rome as an Exhibit of the Nature of Government

Egypt was fossilized by government ownership of the land; the absolute power of government made the country a helpless prey of invaders. Private property was the norm with the Athenians; but they tried to impose monopolies on commerce with their colonies. Carthage was a corporative state. When the enterprisers of any nation tapped a source of trade, the sought to use political power to impound the flow completely.

The Romans were not primarily traders, having been engaged with their great problem of finding the political principle. Rome was strictly a consumer of material goods. The whole energy which sustained the empire as a going concern came from outside the imperial city. It arose from the private effort and intelligence, from the enterprise and labor of individuals, who asked in return – simply to be let alone. It reveals a peculiar negative; during her regime, Rome contributed nothing to the actual, productive processes.

The extractions of the bureaucracy increased, and the number of officials multiplied. The producers, receiving less and less in exchange for their products, were impoverished and discouraged. Naturally, they tended to produce less. The tax eaters had absorbed the energy. The routes of the barbarian migrations simply followed the main trade routes. There was nothing to stop them.


Add Comment

FORMATTING HELP

All Comments Hide marked as read Mark all as read

  • Posted by freedomforall 1 year, 5 months ago
    So Rome made others an 'offer they couldn't refuse', a protection contract against the army of Rome.
    As does the current fedgov to its "allies."
    It isn't "for their own good", nor "for the greater good", nor to bring them (or to protect) democracy.
    It's just evil "might makes right." Power corrupts all people.
    Therefore, government must only have barely enough power to enforce its very limited purposes,
    and no option to expand power or purposes.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ Markus_Katabri 1 year, 5 months ago
    The author gets it.
    Rome didn’t fall due to lack of military might. Rome fell because the average Roman citizen grew weary of propping up a corrupt imperium through their time and efforts.
    go Galt!
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
    • Comment hidden by post owner or admin, or due to low comment or member score. View Comment
    • Posted by 1 year, 5 months ago
      From what little I know, with price controls, the impounding of grain, and debasing the currency, farmers stopped producing and moved to the city. Little remained of the decentralized power structure to defend property.
      Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by j_IR1776wg 1 year, 5 months ago
    Most telling in this chapter is: “…The mechanism was thus constructed to utilize the pressure of latent revolt in its action, to kick back, recoil. When finally, the provincials regarded themselves as Romans, and could not imagine themselves reverting to a separate nationality, the empire was done for. In effect, it blew the cylinder head…”

    This is, precisely, what happened to America in 1913 with the passage of the 17th Amendment. The Constitution required the State Legislatures to vote on the two Senators to represent the interests of that State in Washington D.C. The States and the Senate represented “…the pressure of latent revolt…” The Federal Government had to pay heed to the possible separatist revolution and act accordingly. The direct election of Senators by the people eliminated the threat of separation and the energy began flowing toward D.C. Today, we think of ourselves, primarily, as Americans and not as Coloradans or New Jerseyites.

    The spirit of revolution has been extinguished. A State(s)-led revolt to curtail the power of the Federal government and its millions of employees and thousands of contractors is impossible.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
    • Comment hidden by post owner or admin, or due to low comment or member score. View Comment
    • Posted by 1 year, 5 months ago
      Excellent point and comparison. "It's continuance called for positive resistance to the agencies of government from the peripheral parts. As a receiver of taxes, the provincial governor was in danger if he took too much."
      Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ blarman 1 year, 5 months ago
    Rome had two distinctly different periods: one where it was still a Republic and one where it descended into a Monarchy. The former was very solid and focused on family values, agricultural production, and trade. The latter became dependent on war and the looting of conquered nations in order to support the excesses of the elites. Which one does our nation more closely resemble?
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
    • Comment hidden by post owner or admin, or due to low comment or member score. View Comment
    • Posted by 1 year, 5 months ago
      I think the transition from republic to executive state power began with government mandated schools, then fiat currency, WWI, etc. Woodrow Wilson's presidency may have been the tipping point.
      Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
      • Posted by $ blarman 1 year, 5 months ago
        Wilson certainly accelerated it, but I'd suggest one other item which neatly corresponded with Wilson's presidency - the adoption of the Federal Reserve. Everything started going downhill from that moment.
        Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
        • Comment hidden by post owner or admin, or due to low comment or member score. View Comment
        • Posted by 1 year, 5 months ago
          And the creation of the IRS and popular election of the US Senate.
          Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
          • Posted by $ blarman 1 year, 5 months ago
            Sixteenth and Seventeenth Amendments, respectively, yes, I agree. I don't think it was any coincidence that the Sixteenth Amendment was passed within years of the authorization of Federal Reserve. Tax monies can't be extorted if they aren't being collected and power can't be exerted over the plebians in the populace any better than by money!
            Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by lkparkerjr 1 year, 5 months ago
    Our forefathers developed a fairly good government system; however, like every leader humankind has had -- they failed to fully understand how more like animals we are than Jesus Christ.
    Our predatory animal instinct is the magnet for wealth and power. It is our nature to consume (food, wealth, power, etc.) until we burst or die of starvation (the tax eaters had absorbed the energy).
    We will stand a better chance at maintaining our freedom and more uniform power when we build more localized institutions.
    On the other hand, the tendency for 90% of population to prefer "sheephood" over personal responsibility -- localization creates Puritanism/Cults where the populace give over their rights to the local wolf.
    We have lost to the barbarians. Rome devolved into many kingdoms/tribes with the investment of death/misery. At this point, no more hand ringing. Prepare. Find your gulch.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  

FORMATTING HELP

  • Comment hidden. Undo