Loose Monetary Policy Has Been Working, So Far

Posted by CircuitGuy 10 years, 3 months ago to Economics
4 comments | Share | Flag

This article is about how so far people in favor of tighter monetary policy (everyone here but me?) appear to have been wrong, so far. Loose monetary policy is working, or at the very least is not causing a problem, so far.

It may be overstating it to say loose monetary policy "saved" the economy. Monetary policy is important, but much less so IMHO than central bankers think. All the value is in serving one another in mutual exchanges. What we use to trade affects short-term ups and down, but the value is in creating things other people like.

I suspect the Fed will gently start letting off the gas pedal, and we won't see a spike in inflation or unused production capacity.

I don't understand why Treasury yields are so low, but Congress could use a reminder that it won't last forever. If the media aren't wigging out about the steep cuts, they're not cutting spending enough.
SOURCE URL: http://finance.yahoo.com/news/tkt-150750657.html


Add Comment

FORMATTING HELP

All Comments Hide marked as read Mark all as read

  • Posted by freedomforall 10 years, 3 months ago
    The only reason that the actions of the fed have not destroyed the dollar is that other central banks have also acted in the same idiotic way. So virtually all currencies have been destroyed in parallel.
    Imo, history shows that empires in decline debase their currencies and other currencies follow their lead (because that is the nature of looters.) The result is that the risk averse flock to the currency of the empire in fear. This temporarily supports the empire's currency. Eventually the profligate ways of the failing empire become to great to ignore and the collapse occurs. It is unavoidable.

    It is not working.

    (The policies of Iceland are the only rational ones thusfar.)
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by khalling 10 years, 3 months ago
    Here is a good response to your article's assertions. It is a year old now, but addresses the key points. fyi: get beyond the beginning hubris of the speaker it is a meaty talk. I completely disagree with him regarding crypto-currency.
    Victor Sperandeo: the coming Hyper inflation
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vZO5kcQV...
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
    • Posted by 10 years, 3 months ago
      Interesting. I didn't find his style grating at all.

      He starts with premise once the gov't starts borrowing it *cannot* stop. If we accept the premise, I agree with his claim that eventually there will be a fiscal crisis which leads to a monetary crisis. My claim is some point along the way, which should have been years ago, people will become aware and make the simple changes to solve the problems. The changes are simple but painful, but not as painful as hyperinflation.

      It was nice that when he is criticizing Keynesian economics, he clearly states that the policies he is criticizing are actually contrary to Keynes. He is upfront that he's condemning a perverted version of Keynesian economics, not Keynesian economics.

      His last point about the three branches is powerful. I notice it more when it's policies I don't like. The branches don't balance each other as they should, and the Executive takes too much power.

      Someone asked him the question of what to do. He said hold 5% of net worth in commodities, preferably ones you can get your hands on. If you're going to hold a significant portion of net worth in cash instruments, he says, don't hold it all in one currency. I strongly agree with both suggestions. I would add that holding gold or cash is not investing. It's insurance. Insurance doesn't create value; it takes a bit of your wealth in exchange for mitigating risk.
      Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  

FORMATTING HELP

  • Comment hidden. Undo