I saw the 11:35 matinee today. The theater could hold about 100 people more or less, but there were only me and one other customer. Now I have seen all 3 parts. I read the book and my opinion was that a great idea for a novel had been ruined by an author who was not up to the task. My opinion of parts 1 and 2 of the movie is that although they were not very good compared to other films I've seen, they were better than the book. However, unfortunately, I found part 3 worse than parts 1 and 2 and worse than the book. Rand's dialog is wooden and her characterizations one dimensional. It seems like part 3 was an attempt to capture those shortcomings on film. If you think the book was great literature, you need to ask yourself whether it is humanly possible to make a bad film from a great book. If you can imagine such a thing, then see if I'm not wrong about this one.