Galt's Gulch
10

It is hard to hold my breath at Sphincter Factor Nine

Posted by $ Commander 1 year, 11 months ago to Government
21 comments | Share | Flag

This is an interview from the Raland Brunson case going through the US Supreme Court (22-380 Docket). The interview is with Loy Brunson, brother of Raland and two others. At least get the first 10 minutes. https://caravantomidnight.com/1923-hi...
Adding link from Dobrien (Thanks D): https://rumble.com/v1wc74o-historic-s...


This is a link to the PDF. https://www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPD...

Should this fail, remember, each of us, shall have to institute such assertions, at local and county level, to overtake these breaches of Covenant and Contract.
SOURCE URL: https://caravantomidnight.com/1923-historic-scotus-case-could-drain-the-swamp/

Add Comment

FORMATTING HELP

All Comments Hide marked as read Mark all as read

    -
  • Posted by Aeronca 1 year, 11 months ago
    I couldn't get the video but I skimmed the court document PDF. So I get this. Brunson is suing all the 300+ scum who ignored the rigged election from the House to the Senate to Joe and QueMala. There is a contention between two principles. The Doctrine of Equitable Maxim and The Doctrine of the Object Principle of Justice. Trying to read farther I can't see the essence of the argument, but it Sounds Like Equity vs. Logic. I'm probably wrong. I'm confusing the use of the word Equity with the social justice bullshit equity.

    It sounds like a long shot. But clearly it's made it's way to the Supreme Court and it was carefully written and considered.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
      -
    • Posted by $ Commander 1 year, 11 months ago
      Did you go down the left side of the page for the vid?
      Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
        -
      • Posted by Aeronca 1 year, 11 months ago
        Found it. And the Rumble. So the short summary is reinstatement of Trump since the election was stolen. I predict the Supreme Courtporation will side with the USA, INC. They won't risk their asses. Funny if they would, what a riot. Literally. The streets would be filled with people and police and national guard.
        Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
        • Posted by $ Commander 1 year, 11 months ago
          SCOTUS is in a bad position if they refute. Aiding and abetting would be the result, if I'm not mistaken. The judges can exonerate themselves by upholding law. If nothing else, the decency of the suit should be spread amongst the peoples of this nation, that a candid review be available. If this is in mind it can be in action.
          Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
          -
        • Posted by Dobrien 1 year, 11 months ago
          That might happen if they don’t.
          It is very strange that they were able to make it to SCOTUS.
          Devine intervention? Or Devolution?
          Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
          • Posted by $ Commander 1 year, 11 months ago
            The Brunsons have been dealing in this arena for over a decade. I began my foray into Federal law and Regulation just over 10 years ago. There are enough individuals who (WHO) have been "pushed" by this 50-year encroaching system of "takeover". Those born mid 20th C., who were not bombarded with inane "messaging", or had lifestyle or outside interests that precluded the bombardment exposure, have better buffers of "reasonableness".

            Devine intervention? Devolution? Or reasonable Evolution?
            As far as concerns the Justices, will they prove to worship Life or Death?
            Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
            -
          • Posted by Aeronca 1 year, 11 months ago
            Perhaps Devolution...?
            Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
              -
            • Posted by Dobrien 1 year, 11 months ago
              I have no high expectations on any specific event or occurrence. It may very well be something like this, or From past Q posts , statements like “the first arrests will shock the world” and exposure of the widespread very high up pee doh / trafficking will unite the public, Dems and Republicans.
              Example
              Sometimes you can't TELL the public the truth.
              YOU MUST SHOW THEM.
              ONLY THEN WILL PEOPLE FIND THE WILL TO CHANGE.
              Crimes against CHILDREN UNITE all humanity [cross party lines]?
              Difficult truths.
              Q

              And about arrests many posts ,here are some digested

              How can you make ARRESTS [non military] prior to first fully cleaning out corrupt elements [at the top] of those departments [FBI][DOJ] that oversee ‘investigation & prosecution’ in the United States [they [themselves] are the very ones engaged in the illegal treasonous acts]?

              It must happen.
              Conspiracy no more.
              Think of every post made.
              It would force us to prove everything stated to avoid looking crazy, correct?
              What do they fear the most?
              Public awakening.
              If they ask.
              They self destruct.
              They know this is real.
              See attacks.
              The build is near complete.
              Growing exponentially.
              You are the frame.
              You are the support.
              People will be lost.
              People will be terrified.
              People will reject.
              People will need to be guided.
              Do not be afraid.
              We will succeed.
              Timing is everything.
              Think Huber.
              Think DOJ/FBI reorg.
              Think sex/child ARRESTS / news.
              Think resignations (loss of control).
              How do you remove evil in power unless you reveal the ultimate truth?
              It must be compelling to avoid a divide (political attack/optics).
              We are the majority (growing).
              WW.
              Sheep no more.
              TOGETHER.
              Q


              Are you ready to see ARRESTS?
              Are you ready to see PAIN?
              Are you ready to be part of history?
              Q

              Look for ‘Placeholder’ updates @ /PatriotsFight
              Indictments, ARRESTS, and DECLAS will force WW coverage.
              Leaks, bribery, collusion re: media will force resignations w/ follow up criminal prosecution.
              Q

              "I will gladly take all those slings and arrows for you." - POTUS
              But, even that, can be undone.
              The enormity of what is coming will SHOCK THE WORLD.
              Pray.
              Q

              I also think arrest won’t happen with BuyDem as an occupying Pres because of Pardons he could give.
              Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
    -
  • Posted by $ blarman 1 year, 11 months ago
    I'll get out my popcorn. While I sincerely hope Brunson prevails, I fear our nation has gone too far astray...
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
    • Posted by $ Commander 1 year, 11 months ago
      I look at this as I would a sailing yacht race. Never give up until crossing a finish. I've seen races won and lost by seconds because of attentiveness or relaxation.
      And while this suit demonstrates good tactic and strategy I can't see which way the wind shifts. Should it be upheld in the manner of Representative Republic Law, I wonder at the complexity and time to dispel 50 years of concentrated propaganda.
      Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
    -
  • Posted by $ jdg 1 year, 11 months ago
    Any lawyer will tell you this is sovereign-citizen level nonsense. Sorry to burst your bubble.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
    • Posted by $ Commander 1 year, 11 months ago
      This case has nothing to do with such.
      This case is about 100 Representatives bringing "issue" forward and the rest ignored a rule of law concerning. You need to read the Case and procedure.
      Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  

FORMATTING HELP

  • Comment hidden. Undo