Seattle: Misstep in gun bill could defeat the effort
“In order to continue to possess an assault weapon that was legally possessed on the effective date of this section, the person possessing shall ... safely and securely store the assault weapon. The sheriff of the county may, no more than once per year, conduct an inspection to ensure compliance with this subsection.”
A person steals guns, (WHICH IS AGAINST THE LAW), shoots and kills his own mother (WHICH IS AGAINST THE LAW), transports these guns loaded (WHICH IS AGAINST THE LAW), brings guns onto school property (WHICH IS AGAINST THE LAW), breaks into the school (WHICH IS AGAINST THE LAW), discharges the weapons within city limits (WHICH IS AGAINST THE LAW), murders 26 people (WHICH IS AGAINST THE LAW), and commits suicide (WHICH IS AGAINST THE LAW).
And there are people in this country that somehow think passing ANOTHER LAW banning guns would protect us from someone like this. If you haven't noticed, people like this are not concerned about breaking laws - they only care about fulfilling their own twisted agenda.
The only people that a gun ban law would impact are the LAW ABIDING CITIZENS, which will only serve to cripple the ability to protect ourselves.
Eudaimonia, the videos you posted over the weekend of public officials in your state are truly frightening. They are not rationally driven people. Let us hope cooler heads will prevail.
Regards,
O.A.
“I made a mistake,” Kline said. “I frankly should have vetted this more closely.” ' This guy is an attorney? Wow. If this idiot was in the private sector he'd be fired. Of course then the attorney's union (know there isn't one..) would sue, a good judge would throw it out. The appeals court would overturn it. Then maybe the good judge will shrug.
http://www.leg.wa.gov/pages/home.aspx